69 million page views

Then I take what sounds real

Reader comment on item: Arguing over "Can Islam Be Reformed?"
in response to reader comment: you can take what ever suits you

Submitted by Alain Jean-Mairet (Switzerland), Oct 17, 2013 at 00:08

The isnad itself is not confirmed by any contemporary source. As I said, even the very notions of "Islam", "Muslim", "Muhammad" or "Mecca" are absent of the contemporary record, until the end of the 7th century. And to find 7000 "trustworthy" oral accounts among 600.000 indicates a level of fraud or sloppiness that only some hard facts might allow to master. Islam is built on sand, and is consolidated mostly with blood. Not a trustworthy foundation any way you look at it. Objectively.


Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)