69 million page views


Reader comment on item: Trump: You Should Ban Islamists, Not Muslims
in response to reader comment: Islam is a monopolist ideology, for sheep, isn't it?

Submitted by UNCLE VLADDI (Canada), Dec 31, 2015 at 17:35

Hi Demsci,

This is getting interesting, isn't it? Here goes:

The only muslims who are "neutral" during islamic conquest are those who are not on the front lines of their mandatory jihad, (i.e: still live well within the existing Ummah) and those who are commanded by the Qur'an itself to lie to the infidels to advance islam, especially when they don't have the numbers to succeed - yet.

Dhimmis are, as you say, "almost are suicidal with their freedoms + seemingly not afraid of anarchy or dictatorship (from Muslims or other monopolists)."

But what they are is in denial - because they are psychologically predisposed to masochism. See, monopolists (aka totalitarians - who want "total" control over everyone else) advertise that, for all others at least, the highest moral virtue is suicidal masochism, and the ultimate crime is hurting a criminal's feelings and thereby offending them, which will "inevitbaly force" them into committing even more crimes!

Criminals ("liberals"; "muslims") are all about the excuses - and those always involve positing them selves as victims, too! Victims of inevitability, or predetermined, predestined force, whether it be as "victims of society/ products of their environments, or of course slaves of allah."

They insist that there are no real crimes nor criminals, because life is too complex for any of us to ever understand cause and effect. So, "since" all so-called "facts" are really only opinions anyway, their entirely fact-free, subjective opinions are somehow the "diversely-opposite equals" to everyone else's silly objective facts!

Believing this nonsense, they have no hope for the future, and as masochists must then only always pretend to have "control" over their own fears, BY causing those very same, worst-case scenario problems (like, by slandering innocent others while importing hordes of barbarians whom they know want to murder us all) which cause the pains they fear the most.

They also adopt a false, "moral high ground" narrative, protocol and etiquette, where they assert - at least to them selves - "If I (DECIDE TO PRE-EMPTIVELY SUBMIT to) agree with your assertion that you're better than me, then whatever happens is all your fault - and, since it's all your fault, then none of it's my fault, so in the end I'm really still bettter than you! Whee!"

So, these criminal negligence also instantly and automatically "defensively, pre-emptively" Submit to and compromise with any given crime perversion or threat... which cowardly Submission the muslims pretend is the highest "holy virtue" and liberals falsely assert is being shrewd, decisive, practical, pragmatic and an example of "realpolitik."

They also call this short-circuiting fear of thinking process "TO GO ALONG" (with criminal lies) "TO GET ALONG" (with lying criminals)! And their all-time favorite alibi to excuse their own criminal desires and actions is the critical thinking logical fallacy known as the Argumentum Tu Quoque:

"Islam isn't an evil crime because we (i.e: you) all do - or at least, did - it, too! Whee!'

As if by merely comparing two unrelated wrongs, one could somehow magically turn one of them into a right.

So what it really amounts to is: "If we don't rush in first, then some other fool will surely beat us to it!"

The liberal "sin" is not only making mistakes, but also then refusing to admit to them or correct them, in stead pretending to affirm them by saying "Screw you! I meant to do that! Nyah!" It's turning basic negligence into criminal negligence. Liberals automatically Submit to their fears of pain by pretending those fears ARE pain. It's simple, cowardly, treasonous masochism: (which all liberals are afflicted by) - when they see something they fear, their immediate response is to Submit to it:

"We have to let the violent criminals do what they want to us, or else they'll do what they want to us anyway!"

In this way, they hope to avoid the fear of pain, by pre-emptively inflicting that pain on themselves (thus cancelling the auxiliary pain caused by the fear)! See?



Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)