The refutation that didn't refute

Submitted by James K. Condon, MD (United States), Jan 3, 2003 at 06:39

I don't think they answered your questions. On the contrary, they fell into the "argumentum ad hominum" logical flaw. Thanks to the LA Times for exposing these types to be exactly who you said they are.

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".