69 million page views

I know you are, but what am ?

Reader comment on item: Trump: You Should Ban Islamists, Not Muslims
in response to reader comment: Unconstitutional or Too Constitutional to Question?

Submitted by T.L. winslow (United States), Dec 12, 2015 at 12:25

[[I based my assertion about Trump's idea being unconstitutional not on my own views of the constitution but on an Associated Press report, "Legal Experts Agree: Trump's Proposal I linked to this article in the text, so you should have seen it for yourself.]]

Hehe. Yes, yes, but you quoted some opinions of others on the Constitution without questioning their motives or bringing up the decisions that show them up, which they know about but don't want you to since they have a subversive agenda. I'm not accusing you of being like them, only of being one of their victims, else I believe you would have brought up Harisiades v. Shaughnessy and the 1952 IN Act to keep them from misleading your readers. Now you can. I acknowledge that your credentials on Islam are impeccable. Your pants are firmly in place again :)

I still wonder if you 'get' that banning only Islamists (ISIS soldiers waving black flags etc.) is a recipe for national suicide, because even if they're widows and orphans, all they have to do to weaken the U.S. is bring the Quran with them and hand it to their children, and Allah will do the rest. (Haha, Obama won't allow a Muslim orphan to be adopted by a Christian or Jew, will he?) Muslims have a different mental DNA than Westerners, especially Americans, and a nation divided against itself can't stand. The U.S. has to draw a line in the sand if it doesn't want to go the way of all the other countries in the current Muslim World over the last 1400 years, and for years I've been doing all I can despite swimming against the stream.

Meanwhile poor outnumbered surrounded Israel is our canary in the coal mine and our only real friend in the Muslim World, as well as our super aircraft carrier and forward base, and its continued vitality is necessary to our national security, another reason to ban you know whats from citizenship, or even entry, never mind the weak anti-Trump comments by Israelis who already effectively ban Muslims from entry every day.Who cares if what we do offends Muslims and makes them go Islamist? That's just the reason to ban them all. Even with Muslim nation leaders we can limit their visits to the U.N. HQ if not the White House..Do we want to be weak or strong? Screw the Islamophobia thang, we must get strong and progress past that con game to Islam Awareness and Islam Resistance. GO TRUMP.






Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2023 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)