1 readers online now  |  69 million page views
Join Daniel Pipes' trip to Dubai & Abu Dhabi, Nov. 4-11. Click HERE for details.

Where will we find peace?

Reader comment on item: Hating Valentine's Day
in response to reader comment: Re: "Is Islam peaceful and peaceloving. What do Islams most authoritative documents say?"

Submitted by Lactantius Jr (United Kingdom), Mar 9, 2007 at 19:21

To Omar

I'm not an expert either Omar, just a very ordinary man who has met a very extraordinary God Who has completely changed my life, and Who has given me the joyful task of telling others about Him.

Allow me to thank you for taking the trouble to submit the Internet resources you did, which prompt me to respond by saying followers of the Lord Jesus Christ do not object to sincere, critical scrutiny and analyses of their Scriptures and convictions. In fact, in a way we welcome them, because they challenge us to be sure of what we believe, and no true follower of the Lord Jesus Christ would want to believe things incapable of withstanding critical analysis, the New Testament telling us to

"Be always ready to give a reason for the hope you have within you, but do so with gentleness and respect."

1 Peter 3:15

We do however take offence at the late Ahmed Deedat's style, whose many publications contained much which do nothing but pervert and distort the evidences for the Christian Faith, and which are calculated to injure our feelings, and I am persuaded that most Muslims would feel the same way about any Christian publication that distorted Islam the way Mr Deedat distorted and degraded Christianity, and there are many Muslims in South Africa who expressed their keen disapproval of such publications, with one local Muslim magazine saying this of Mr Deedat's methods:-

"It is a well-known fact throughout South Africa, even among evangelical Christian circles, that in so far as Mr Ahmed Deedat in particular is concerned, the Muslim community of South Africa is not in total agreement with his method of propagating Islam. The Muslim digest itself provides ample testimony for having been reluctantly compelled over the years to condemn in no uncertain terms the method of Mr Deedat's propagation of Islam, especially among Christians. No less has Mr Deedat been condemned by responsible Muslim religious bodies and individuals for the manner in which he propagates Islam that results in ill-will being generated against Muslims."

The Muslim Digest Jul/Aug/Sept ....1984

The central fact on which Christianity bases its claim to validity, is the resurrection from the dead of the Lord Jesus Christ, following His crucifixion, and true prophet that He was, on 18 occasions He prophesied in great detail that He was to die by crucifixion, and on 8 of those occasions, He prophesied that He would rise from the dead, these prophecies being part of the New Testament Scriptures, which the Qur'an repeatedly gives witness and support to, for example,

"Let the people of the Gospel judge by what Allah hath revealed therein. If any do fail to judge by (the light of) what Allah hath revealed, they are (no better than) those who rebel."

Surah 5:47

"If only they had stood fast by the Law, the Gospel, and all the revelation that was sent to them from their Lord, they would have enjoyed happiness from every side. There is from among them a party on the right course: but many of them follow a course that is evil."

Surah 5:66

"Say: 'O People of the Book! ye have no ground to stand upon unless ye stand fast by the Law, the Gospel, and all the revelation that has come to you from your Lord.' It is the revelation that cometh to thee from thy Lord, that increaseth in most of them their obstinate rebellion and blasphemy. But sorrow thou not over (these) people without Faith."

Surah 5:68

The mighty Apostle Paul, after detailing all Jesus' many post-resurrection appearances, emphasised the centrality of Jesus' resurrection from the dead, by saying:-

"And if Jesus wasn't raised from the dead, my preaching's useless, and so is your trust in God."

1 Corinthians 15:14

For many years, Mr Deedat promoted a theory that the Lord Jesus Christ was indeed crucified, denying Surah 4:157 in doing so, but was taken down from the Cross alive. It was often remarked that Mr Deedat was promoting a Qadiani theory, approved only by the Ahmadiyya movement, which the Islamic Republic of Pakistan has declared to be a non-Muslim minority sect. Mr Deedat's "swoon theory" must therefore be deplored by Christians and Muslims alike, and this has been expressed as follows by Mohamed Bana of Durban, South Africa.

