Annan and UN--both have to go!

Submitted by Sadhashiv Thorat (United States), Dec 14, 2005 at 11:12

Several (Philip Landau, joyce, etc) have asked why Annan is still at the head of the UN. Unfortunately, Annan is only symptomatic of the entire organisation. It was formed from the debris of the LN (which, formed after WW1, had failed to prevent WW2 and its horrors) and never learned from its predecessor's mistakes. Any chance of it doing so (not sure there ever was) was irretrievably lost with Hammarskjold.

The UN should be disbanded at once--as it has proven itself to be a blight (and not only by taking up the illegitimate cause of the Edomites aka "Palestinians"--who are also SCRIPTURALLY proscribed from ever re-establishing themselves as a nation)!!!!!

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".