|
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
Abul Qasim aka Muhammad sent emissaries to the Romans (sic) in Tabuk? Really?Reader comment on item: Shoeless George Bush[ Discusses Islam] Submitted by dhimmi no more (United States), Jul 27, 2007 at 07:46 Where is your extant evidence that Abul Qasim indeed sent "emissaries" to the city of Tabuk? And yes we have all the extant evidence of the period collected by Hoyland in his "Survey" Your claim here is bogus And why did the Arabs invade the Middle East that was neither Arab nor Muslim? Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments". Comment on this item
|
Latest Articles Join Daniel Pipes on a Fact Finding Expedition to Israel, March 2012
For full details click here ADVERTISEMENTS
Most Mailed |
|||||||||||
|
All materials written by Daniel Pipes on this site © 1968-2012 Daniel Pipes. Email: daniel.pipes@gmail.com You can help support Daniel Pipes' work by making a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum. Daniel J. Pipes |
||||||||||||