69 million page views

At least there is hope that China will moderate its views.

Reader comment on item: White House Nonchalance toward the Middle East
in response to reader comment: NSS

Submitted by Jason (United States), Mar 23, 2006 at 10:54

If given the choice, China is definitely the better option. At least China is moing toward more individual liberty. Yes, it has been in fits and starts, but let's compare China today to the China of the Nixon trip. Big difference.

In the long term, I think China has a greater chance of becoming a partner rather than an adversary. You can't have economic freedom without political freedom. Increasing the former automatically leads to the latter. In the Muslim world, there is neither economic or political freedom. That is why China will change peacefully of its own accord, but the Islamofacists will have to be changed violently, by a Western boot.
Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)