Daniel Pipes
Mobile Edition
Regular Site

Is It Possible To Challenge The Hold Of The Religious Clergy On The Muslim Mind?
Reader comment on item: Winning the Propaganda War [versus Radical Islam]

Submitted by Rakshas 10 Anan (India), Dec 29, 2005 at 11:54

They aspire for Western values, ideas, living standards, goods and services if it serves their interests to subjugate the lower classes and keep themselves atop the power pyramid. A single coup can change the equation radically, and there is no end to coups in the Muslim world.

The Muslim followers of the votaries of modernisation -- seen to be synonymous with westernisation -- are always in the minority. If there is a growing middle class among them, open to the forces of globalisation, then the possibility of winning them over through changing lifestyles, values and beliefs does exist. Without the backing of the ruling class or the state machinery, this middle ground can be lost in an instant when faced with the brainwashed, illiterate and fanatic mobs led by the bearded mullahs, who have considerable vested interest in keeping the Ummah backward.

More often than not, the indoctrinating force of Saudi Wahhabism holds sway over these obscurantists. And now, Al Qaeda or the mutating terrorist outfits in their midst. Nothing in those realms can penetrate the machinery of Koranic propaganda and the Hajj. How to cut into or diminish this hold is the critical issue.

Like the earthquake in Pakistan, a single event can bring to nought the previous gains made in cutting off the resource line of the fundamentalists and the terrorists. This serves to undermine and isolate the moderates, multiplying the risks taken by them to propagate the voice of sanity in a sea of unreasoning extremism.

First the minorities are put at severe risk, as repeatedly highlighted by Dr. Pipes; next come the moderates; and the pro-western ruling class itself can be purged in a groundswell of violent rioting or revolution.

In most Muslim countries, like in Pakistan and Bangladesh, the modernism of the current ruling elite is entirely self-serving and superficial in any case. They are permitted to rule only in alliance with the forces of obscurantism represented by the mullahs and the parties backed by them.

It is like the military leader in civvies, professing love for his dogs in interviews for foreign consumption (in defiance of Islamic proscription, but also out of view of the home audiences), who can at the same time assert that women get raped so they can make millions! Or like the seemingly modern suicide bombers going on a casino and nightclub binge in decadent Western style, before carrying out a deadly Islamist misson motivated with pure hatred.

In the case of Musharraf, we often see a media savvy personality scoring propaganda points to turn the tables on gullible foreign media operatives who have put their faith in the image-building without understanding the extreme restrictions upon the President's accomodative behaviour.

Dr. Pipes is right in that sophisticated efforts to appeal to good sense and sanity must continue, but this should not lead to fool ourselves about the ground realities of Islamofascism. The bottom line is that individual choice is seriously restricted under Islam, and those who would buck the religious line as defined by the mullah would certainly be put to death. This restricts options all around!

The major issue is not propaganda alone, but rather, a dual strategy that also involves decimating the influence of the rigid, obscurantist clergy that is thirsty for the blood of the infidels.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

Submit a comment on this item

Search by Enter name or date
Search Forum Comments:

