Our dear Amin and his bogus Arabic

Submitted by dhimmi no more (United States), Oct 30, 2011 at 07:44

Our dear Amin wrote this bogus and atrocious Arabic sentence wa mutakallim haqiqa aw la and then he told us that the word haqiqa is really a maf3ool mutlaq which it is not or may be a zarf or ism mansoob and only allahu a3lam so here is what is really al-mafool al-mutlaq again from the "children's" book of grammar that he is now quoting

المفعول المطلق(1)

المفعول المطلق: مصدر منصوب، يُذكَر بعد فعلٍ - أو شبهه(2) - من لفظه فيؤكّده، نحو: [زحف الجيش زحفاً، فوثقت أنه منتصرٌ انتصاراً...].

ويشتمل البحث في المفعول المطلق على مسألتين هما: أن يُحذَف، أو يُحذَف فعلُه (عامله).

أوّلاً - أنْ يُحذَف:

يُحذَف المصدر (المفعول المطلق) في حالات شتّى. لكنها على اختلافها وتنوعها، يحكمها ضابط واحد. هو أنّ المصدر - وإن حُذِف - يظلّ في الكلام ملحوظاً مُلتَمَحاً، ودونك البيان:

رجع القهقرى = رجع رجوعَ القهقرى

أكل كثيراً = أكل أكلاً كثيراً

ضربه سوطاً = ضربه ضربَ السوطِ

ضربه ذاك الضربَ = ضربه الضربَ ذاك

So let us see akala kathir can also be akala akla (the verbal noun that has a kasra or al-maf3ool al-mutlaq) kathir

Hint so what is al-maf3ool al-mutlaq in such sentence that was deleted in the first version of the sentence?let me help you it is not kathir as you just claimed

You cannot even read a book of grammar right?

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".