"Mr Deedat is fond of making lectures about other denominations, but very seldom on Islam. He seems to have a fixed notion about Jesus' crucifixion. In his lectures, he hardly gave the Islamic viewpoint, or seldom the Christian viewpoint, thus confusing his audience. I believe he likes to make the Qadianis of this country very happy by mostly giving their viewpoint, that Jesus, after being put on the Cross, swooned. Now why should Mr Deedat tell his audience that Jesus was put on the Cross and he swooned, because nowhere does the Qur'an speak of Jesus being put on the Cross and swooning? Mr Deedat is the only person who can tell us whether he is preaching either the Christian doctrine, the Muslim doctrine, or the Qadiani doctrine.

Mohammed Bana "Allegations Confirmed" page 3

Mr Deedat, cannot now say which doctrine he was preaching, having died on the morning of 8th.August 2005 in South Africa, his death being reported by Durban's "Daily News"

http://www.dailynews.co.za/index.php?fSectionId=499&fArticleId=2821604

Knowing the centrality of the Lord Jesus' glorious resurrection from the dead, the late Mr Deedat, often attacked His resurrection, on one occasion on Good Friday in Australia, Good Friday being the day on which Christians recall and mark the Lord Jesus Christ's crucifixion, Mr Deedat attacked Jesus' resurrection with such vilification, he was threatened with deportation, by even the secular Australian Government, and I now give further information about that, quoting verbatim from:-

"Deedat's Downfall"

http://answering-islam.org/Responses/Deedat/downfall.htm

"Many readers have been asking whether Ahmed Deedat, the Muslim debater, is still alive. As of this writing (July 2005) he is alive, but he cannot speak and he is completely paralysed. In fact, Deedat has been in this condition since he suffered a rare kind of stroke nine years ago. Few people outside his home city of Durban are aware of this, and even fewer, know the sequence of events leading to this tragedy.

Four weeks before Deedat was stricken, he attacked the crucifixion and resurrection of Christ in front of a large audience in Australia. These provocative lectures "raised the ire of the Australian government", causing them to "threaten to deport him unless he toned down the content of his Good Friday lecture in Sydney." (Daily News, Durban, 6 May 1996) Incidentally, Deedat's inflammatory reputation caused Singapore to ban him from entering their country.

If a secular entity like the Australian government was so offended, what was the Christian church feeling? And more importantly what were they doing about it? Following is the record of how Christians responded in Durban where Deedat founded and directed the Islamic Propagation Centre International.

The publication of Deedat's book "Combat Kit" (1992) marked the beginning of the end. This vicious and ridiculing attack on the Bible set in motion events which proved to be Deedat's undoing. During the next year, a small group of Christians prayed about these provocations. Finally, I wrote Mr. Deedat a personal letter, in which I refuted two of his most vile and vicious attacks. He did not acknowledge receiving the hand-delivered letter — much less answer it.

[This personal letter is now displayed here. An expanded rebuttal which correlates with this letter has been available on this page already since 1996. This article reports about another visit to Deedat that is related to the same issue.]

In the following months, a group of nearly two dozen pastors from many different churches and denominations, deliberated and prayed about these mocking attacks on the Holy Bible. They decided to issue a stern public rebuke through an open letter in the Daily News of Durban. They warned him of God's judgement because Deedat refused to retract his defamatory and unscholarly attacks against the Bible.

[See this page for a reproduction of the open letter.]

This confrontation — and the stroke that Deedat suffered 21 months later — is reminiscent of another confrontation between the apostle Paul and Elymas, the sorcerer. We read that Paul sharply rebuked him, "O full of all deceit and all fraud, you son of the devil, you enemy of all righteousness, will you not cease perverting the straight ways of the Lord? And now indeed, the hand of the Lord is upon you, and you shall be blind, not seeing the sun for a time." Acts 13:10,11 It should not surprise us that God vindicated his holiness by striking Elymas with temporary blindness. So also with Deedat: he suffered a severe stroke, rendering him speechless and paralysed.

