35 readers online now

99,084 comments by 26,318 readers

Go to Mobile Site

Trust no Muslim Brotherhood
Reader comment on item: Why Revoke Tariq Ramadan's U.S. Visa?

Submitted by Nonie Darwish (United States), Aug 28, 2004 at 00:39

I was born and raised in Egypt and I know how subversive and dangerous the Muslim Brotherhood can be. It is simply a terrorist organization. Just its name can scare many Egyptians. America should never shy from rejecting visas to any suspicious Muslim fanatic regardless of how Westernized he might appear.

Why would our State Department welcome suspicious figures who fled their countries of origin for being subversive? It is time for the State Department to realize that not everything can be resolved with diplomacy. The Egyptian "Muslim Brotherhood" has caused much subversion, assassinations and turmoil in Egypt and exported these means to many other Muslim countries and Europe. Dangerous figures that do not want to call Bin Laden a terrorist and a murderer should never be welcomed in America. Muslim terrorist supporters and sympathizers come in many different shapes and forms and many have learned a few tricks that might appeal to certain segments of Western society. Many have lived with Western freedoms and learned to demand their freedom of speech, something they never practiced and actually have participated in oppressing in their own countries.

When will our State Department face the fact that our war against terror will NOT be resolved with diplomacy? Diplomacy might be a side help in our war against terror, but nothing other than our military will win us that war. That is the sad but true fact and reality of the enemy with which we are dealing.

Mr. Ramadan having been born and raised in the West, does not make him loyal to Western culture, but makes him an authority on how to manipulate it to his objectives of conquering the West to Islam. The way members of the Muslim Brotherhood bring up their kids leaves them not much choice but to support the Muslim Brotherhood main principles. They are done destroying the Middle East culture with their hate and extremism and are now coming to give the West the same treatment, but with a gentler appearance. American academics who invite them to poison the minds of our youth are extremely negligent by doing that. Do these Americans really think that these individualsreally love the American way of life? Make no mistake - these figures are here on a mission and it is NOT to please the leftists in America. They are using our naïve anti-American left for their hidden agenda.

American universities and youth do not need to learn anything from such subversive figures and it does not matter how many PhD's they have. Many of them are already teaching hate on our campuses with an Anti-American twist. The PR campaign by Saudi Arabia in the US is not just to reform its image, but it has an Anti-American tone. Welcoming such people in our open society is simply naive to say the least and committing suicide at worst. Haven't we had enough after giving visas to dangerous figures such as Sheikh Omar Abdel Rahaman, Muhammad Attah and others? Mr. Ramadan might have adopted a more clever and gentler approach for the same goal of Jihad in the West. He should never be allowed in America.

Nonie Darwish

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

Submit a comment on this item

Search by Enter name or date
Search Forum Comments:

