69 million page views

Islam's expansion to defend the caravans

Reader comment on item: Destroying Sculptures of Muhammad
in response to reader comment: Mansoor: A correction to your madrassa history about Raja Dahir and Mohammed bin Qasim

Submitted by Prashant (United States), Jul 26, 2012 at 00:42

Dear Dr Pipes,

I learned some new history today from one of your readers. I learned the reason why way, way, back about one thousand years ago Muslims of Baghdad attacked the Hindu/Buddhist kingdom of Sindh. We are told that Muslims --as always-- were the peace loving sea going merchants and the Hindu king was supporting the sea pirates. So the Muslims had to attack Sindh to teach the ruler of Sindh a lesson.

You see, Dr Pipes, haven't we heard this reason before. Did not Muhammad also attack the the-then non-Muslim inhabitants of Arabia because they used to attack Muslim's caravan? Look, how far Islam as come just defending their caravans from other other people. What else was destroyed to teach a lesson for attacking a caravan? Did not George Bush attack Saddam Hussain's caravan going into Kuwait in 1992? What happened after that?

Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2023 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)