Destruction in whose name and of whose?

Submitted by Abuhajira (South Africa), Sep 21, 2007 at 23:54

Donovan said,

"If Islam cannot or will not be reformed, then its destruction is the only alternative."

Listen to yourself. Are you preaching peace? First you say that "Islam" which you by yourself do not have any right upon, needs to be reformed. Then you say that it needs to be "reformed" (i.e the muslims will not reform themselves, rather the reformation will be done by someone else). And finally you say, the only alternative is destruction.

So listen to yourself again, are you preaching peace or that which you are condemning yourself!?!

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".