Re. Swahili Dinez

Submitted by Daisy (United States), Jul 28, 2005 at 22:16

"...saying how Islam does not condone violence against the innocent (in the context of the London blasts) while at the same time actively supporting terrorists under the false premise of Islamic victimhood!"

It's important to remember that 'infidels' are never to be considered innocent by Islamists. The real deceit lies in not mentioning this in the loud, yet insignificant condemnations stating "Islam does not condone violence againt the innocent". Perhaps that's true if 'innocent' means a Muslim in (temporary) good standing with other, more powerful Muslims. However, and very importantly, it appears that Islamism does indeed condone violence aginst the guilty .. that would be the rest of us.

Mr. Dinez eloquently brings our attention to the horrific violence enacted by Islamists in Jammu and Kashmir. We must keep in mind that the violence against those "guilty" of the crime of not being paying members of the Islamofascistic movement is being enacted in the North, South, East and West. The intention of world domination becomes clear when we see this phenomena as not exclusively being in oppostion to Western values.

For those of us who would like to learn more about Kashmir's plight, what could you direct us to read, Mr. Dinez?

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".