2 readers online now  |  69 million page views

Chris and his bogus history

Reader comment on item: Shoeless George Bush
in response to reader comment: Dhimmi and tablighees-

Submitted by dhimmi no more (United States), Jul 27, 2007 at 07:27

So Sura 9 was revleaded during the Arab attack on Tabuk! Really?

so ya ayuha al-faylasoof al-kabeer where does it say in Sura 9 anything about:

1. An attack on a city by the name of Tabuk

2. This attack was on the Romans (sic) in the city of Tabuk

(notice that Muhammad used a perfect Syriac word to describe the Greeks and he called them al-Ruum which is a Syriac word when there are perfect Arabic words for "the Greeks" and they are al-ighreeq and al-yunaniyoon and why is that our dear Chris who knows no Arabic or Syriac? Urdu? It does not count here)

3. That the Romans (sic) were _mostly_ Christians

4. And what indeed Allah spoke to Muahmmad via an angel called gabriel!

5. And here is your bonus questions: why did the barbarian Arabs invade the city of Tabuk, and who says that islam was not spread by the sword, and what is the difference between such attack and the crusades?

Where is your bogus evidence?Let me help: the Qur'an does not say so

And is the word Iqtoloo in the infamous ayat al-sayf can also be read as qatiloo? stay tuned for this one

The truth is the Qur'an is an opaque revelation and if the 3Ulama in the 3rd Islam had no clue for example if Allah says Maaliki or Maliki is Surat al-Fatiha or what the word Ilaf in Surat Quraish really means then any tafseer or exegesis for sura 9 is more bogus nonsense by the clueless Muslim 3Ulama who had no clue what the Qur'an really says and shame on you for accepting such nonsense without critical examination

So much for the Qur'an the so called Kitab Mubeen maktub bi 3Arabi faseeh

Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Comment on this item

Mark my comment as a response to Chris and his bogus history by dhimmi no more

Email me if someone replies to my comment

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

See recent outstanding comments.

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List
eXTReMe Tracker

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2021 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)