69 million page views

Revisiting this Quranic disaster

Reader comment on item: Q&A: Remaking a Religion
in response to reader comment: Paul Not Chosen

Submitted by dhimmi no more (United States), Aug 17, 2013 at 12:40

I think it is sad and a reflection about how Muslims think so our dear Submitter who lives in Malaysia which without the Chinese citizens will be a basket case like Bangladesh and what does he do in his country while the Chinese citizens of Malaysia work hard? he makes a fool of himself

? the proclamation God is 'One Of' (People would be laughing at how you interpret it :) )

Mr demagogue I'm not the one who is interpreting this poor Arabic it is your islamic sources that had to deal with this disaster so if you do not like what I'm saying then destroy your islamic sources and good riddance

But you tell me how come your so called Allah did not "reveal" his book in Urdu the language of your people is there something wrong with Urdu our dear Submitter the lost tablighee? and submitter to what? to an Arabian deity that cannot understand Urdu? and does he understand you when you pray to him? He is an Arab and you ain't right?

יהוה אחד (Deuteronomy 6:4) God is One

No this is an incomplete She'ma your so called prophet plagiarized it from the Syrians via the Jews as you shall see and he did not even get it

For the readers as you shall see in a more expanded post I will tell you about how this Quranic disaster came about but in short it must be from the Syriac form of the She'ma and the so called author of the Qur'an must have the text in Garshouni (Arabic or Syro-Arabic written using Syriac alphabet) and this very well explain the word HU in the Syriac She'ma and becoming Arabic HU edited as Huwa and also the word Ahad is from the Syriac root Had and in this case Ahada

What a disaster

الله احد (Quran 112:1) God is One (and Only)

And where would we kuffar find your bogus (and only) in Q112:1 you will not find it which makes you either a liar or ignorant so which one is it?

Let me help you your sources tell us that Allahu Ahad must mean Allah is ONE OF you do not believe me then read al-Tabari or Ibn kathir or the disaster in al-Qurtubi of WAHADA! So is it wahada O glorious madrassa graduate?

In the past God did not say He is One Of. Why would He say He is One Of in his final testament?

Your logic is not just flawed it is stupid you are saying that if Allah, assuming that he is the ethnic God of the Jews, says in the Hebrew She'ma that Adonai Echad then he must say in its Arabic form Allahu Ahad after all the word Echad becomes Ahad! Do you see why your argument is stupid

Let me help you it is a disaster because the author of the Qur'an's Arabic is this case was poor and he selected a word which means one but not in Arabic but in Syriac and Hebrew which means that the Qur'an indeed has its share of non Arabic words which makes the Q12;2 Qur'an Arabi to be no more than a lie or even worse that the author of the Qur'an did not know proper Arabic so which one is it you tell me?

Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Comment on this item

Mark my comment as a response to Revisiting this Quranic disaster by dhimmi no more

Email me if someone replies to my comment

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

See recent outstanding comments.

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2023 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)