In Hoc Signo Vinces
Reader comment on item: From the Halls of Academia

Submitted by CyberData (Saudi Arabia), Dec 28, 2002 at 16:49

Professors Foner & Gibson feign surprise, even hurt, that they were verbally "assaulted" for their remarks vis a vis the Iraqi situation. I find it hard to believe that they and I inhabit the same planet.

It's interesting to note that many, probably most, possibly all academics who espouse the same sort of leftist viewpoints that they do have had other than what might be called a "normal" background.

Foner, for example, was a "red-diaper baby" of sorts and Gibson was probably one of the nation's first "affirmative action" officers in the private sector years ago. Each of these odd situations either nurtured or reflected a revulsion at the America they grew up in.

My point is that there are manifest reasons why academics display anti-american sentiments so readily. After all, both Foner and Gibson are specialists in American history......Foner of "reconstruction", Gibson of "the South" (interspersed with "gender" and all that).

Now why specialists in such arcane subjects feel qualified to publically declare their viewpoints on subjects they are abysmally ignorant of, I don't know. But they do.

And when they do, sometimes sparks will fly. After all, the backlash has been ferocious for these two. Like so many of their ilk, they've completely misread their public and their students.....and, I might add, their country. That's because, in my opinion, they've ceased being part of it, if not legally, then certainly in spirit, long ago.

"What was our sin?", they ask. Actually, that question has a sort of Koranic ring to it.
One of the Koran's Sura's reads: ".....when the baby-girl asks: what is my sin that I should be buried alive...?" (paraphrased), the line that prohibits infanticide of females in Islam.

The sin in this case, of course, is that intentionally or not, you are giving aid and comfort to the enemy and you are influencing young minds with a superficial, naive and ultimately suicidal viewpoint and way of thinking that is disgraceful and embarrassing. No more...and no less.

©yb3rdat4

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.