1 readers online now  |  69 million page views

The corrupted Qur'an and more evidence

Reader comment on item: Obama, the Middle East and Islam - An Initial Assessment
in response to reader comment: Elohiym - Allah - same meaning

Submitted by dhimmi no more (United States), Feb 15, 2009 at 17:02

Our dear samer is desperate to prove that Allah is really the real enchilada wrote

>Elohiym - Allah - Elli - Eloi (they are the same)

really? then congratulations our dear samer the wannabe arab as your Allah is the ethnic God of the jews and he is Jesus too. You think that i should tell the folks in the UAE that a maskeen min el-bakistan is saying that Allah is really Jesus and the ethnic God of the Jews?

But wait: I just watched one of Father Zakaria Botros's episodes of hiwar al-haq and he was talking about the corrupted Qur'an and I have a few questions for you:

1. The tradition tells us that the Qur'an was revealed as al-ahruf al-saba3a right?

2. Then we are told that it is revealed in lughat qurish right?then what are these al-ahruf al-sab3a and why does it say in the Cairo Qur'an in surat al-fatiha maalki (the onwer of) and in the Tunisian Qur'an mailki (or the king of) and do you think that this very example prove that the whole thing about the Uthman codex is no more than another bogus qissa by the ulama? after all we either have one reading or not and by the way did Abul Qasim hear it as maliki or maaliki mr ignorant? It cannot be both and in Allah's lawh mahfooz is it maliki or maaliki or does Allah has seven readings of the Qur'an but if so then we only have one reading which means that the Qur'an has been corrupted

3. Then we are told that al-mushaf al-3uthmani is the one we have today and that he burned the other huruf right? more evidence here is that no other than the little fascist Ibn Taymiyya said that: mushaf 3uthman ahad al-huruf al-sab3a. Oh the Arabic? I think you know by now that i do not translate arabic for Pakistanis like you. He also said that al-huruf al-sab3a inahum lughat wa lahjat and let me guess one of them must have been Syriac

What a fadiha (or scandal) and do you know what this means? It means that the Qur'an has been really corrupted because we are left with one reading and the others were burnt or eaten by a hungry goat

4. And here is your bonus for today: Then which mushaf is really the one allah has in his little library or al-lawh al-mahfooz? and how do you know that it was not one the al-ahruf that were burnt or eaten by a hungry goat?

The collection of the Qur'an a no more than a joke

Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Comment on this item

Mark my comment as a response to The corrupted Qur'an and more evidence by dhimmi no more

Email me if someone replies to my comment

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

See recent outstanding comments.

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List
eXTReMe Tracker

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2020 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)