God declares in his word, "Whoever stubbornly refuses to accept criticism will suddenly be broken beyond repair." Proverbs 29:1

Some readers might object to this line of reasoning, arguing that the stroke happened 21 months after the rebuke was issued. They would argue that there is no cause/effect relationship. However, the Bible (and also the Qur'an) clearly teach that God does not always punish sin immediately Romans 2:1-4; surah 16:61. He shows forbearance and patience. God gave Deedat ample time to repent. It seems more than coincidental that Deedat was struck down four weeks after mocking the crucifixion in his Autralia lecture tour, climaxing with another attack on Good Friday, the highest commemorative day of Christianity. We believe that the stroke which silenced Deedat was an act of judgment, timed by God to happen on the heels of this broadside attack against the cornerstone doctrine of salvation. This particular provocation needs to be understood against the backdrop of Deedat's repeated disregard to refutations and finally to a public warning. His mouth was shut and continues to be shut as long as he remains obstinate.

The rest of the article may be read at:-

http://answering-islam.org/Responses/Deedat/downfall.htm

You quote the "Jews for Allah" website, which is interesting, given the antipathy to Jews in the Muslim world, dating from Muhammad's day, because the Jews then would not accept his claims to prophecy, and they did so with very good reason, Muhammad just did not continue in the line of Biblical prophets, preaching a message most unlike theirs.

Muhammad is Islam, he sets the genetic code for it, and Islam stands or falls on Muhammad. The heart of the matter is still the same Omar, is Muhammad a prophet of the Biblical God, does his message line-up with that revealed through the Biblical Prophets of the Old Testament? and I have previously commented on Sam Shamouns Open Challenge to Shabir Ally to ‘Debate me on the credibility of your prophet.' which Shabir has been avoiding since November 2001. http://www.answering-islam.org/Responses/Shabir-Ally/challenge.htm and I invite you again Omar, and other readers who would like this most important debate to go ahead, to contact Shabir at the Toronto Dawa Center comments@islaminfo.com, asking him why he is avoiding taking this debate, which would bring together two of the best debaters from Christianity and Islam, thus allowing the evidence for and against Muhammad's prophetic credentials to be publicly examined, and weighed in the balance.

In suggesting I need to talk to an Imam. you presuppose I am unable to make a judgement about Islam and its message myself. Is Islam such that ordinary people like me and you are unable to come to a decision ourselves? do we really need the help of imams. Surely not Omar, surely you and I are able to look at the life, the teaching and the preaching of Muhammad ourselves, and decide ourselves whether we want to commit ourselves to Muhammad and his Islam? and I am suspicious with good reason I believe, of some eloquent Muslim living in the West doing a snow-job on a naive and lazy Western audience, or trying to innovate and re-invent Islam into a more benign peaceful and peaceloving religion.

I believe in letting Muhammad speak for Muhammad, letting the Sahi Hadith of Bukhari and Muslim speak for themselves, and letting the Sirat and Tarikh literature speak for themselves, much preferring to read scholars such as Ibn Kathir whose Qur'anic Tafsir and Hadith scholarship are rightly famous, and who had no need to fool an audience, and present Islam as something it wasn't, in order to gain its acceptance.

You mention you are a 21 years old student, and you are right to give your best shot to your studies Omar, but do please make time to read the Bible, the Qur'an says you can trust it, and the Gospel of John clearly describes Who the Lord Jesus Christ is, and what He offers to those who ask Him onto their case. The Apostle John so clearly describes why he wrote what he did:-

"The disciples saw Jesus do many other miraculous signs in addition to the ones recorded in this book. But these are written so that you may continue to believe that Jesus is the Messiah, the Son of God, and that by believing in Him you will have life by the power of His name."

John 20:30-31

You can read the Bible online at http://www.biblegateway.com and I suggest you read it in a modern English rendering such as the New Living Translation or the Contemporary English Version, but whichever translation you use Omar, it's still the best news you'll ever read, about God's rescue plan to give us what we can't obtain for ourselves, which is life in all its fullness now, and life that never ends. Guaranteed. That's the deal Omar. Do you want it?

