1 readers online now  |  69 million page views

Yes, to the term "Islamists"

Reader comment on item: "At War with Islamic Fascists"

Submitted by J.S. (Canada), Aug 22, 2006 at 16:44

I think the term "Islamist" is the best choice (for now, anyway). I recall reading a text by a NPR person (book was published in the early 90s?). She seemed to be one of those types in love with radical Islam (I'm always puzzled by why these NPR types don't convert).. As I recall, she interviewed some radical Islamist. Interestingly, the Islamist was very offended by the term "terrorist" -- he claimed that "violence" wasn't always necessary; that is, nation states could be destroyed just as easily through peaceful means (demographics, politics, pro-Islamist education, propaganda, etc.), as they could be through violent means.

Thus, an Islamist does not necessarily engage in "terrorism;" he could be a "pacifist" (but working with the same agenda -- destruction of the West, turning democracies into Islamic states, etc.). (Another problem with the term "fascist" is that it would tend to bring to mind the Red Scare of the 50s (the threat of the Communists, all a big "hoax" -- spread by the hysterics -- people like Joe McCarthy, etc.), thus, it may be best to avoid the term "fascist."

Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Comment on this item

Mark my comment as a response to Yes, to the term "Islamists" by J.S.

Email me if someone replies to my comment

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

See recent outstanding comments.

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List
eXTReMe Tracker

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2020 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)