Reader comments (80) on this item

Title By Date
AustraliaMr [13 words]Peter RobinsonNov 12, 2009 04:37
This is a Misleading Post about Tariq Ramadan [174 words]D.O.Mar 19, 2009 14:37
we must expose those who hate [241 words]Phil GreendJul 10, 2007 11:50
Mr. Pipes, a little clarification on a few of your points? [989 words]Saqib HussainJun 24, 2007 23:42
Ramadan's defense against his visa revocation is nothing short of pathetic [433 words]Roosevelt's DiscipleJun 23, 2007 03:19
Reply to: Ramadan's defense against his visa revocation is nothing short of pathetic [148 words]Saqib HussainJun 25, 2007 02:09
A rose by any other name [52 words]Michael ZacharkoAug 25, 2006 22:46
Ramadan should be kept out of the US...for now [420 words]jason smithMar 29, 2006 15:53
ACLU, TOO [49 words]DEANE LEDSWORTHJan 25, 2006 13:29
it is amazing [200 words]kemalFeb 1, 2006 08:30
not that it matters a lot but... [63 words]matei calinJan 22, 2006 08:45
Tariq is a human with a message [130 words]joanaJul 24, 2007 16:42
An Asault on American's right to HEAR
[w/response] [314 words]
Cole PensingerOct 22, 2007 23:23
It is easy to accuse but... [183 words]S. MirmoojiDec 2, 2005 20:35
Evil Ramadan [61 words]Man de HuNov 13, 2005 14:22
I respond in disappointment to Faqi Hussein [620 words]Ramy RamadanAug 31, 2005 11:39
Prof Ramadan " Oxford's new visiting Professor" [815 words]Faqi HusssainAug 30, 2005 21:57
A very peculiar perspective on Ramadan [490 words]Sean McIntyreJul 22, 2005 17:10
Give me a better reason to keep him out [75 words]Carl LarsonSep 29, 2006 22:43
Ramadan has exactly the same goal as the terrorists, which is to spread islam [100 words]Roosevelt's DiscipleJun 23, 2007 03:28
Tariq Ramadan ... [221 words]Tim HolmesJul 16, 2005 20:31
Gullible Americans [86 words]RichardApr 26, 2005 23:24
Ramadan not a moderate [164 words]JeffApr 26, 2005 16:00
Ramadan, Pipes and Manji [69 words]AliMar 19, 2005 20:29
Show me some proof ... if there is any [248 words]Sylvia WilsonMar 12, 2005 18:25
Tariq Ramadan [35 words]Mary Jane StickleyFeb 1, 2005 11:22
What a Stupid Decision [330 words]Salim ChishtiJan 25, 2005 06:20
Does not make sense [71 words]Maria EvangalistaDec 29, 2004 23:08
And so history repeats itself [212 words]JamzDec 21, 2004 23:34
The absence of proofs [117 words]Darraz ElKhadieDec 16, 2004 11:31
Notre Dame University? [22 words]BobDec 14, 2004 21:14
Laugh or cry... [324 words]Ahmed El ZeinDec 5, 2004 04:49
Bonus: tossing away freedom of expression and association gives "them" less reason to hate us
[w/response] [90 words]
Konrad AdererOct 6, 2004 13:00
It's clear and obvious what Ramadan is guilty of [48 words]Roosevelt's DiscipleJun 23, 2007 03:33
AP Wrote Biased Article... [55 words]A.Oct 1, 2004 17:47
Response from Ramadan himself [50 words]ThermanSep 24, 2004 14:07
Good for America [39 words]K SalehSep 17, 2004 13:23
Any free thinkers in da house? [201 words]Mohammad SyedSep 17, 2004 12:46
Is this evidence? /DHS has bad strategy if in good faith [151 words]Special gSep 13, 2004 11:58
Thank you! [70 words]Katheryn ScottSep 9, 2004 12:45
McCarthyism Lives [51 words]Brian McBrideSep 8, 2004 18:39
Every person is judged and two persons never got the same chance [70 words]Magnus AnderssonNov 6, 2007 21:32
Too quick to judge, too scared to be objective? [173 words]WarrenSep 8, 2004 10:54
Hasn't Colin Powell Had Sufficient Time? [30 words]John RiemanSep 2, 2004 21:16
Now he's back [60 words]Brian MelkunAug 31, 2004 19:22
Rogue State Department? [40 words]Freeper7Aug 31, 2004 18:33
Keep on identifying the enemies within our midst [43 words]James Hellwig, US Dept Commerce (Retired)Aug 30, 2004 14:46
Highly Informative [87 words]AvrahamAug 29, 2004 23:15
What's goin' on at the State Dep't? [189 words]John W McGinleyAug 29, 2004 22:08
Ramadan critique [59 words]T. A. Green (Ted)Aug 29, 2004 17:09
State Dep't vs DHS [51 words]Marjorie LindeeAug 29, 2004 03:20
Ban Ramadan but allow the Saudis free reign? [183 words]Nelson HortonAug 29, 2004 01:16
Cogent [35 words]Howard R. WolfAug 28, 2004 14:40
Good Job! [84 words]Maureen CoteAug 28, 2004 11:15
Repulsive
[w/response] [274 words]
Richard SilversteinAug 28, 2004 01:25
⇒ Trust no Muslim Brotherhood [522 words]Nonie DarwishAug 28, 2004 00:39
What can I do? [87 words]Laurie KursAug 27, 2004 21:00
Superb work [7 words]Alon ReiningerAug 27, 2004 19:29
I agree [12 words]George HAug 27, 2004 15:48
A fine line... [53 words]Lloyd Lionel KleinAug 27, 2004 14:06
What's wrong with the State Dep't? [112 words]Muriel EfronAug 27, 2004 13:38
Islamist Deception [61 words]A readerAug 27, 2004 13:29
ISLAMISM, Mohammad, Quran, Muslims, Dhimmitude, Wahhabism, Jihad [3 words]Chard JeromeAug 27, 2004 11:23
State Dep't must change its ways [199 words]Bernadette KimAug 27, 2004 11:14
Where's the beef? [186 words]Egypt SteveAug 27, 2004 10:55
Other possibilities [36 words]David RomeroAug 27, 2004 10:30
Thanks! [13 words]William KinneyAug 27, 2004 10:24
Enlightening [84 words]LowellAug 27, 2004 09:22
Please continue your efforts [53 words]Martha McGillAug 27, 2004 09:04
Not So Fast ... Tariq [204 words]Arlinda DeAngelisAug 27, 2004 08:41
Wonderful News [27 words]R. Gene PayneAug 27, 2004 08:30
Let's stop shooting ourselves in the foot [180 words]S.F.Gohara, M.D.Aug 27, 2004 08:09
Why not exclude all Germans
[w/response] [70 words]
D HenstridgeAug 11, 2006 18:56
Why did the State Dep't encourage Ramadan to reapply? [19 words]Z TelpnerAug 27, 2004 07:22
There is some justice! [55 words]Harace (Rosinbaum) HammondAug 27, 2004 06:40
Thank you again. Keep 'em coming! [139 words]Menahem DunskyAug 27, 2004 05:47
Who's in charge at State? [73 words]Martin EkremAug 27, 2004 05:02
The works of Tariq Ramadan
[w/response] [129 words]
Shammai FishmanAug 27, 2004 04:08
Thanks [71 words]Tarek AbdelhamidAug 27, 2004 03:22
A good decision but... [119 words]Rachelle AssoulineAug 27, 2004 02:49

Comment on this item

Name
Email Address (optional)
Title of Comments
Comments:

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

See the 25 most recent outstanding comments.

ADVERTISEMENTS

Premium Links by Wikio

Computers
Electronics
Communication
Appliances

eXTReMe Tracker

All materials written by Daniel Pipes on this site © Daniel Pipes. Email: MeqMef@aol.com

You can help support Daniel Pipes' important work by making a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.