With kind regards and best wishes

Lactantius Jr


Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Submitting....

Submit a comment on this item

<< Previous Comment      Next Comment >>

Reader comments (164) on this item

Title Commenter Date Thread
something valentine, somthing musilm [73 words]some muslim guyFeb 14, 2011 12:46182663
of course islamists hate Valentine's Day, it is about love ! [197 words]Phil GreendJun 7, 2009 23:16156988
Valentine is not about love but an excessive lust [240 words]WildanFeb 12, 2010 04:42156988
pity [97 words]ShaimaFeb 14, 2010 08:19156988
responding to of course islamist hate valentines day it is about love/ by phil greend [175 words]mister omalleyAug 12, 2012 17:34156988
Valentine is nothing but consumerism and cheap sex [79 words]Right!Jan 19, 2009 22:36148476
2we must come out from mental slavery of west [68 words]syed mohammad aliFeb 19, 2008 07:46120517
1Culture Killer [137 words]A Fed-Up MalayAug 28, 2009 16:00120517
1Valentines Day [97 words]T.J.Jun 27, 2007 01:42101675
NOT HATING BUT WHY 1 PATICULAR DAY... [440 words]merziyahFeb 19, 2007 10:5977917
Well-said. (End) [8 words]Omar KajFeb 25, 2007 16:2077917
SO RIGHT!!!! [16 words]SaraOct 27, 2007 12:4777917
Would you fast on ramadhan? [129 words]Amy/Amina MyerFeb 12, 2008 14:0377917
I don't get it [88 words]AnonymousOct 28, 2008 18:0777917
Totally Agree [60 words]Oduniyi YunusFeb 14, 2009 03:0777917
Valentine beheaded [49 words]JJJosephFeb 14, 2007 20:5877250
What's the problem? [200 words]Neill WylieFeb 14, 2007 14:1877191
who are you describing [25 words]TerryFeb 24, 2007 18:3077191
Re: who are you describing [12 words]OmarFeb 28, 2007 08:3777191
observations [63 words]pattyomalleyAug 17, 2012 09:4577191
Commercial Day [132 words]AhmadFeb 14, 2007 01:5277127
Educate yourself [135 words]SarahFeb 12, 2007 21:3376966
Valentine's Day = Roman origin [96 words]Omar KajFeb 14, 2007 12:0076966
Valentine's day [98 words]JoJoFeb 15, 2007 15:3276966
Re: Valentine's day [82 words]Omar KajFeb 20, 2007 12:4376966
how pathetic.... [126 words]donvanNov 29, 2007 16:3076966
Nothing surprises me anymore. [31 words]KathyFeb 10, 2007 08:0676698
Moral Policing [330 words]XXXFeb 16, 2006 04:0435900
Valentine's Day Unneeded by Moslem [92 words]HusniFeb 12, 2006 21:2735304
valentines day [140 words]sushmaFeb 14, 2006 01:1635304
Moslems MUST and ALWAYS love other Moslems........... [100 words]TimothyFeb 19, 2007 22:0135304
tolerating traditions [36 words]MrxFeb 22, 2007 03:4535304
WHAT !? [187 words]TimothyFeb 22, 2007 21:5135304
normal response [168 words]TerryFeb 24, 2007 18:2335304
What can I say [6 words]TerryFeb 24, 2007 18:3335304
Think [342 words]Rehman Baig MirzaApr 1, 2007 09:4035304
Not Agree with this tradition! [7 words]Gul NabiFeb 12, 2008 21:5235304
Valentine's day an unislamic tradition [163 words]Seeme NazirFeb 14, 2008 08:3835304
Valentine's Day boycot is muslim country reason. [115 words]faiz khanFeb 1, 2006 01:3633365
Re: Valentine's Day boycott is muslim country reason. [38 words]Omar KajMar 1, 2007 13:2033365
valentine day-islam- muslim festivals [336 words]fiazfaziliFeb 14, 2008 05:3633365
No problem! [183 words]NeenaDec 30, 2005 14:3330800
