For Roger so what did we learn from your book reveiw?

Submitted by dhimmi no more (United States), Jan 7, 2007 at 17:37

Let me help you: Nothing. Not a thing

Let me give you a primer here: If you are to reveiew a book you must give us some information about the author or what we call the source behind the source as in who is he/she? His/her education. And what is he/she really saying? His/her thesis that is. And how does he/she support his/her thesis?. And what kind of genre is this book? History? political science? etc....

And then you can pontificate any way you wish but you must be able to support what you are saying by applying textual critisicm to the book and look for internal as well as external consistency in what the author is really saying

Wanna try again?

And remember: your credibility is on the line.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".