More blah...blah ...blah from our dear un drained

Submitted by dhimmi no more (United States), Jun 2, 2007 at 07:17

Do you think that maybe Indians did not invade the lands of others because they are more civilized than Muslims/barbarians, and that their gods do not preach hate as Allah does, and that the Gods of Hinduism do not ask for 1/5 of the share of the loot as Allah does? and you tell us ya ayuha al-faylasoof al-kabeer, why would any barbarian would want to invade an Islamic basket case as Afghanistan? India? This is a different story. India had wealth and do you think that this might be the reason why muslims invaded India than let us say invade Berkina Fasso or some other hell hole?

What do you think ya yauha al-fahlawi al-kabeer?

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".