Valentine's day in Mumbai, India [359 words]K. AgarwalMar 28, 2005 17:2021192
What will they ban next? Christmas? [18 words]SeemaFeb 10, 2009 12:5521192
Hating Valentine's Day [75 words]PatFeb 11, 2005 14:4820274
valentine - and so what [112 words]meenaFeb 16, 2006 09:4720274
Valentine's Day [43 words]JonathanMar 8, 2004 21:4014121
Valentine is totally against the islamic teachings [226 words]SalimMar 6, 2007 06:0314121
Muslims [116 words]Proud to be an infidel!Jul 27, 2007 04:2914121
reply [44 words]salimJul 28, 2007 06:5814121
Not so simple [319 words]Arun GuptaMar 1, 2004 21:3714034
4Malaysian Muslim Hypocrites [174 words]Tom PetersFeb 28, 2004 04:4014015
Behaviour of people [158 words]LeoMay 16, 2006 21:1414015
individuality [123 words]dfwhite19438Feb 12, 2007 15:4914015
beyond belief [116 words]TerryFeb 24, 2007 18:4614015
accusation [87 words]mirandaNov 26, 2007 09:4614015
Get the fact right [104 words]ConsuellaMar 30, 2009 09:3114015
Valentine's Day [231 words]MLJulia SalletteFeb 22, 2004 16:1413966
Islam is TRUTH: [89 words]YusufFeb 20, 2004 04:1413943
Holiday Based On A Certain Christian Saint [108 words]AnneMFeb 18, 2007 17:3913943
What is the point? [111 words]DagmarFeb 19, 2004 16:3413939
In the dark [33 words]TedFeb 19, 2004 16:2913938
Valentine's Day [135 words]Harden ErvinFeb 18, 2004 08:2413920
"200 arrested in Mina for celebrating Valentine's Day" [43 words]Adam GreavesFeb 17, 2004 23:5313917
Be more Mature [185 words]DibFeb 14, 2006 01:4313917
Governments and their people [19 words]Muhammad SiddiquiFeb 17, 2004 23:3913916
no need for valentine's Day [28 words]mounirFeb 19, 2006 11:3813916
Opposition to Valentine's Day is not hate [164 words]Project2012Feb 17, 2004 19:1713913
So what? [91 words]Peter J. HerzFeb 17, 2004 18:3413912
Commenter Peter J. Hertz has missed the point [176 words]Adam GreavesFeb 17, 2004 23:3413912
Sorry [169 words]TerryFeb 24, 2007 19:3913912
Traditional Jews have problems with Valentine's day too [93 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
MoFeb 17, 2004 17:0113911
Re: Daniel Pipes replies: [56 words]OmarFeb 28, 2007 09:0613911
Off the point [149 words]TerryMar 1, 2007 15:5213911
Down With Love [173 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
J. Keen HollandFeb 17, 2004 16:3213909
Boycott of Valentine's Day in Muslim countries [92 words]A.AFeb 17, 2004 13:5713905
VD [215 words]KalsoomFeb 13, 2006 11:4013905
Valentine's day [15 words]hadiFeb 8, 2009 20:1813905
Valentine's Day - the 'Indian Reaction' [398 words]O.K. SudeshFeb 17, 2004 13:4513904
Happy Valentine day 2007 [766 words]Mike GhosueFeb 14, 2007 11:3613904
Another Point to Be Made [187 words]Debbie WallsFeb 17, 2004 13:2513903
Valentines day and islam [73 words]Dan KatcherFeb 17, 2004 12:5513901
1ISLAM IS A PERFECT WAY OF LIFE [82 words]abdul muiizFeb 12, 2006 19:4113901
dk [21 words]samiaFeb 13, 2006 11:5513901
valentines day in islam? [271 words]masoodFeb 9, 2007 12:3613901
2"Some examples why Islam is not a perfect way of life" [355 words]Lactantius Jr.Feb 18, 2007 19:5513901
Not holding my breath [299 words]TerryFeb 24, 2007 19:1313901
Re: "Some examples why Islam is not a perfect way of life" [3166 words]Omar KajFeb 28, 2007 17:0613901