Reader comments (77) on this item

Title By Date
Media propaganda [195 words]Nenette GrunbergAug 16, 2006 09:52
re:spreading democracy [38 words]Robert mooneyJan 13, 2006 15:42
An Outsider Looking In [3488 words]John RamptonJan 8, 2006 19:55
not the same [84 words]joe roseJan 8, 2006 12:50
More reflection is needed [710 words]John RamptonJan 6, 2006 18:27
Propaganda in the Indian 'Midday.com' [398 words]SonaliJan 3, 2006 00:42
Reply to Sonali [91 words]KhalidJan 3, 2006 01:05
Reply to Khalid [270 words]SonaliJan 3, 2006 10:50
Reply to Sonali, Media [141 words]KhalidJan 8, 2006 02:01
Reply to Khalid [15 words]SonaliJan 9, 2006 12:50
Winning the Propaganda War [versus Radical Islam] [473 words]NonBelieverMay 4, 2006 10:08
Malaysia's Family Law Bill that grossly violates [254 words]SumitraDec 30, 2005 11:53
Cultural influence modifying harsh women oppressive laws [888 words]FauziJamalMar 12, 2006 14:53
winning war [67 words]brooklynbobDec 30, 2005 11:00
Let us be optimistic about propaganda [443 words]N. BhatnagarDec 30, 2005 03:03
To Mr. Bhatnagar [138 words]M. Saleem AkhtarDec 30, 2005 14:43
Let Us Be Optimistic About Propaganda: A comment [213 words]Seamus MacNemiDec 31, 2005 00:41
The quickest way to lose a war. [81 words]Seamus MacNemiJan 1, 2006 23:57
Values plus understanding will win [96 words]Geoff Brown, Deephaven MSApr 6, 2006 10:42
A dire situation in the making [449 words]Seamus MacNemiDec 30, 2005 02:41
Reply to MacNeni [201 words]sullyDec 30, 2005 18:09
Reply to Sully [98 words]Seamus MacNemiDec 31, 2005 18:12
reply - trying to please the co-conspirators at the UN is futile [257 words]sullyJan 1, 2006 17:04
Reply to Mr. Sully [282 words]Seamus MacNemiJan 1, 2006 23:45
Failure to Thrive
[w/response] [185 words]
DaisyDec 29, 2005 17:56
three equally bad choices [117 words]yuval brandstetterDec 29, 2005 16:18
Mullahs control the press in muslim countries [190 words]NaziaDec 29, 2005 15:23
The strengths of Islamic "education" [92 words]Ed BrophyDec 29, 2005 13:25
Der Fuerher's Face [247 words]Yehoshua ZellerDec 29, 2005 13:24
The Strategic Uses Of Satire [135 words]Seamus MacNemiDec 30, 2005 18:33
⇒ Is It Possible To Challenge The Hold Of The Religious Clergy On The Muslim Mind? [544 words]Rakshas 10 AnanDec 29, 2005 11:54
To Rakshas 10 Anan [273 words]M. Saleem AkhtarDec 29, 2005 15:44
To M S Akhtar: Madrassas are a law unto themselves [17 words]Rakshas 10 AnanDec 30, 2005 09:45
Reply to Saleem Akhtar [83 words]Ram KrishnaDec 30, 2005 23:46
the toungue has no bone [931 words]abdelFeb 26, 2006 15:26
Hindus in Sindh [59 words]SindhiFeb 13, 2008 02:02
Winning the war [162 words]SHmuel HaLeviDec 29, 2005 05:28
Reply to My. HaLevi [157 words]Seamus MacNemiJan 2, 2006 00:23
No way you can beat faith with propaganda [235 words]BorisDec 28, 2005 21:59
reply: Boris [224 words]Donald ODec 30, 2005 15:35
MUNICH
[w/response] [37 words]
Robert ArbetmanDec 28, 2005 18:09
The Education of Karen Hughes [221 words]Peter JonesDec 28, 2005 13:14
What will be won with our "message"? [123 words]Ed BrophyDec 28, 2005 13:12
Winning and envy
[w/response] [318 words]
JamesDec 28, 2005 10:27
response to Dr. Pipes response to my letter, 'winning'. [411 words]JamesDec 28, 2005 17:54
"Propaganda" still needed [138 words]Dennis MurphyDec 28, 2005 10:03
Completely agree with Dr. Pipes.. [116 words]M Saleem AkhtarDec 28, 2005 09:53
Walk Softly But Carry A Big Stick!!! [136 words]RPaineDec 28, 2005 08:46
Further Research
[w/response] [82 words]
Samuel SchwartzDec 28, 2005 07:59
What is the practical implication of your solution?
[w/response] [156 words]
N HordesDec 28, 2005 07:41
Good ONLY to the last drop/line
[w/response] [326 words]
Donald YoungDec 27, 2005 20:31
Losing the Propaganda War
[w/response] [362 words]
Reuben HorneDec 27, 2005 20:21
Winning the propaganda war [181 words]steven lDec 27, 2005 20:15
Is The Status Quo In The West's Best Interests? [484 words]Bill NarveyDec 27, 2005 20:02
We just don't understand them! [124 words]Nathan RosenblattDec 27, 2005 19:46
Hear Hear [65 words]Richard D. CritesDec 28, 2005 15:36
Reply to Mr. Rosenblatt [250 words]Seamus MacNemiJan 1, 2006 19:04
Influencing Muslim opinion [218 words]Donald W. BalesDec 27, 2005 19:32
Re: Propaganda war [92 words]Nena SariDec 27, 2005 19:16
Ayesha and Jaladhi are right [301 words]JaneDec 27, 2005 18:42
Broadcasting to the Muslim World [169 words]Leonard MarkowitzDec 27, 2005 18:07
How to win a war? [114 words]Behrouz AzarniaDec 27, 2005 17:01
What Values? [591 words]ddsDec 27, 2005 16:51
Islam will go down in ashes, literally [188 words]George SiterDec 27, 2005 15:29
Propaganda War - Lies, Lies and More Lies. [88 words]JaladhiDec 27, 2005 14:44
"Truth in news dispensing" laws needed? [284 words]Merry WhitneyDec 27, 2005 14:15
Muslims don't blame their culture for worldwide Islamic terrorism! [243 words]Nonie DarwishDec 27, 2005 12:57
Another form of terrorism [414 words]Kenneth S. BesigDec 27, 2005 12:52
Counter-strategy [100 words]VijayDec 27, 2005 12:33
Information in the Muslim World [207 words]Paul BowmanDec 27, 2005 12:20
The Qur'an says: "Disbelievers are liars" (16.39) [124 words]AyeshaDec 27, 2005 14:44
They use lies , selective info and cover ups [385 words]N. KhanDec 28, 2005 15:12
Reply to N. Khan on "They use lies , selective info and cover ups" [95 words]Rachelle AssoulineJan 2, 2006 13:44
Response to Racchelle Assouline [196 words]N. KhanJan 5, 2006 13:26
Adequate Solution Needed [170 words]David BaschDec 27, 2005 12:06
حملة العداء ضد الصحافة الغربية أقوى منها [341 words]mohamed.mDec 27, 2005 12:03
PropAganda [45 words]Barry WolfeDec 27, 2005 11:59

Comment on this item

Name
Email Address (optional)
Title of Comments
Comments:

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

See the 25 most recent outstanding comments.

Back to top of page