69 million page views

Taquiya and Oaths

Reader comment on item: Islamists, Get Out
in response to reader comment: Taqiyya and Kitman: The role of Deception in Islamic Terrorism

Submitted by stranchan (Pakistan), Jun 12, 2012 at 02:38

I read with interest your post about Taqiya and Kitman. You are right, they originated in order to allow Shiites to protect themselves from Sunni murderers. It was introduced in such a way that it meant you could lie if it were in defense of a life (interesting that there is no similar edict in other religions). Then it expanded to include lying in defense of another Muslim, or in defense of Islam. Apparently much is justified in the name of Islam. Also, I read that if a Muslim swears an oath, the penalty for breaking it is pittance, some sort of fasting for a few days. So that does not bode well for any testimonies in court either.


Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)