"Is Islam peaceful and peaceloving. What do Islams most authoritative documents say?" [2748 words]Lactantius Jr.Mar 5, 2007 18:1913901
Re: "Is Islam peaceful and peaceloving. What do Islams most authoritative documents say?" [92 words]OmarMar 7, 2007 08:1113901
part 2 [933 words]OmarMar 8, 2007 02:4313901
Where will we find peace? [2281 words]Lactantius JrMar 9, 2007 19:2113901
THINK A LITTLE!!! [193 words]SaraOct 27, 2007 12:4013901
"Give us some examples of just how peaceful Muhammad was" [43 words]Lactantius Jr.Nov 6, 2007 11:4013901
Lactantius Jr. [202 words]abdul muiizNov 27, 2007 14:4113901
Here we go again, the usual moslem resort [20 words]KlewNov 27, 2007 20:2813901
Please explain [65 words]Lactantius Jr.Nov 28, 2007 04:0213901
ramble on.... [162 words]donvanNov 28, 2007 17:0213901
in your words [57 words]abdul muiizNov 30, 2007 02:5613901
Please give us some examples of just how peaceful and peaceloving Muhammad was [66 words]Lactantius JrDec 19, 2007 05:3813901
understanding! [58 words]abdul muiizDec 19, 2007 23:3313901
still waiting [14 words]abdul muiizDec 19, 2007 23:4013901
2"Do Islam's most authoritative documents say Muhammad was a terrorist?" [2990 words]Lactantius JrJan 14, 2008 16:0513901
Lactantius Jr "Do Islam's most authoritative documents say Muhammad was a terrorist?" [1903 words]abdul muiizJan 17, 2008 19:2213901
Does "Islam" mean peace? was Islam spread by the sword? was Muhammad a terrorist? [170 words]Lactantius Jr.Feb 4, 2008 15:1413901
sad [186 words]nadiaMar 3, 2008 06:1313901
"Glad not sad" [3975 words]Lactantius Jr.Mar 9, 2008 16:1913901
Lactantius Jr. ..............even nadia (15yrs old) knows! [23 words]abdul muiizApr 23, 2008 17:0113901
Lactantius Jr.....bully? [184 words]abdul muiizApr 23, 2008 17:1913901
Our dear Abdul Muiiz rabina yu3alimuhu al-lugha al-3arabiya [188 words]dhimmi no moreApr 24, 2008 07:0713901
"Lactantius Jr.................bully?" a response [252 words]Lactantius Jr.Apr 24, 2008 17:2613901
now we can have a productive debate, Lactantius Jr [90 words]abdul muiizApr 24, 2008 19:4613901
response [342 words]NadiaApr 25, 2008 01:0113901
Our dear abd al-mu3iz and his big time falsafa [217 words]dhimmi no moreApr 25, 2008 06:5113901
"Response with corrections" [600 words]Lactantius JrApr 27, 2008 15:4413901
"Let amicable discussion continue" [153 words]Lactantius Jr.Apr 27, 2008 15:4913901
like i said [32 words]NadiaMay 1, 2008 04:2913901
Dhimmi no more, you want my time, OK, hope you can handle it, " Our dear Abdul Muiiz rabina yu3alimuhu al-lugha al-3arabiy'" [530 words]abdul muiizMay 2, 2008 17:0213901
Our dear 3Abd al-mu3iz [69 words]dhimmi no moreMay 3, 2008 08:5313901
"knowing religion and knowing Jesus Christ" [186 words]Lactantius Jr.May 3, 2008 17:1313901
lantatius jr , lantatius jr [30 words]abdul muiizMay 3, 2008 17:5913901
" Our dear Abdul Muiiz rabina yu3alimuhu al-lugha al-3arabiy'" response 2 [124 words]abdul muiizMay 3, 2008 20:2113901
Our dear 3Abd al-mu3iz you still did not answer my question [31 words]dhimmi no moreMay 3, 2008 21:2813901
Does "Islam mean peace?" [445 words]Lactantius JrMay 6, 2008 17:3513901
