69 million page views

Need to know more

Reader comment on item: No Islamic Law in Minnesota, for Now

Submitted by Ivan Cher (Australia), Oct 16, 2006 at 17:53

[1] Who initiated the ban and did the inciting?

[2] Was it all disingenuous and opportunistic, a 'play' to get Sharia establish on a petty issue so that more significant challenges would be harder to resist? Thin edges of exztended wedges?

[3] Tell us more about THE FREE MUSLIMS COALITION. Aren't they [and co-moderates] just the ticket; harbingers of hope worthy of White House respect and government attention, consultation and encouragement.

[4] Note: It seems that, like the Minnesota Airport experience, UK authorities have at last been awakened.

Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)