69 million page views

More Taqiyya?

Reader comment on item: Canada's Muslims, Not of One Mind
in response to reader comment: A blind man??? mmm...

Submitted by Peter Hall (Australia), Dec 12, 2011 at 23:18

So now Slayhy, you are doing a back flip and have changed your story from the murderer was soooo scared of Mohammed's punishment, and how you went into great detail telling us of his fear, to the tried and true lie or it was a weak hadith? Do I have to remind you of your earlier excuse? Or was your earlier response a weak and unreliable response? Well Slayhy? Where does it say he was blind? Where does it say Mohammed was away? Or is that more Taqiyya?

Is that what you are trying to tell us now? Why not Blame the Israelis? Or The Americans? You seem to like doing that when you do not have a real answer.

It was written by MUSLIMS Slayhy, not by people who hate Islam, and the only weak headed person here is you for thinking your obvious lies will go unnoticed, the weak prey here is you.

If it is untrue why have Muslims repeated the story for centuries? You are trying to hide the fact that Mohammed did not punish the Murder of an unarmed woman in her sleep because he wanted her dead. That is the uncomfortable fact you have gone to great lengths to avoid.

What is does show is that no Hadiths are reliable and the Qu'ran is not reliable, you are totally uneducated about your own religion and its texts, when you are confronted with the evil acts of Mohammed recorded in your own religious texts, you go and search the web for a Muslim Apologist who has some lame excuse for weak headed fools like you to believe.

Try educating yourself Slayhy, why not read the following as a starting point.


Maybe the light will dawn and you will finally see what everybody else does ...

Educate yourself and stop being a puppet.


Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2023 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)