1"Was Islam Spread By The Sword?" [4489 words]Lactantius JrMay 6, 2008 17:4613901
3"Let There Be No Compulsion In Religion" [1732 words]Lactantius Jr.May 6, 2008 17:5913901
2"Islam is the fastest growing religion in America and Europe" a response [564 words]Lactanius Jr.May 6, 2008 18:0713901
dissolving your assertions [44 words]abdul muiizMay 7, 2008 16:1313901
Does "Islam mean peace?"....abdul muiizs' response to Lanctantius Jr [141 words]abdul muiizMay 8, 2008 12:0913901
the fastest growing religion in world [49 words]muhamedJan 21, 2010 11:1713901
Awesome!! [20 words]AgentblackdiamondFeb 16, 2010 05:0013901
1"Even more Awesome" [484 words]Lactantius JrFeb 17, 2010 18:0813901
Why does Islam provide a "complete way of life," and Christianity doesn't? [34 words]Lactantius JrFeb 20, 2010 12:0313901
Come to Istanbul and see [109 words]CorakApr 1, 2010 19:2013901
late reply [41 words]AgentblackdiamondFeb 18, 2011 05:0313901
islam [17 words]adnanDec 28, 2012 04:1613901
Islam & Valentine's Day [66 words]Mark AlexanderFeb 17, 2004 10:3213898
Restricting valentine day is not paranoia [247 words]saima sadiaJan 28, 2006 12:5313898
Americans' need to feel loved by everyone on earth [53 words]paul gilbertFeb 13, 2006 05:1713898
Open Mind [16 words]Abdul RahmanFeb 15, 2006 05:0913898
Valentine-phobia [237 words]JoshFeb 15, 2007 16:1013898
Valentine Day Nonsense!!!! [88 words]Proud IndianFeb 16, 2007 01:2013898
hello [25 words]SalimMar 7, 2007 05:2313898
Valentines Day [15 words]T.J.Jun 27, 2007 02:3713898
Anti-Valentine's Day [16 words]Qareena KarimFeb 8, 2008 10:2513898
why should valentine? [40 words]denisFeb 10, 2009 21:5713898
valentines day [57 words]kianiFeb 14, 2009 04:5413898
don't celebrate valentine day [11 words]shahid akhtar khanFeb 13, 2010 17:4413898
1Valentine's Day - You Missed on This One [89 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Brian KheelFeb 17, 2004 10:2013897
Insight [13 words]WPLVFeb 17, 2004 09:1913895
The need for perspective [63 words]S. FeldmanFeb 17, 2004 09:0613894
RE: The need for perspective [265 words]R.L.Feb 18, 2004 14:3013894
WHAT ARE U AFRAID OF [115 words]KathyFeb 10, 2007 08:2513894
Re: WHAT ARE U AFRAID OF [82 words]Omar KajFeb 18, 2007 02:4713894
Repetition [80 words]TerryFeb 24, 2007 19:2113894
Terry, have a reality check [190 words]Omar KajFeb 25, 2007 15:3913894
P.S. ... [46 words]Omar KajFeb 26, 2007 01:5213894
reality check [72 words]TerryFeb 26, 2007 16:4513894
Re: reality check [307 words]Omar KajFeb 27, 2007 03:4813894
By the way... [42 words]Omar LakMar 1, 2007 13:4913894
what drivel [127 words]TerryMar 1, 2007 15:3913894
End of story [72 words]TerryMar 1, 2007 18:1113894
Re: what drivel [259 words]OmarMar 2, 2007 08:2613894
"none of which would convince or even interest you? [104 words]OmarMar 2, 2007 09:5013894

Comment on this item

Name
Email Address (optional)
Title of Comments
Comments:

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

See recent outstanding comments.

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

ADVERTISEMENTS

eXTReMe Tracker

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2017 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum. Daniel J. Pipes