69 million page views

Difference between insanity, terrorism, and politics

Reader comment on item: The Snipers: Crazy or Jihadis?

Submitted by Wendy (Australia), Nov 27, 2002 at 12:17

I confess from the that I am not American (I'm Australian), and nor am I generally big on watching the news, and thus have only followed the sniper case in its broadest outlines.

Although the points in this article are reasonably interesting, the author seems to have forgotten that the acts carried out by the snipers were, by almost anyone's definition, insane.

They were not "foot soldiers in the jihad", and nor were they terrorists.Even if they *believed* themselves to be thus, their beliefs would not make it the case.

Picture the case of a man who *believes* that if he and his followers commit mass suicide they will reap some kind of reward (sorry can't remember exactly what that one was all about) . And he is convincing enough that people believe him, and do in fact kill themselves.

Does this mean that they died because he was the messiah? No, the best you can say is that they died because he was crazy and he *believed* himself to be the messiah, and unfortunately their own mental ...and/or life story allowed them to be vulnerable to this occasionally contagious form of insanity.

Even small, strange, inneffective, yet violent, terrorist cells with goals that hardly anybody really understands are not quite like this. They have each other to bolster up the bizzarre, perhaps immoral or brutal, but generally not completely unreal, notions to which they subscribe. They also generally have agendas of *some* kind, even if they are vague, or if they seem 'insane' to others.

Although I agree that the concept of "jihad", or at least that of the "lesser jihad", is a toxic and potentially dangerous one, I think it is silly to say that it was the *cause* of the attacks. People who are distraught and psychopathic enough to do such a thing may believe themselves to have all sorts of reasons for their actions, and the form these reasons take will derive in some way from their cultural and individual life stories. But this does not make the reasons they believe the *real* reasons. Perhaps we can never quite know the "real" reasons, but I think we can say that they are to do with the individual's psychology and life story, rather than their religious or political affiliations. The religious or political affiliations may influence the *form* of tha attacks, which can be problematic, ie they may for instance attack only 'christians', or only women, or some such, but they are not the 'reason' for them. I'll say it one more time. The 'reason' is the individual's insanity.

It is even possibly that this attack would not have happened if not for, say, the September 11 bombings. But this does not mean that they were both 'caused' by the same thing.

I do not believe that such events as the recent sniper attacks in anyway could be said to 'raise the risk' of attacks from militant Islam. Yes, there are clearly risks of attacks from such quarters, as world events of the last several decades, not to mention the last year and recent weeks, have shown. But I'm pretty sure that even the most militant of terrorists would want to distance themselves from people who leave tarot cards and messages proclaiming themsleves to be god lying around at the scene of the crime.

And now I'll raise my main concern with this article. From my (very limited - I read three articles tonight) reading of the authors work, it seems that he is in general well informed and astute, and in other places he has advocated, for instance, changes to American policy in the Middle East (1986, "Fundamentalist Muslims between America and Russia"). In these articles, although I don't necessarily agree with all of the ideas, I can see that they are well thought out, good ideas. In other words, he had an informed agenda, and he advocated solutions.

But in the article under discussion today, he does not give any solutions, and it's not at all clear to me what his agenda may be.

What could be done to stop such crazy sniper attacks, except to increase security and vigilance (already underway), and possibly things such as counselling, community awareness programs, and so on. Just as we try to do in our schools to reduce shootings there. These things are already being done, presumably. ... And let's face it we're all confused, albeit at different levels, so why add to the mish mash like this?

Of course, another way to reduce such possibilities, if you believed that the reason they did itwas their Islamic background, would be to begin to mistrust all muslims, but I fail to see how this can help.

Well, that's my two cents worth for tonight :) ...
Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Submit a comment on this item

<< Previous Comment      Next Comment >>

Reader comments (103) on this item

Title Commenter Date Thread
Beltway Sniper [52 words]Julie BNov 10, 2009 09:41164337
Murderers [33 words]Ajay Singh ChohanApr 5, 2006 18:1442485
paradise & 72 virgin seekers [72 words]alekMay 12, 2007 04:1442485
Read the articles before you comment [25 words]Malik MubashshirSep 4, 2018 10:1742485
Snipers? [67 words]joeFeb 22, 2006 15:2137082
1Who is to Blame [88 words]JayJan 5, 2006 14:0431117
Misconstrued [204 words]KJul 2, 2005 11:1423070
A great awakening [163 words]lawrence turnerJun 19, 2005 15:2422746
Muslim In The Forces [86 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Ali StricklandApr 1, 2005 16:2821291
Not a sniper [173 words]JoeMay 22, 2004 12:4215316
Pot calling the kettle Black? [48 words]Wendy AmosApr 16, 2004 04:1614728
right back at you [75 words]voiceOct 22, 2006 02:3114728
Clarification [116 words]TruthMay 21, 2003 10:479154
BIN LADEN IS A DECENT MUSLIM. [315 words]NABIHAMar 7, 2003 23:537135
2What does someone stating he is god have to do with the Nation? [365 words]Unike AllahMar 1, 2003 12:146992
What Islam Really Is [81 words]FayezFeb 26, 2003 19:246940
whites should leave arab lands [18 words]chess playerJul 16, 2006 02:266940
Islam is a "religion of peace" [64 words]sw1Sep 13, 2006 22:016940
what peaceful-killers??/ really [92 words]alekMay 16, 2007 04:246940
what [86 words]meNov 18, 2007 05:006940
Bin Laden Is a Decent Moslem [112 words]Samaan SadatJan 24, 2003 21:395959
response to Samaan Sadat [98 words]frankOct 11, 2004 02:385959
1From A Five Percenter's perspective [109 words]"The God"Dec 24, 2002 23:235125
1This man is not a five percenter [91 words]Power Infinite allahDec 14, 2002 12:574615
help, not hurt our black youth [176 words]jessicaFeb 22, 2007 19:494615
The Sniper [44 words]Wise Jahad AllahDec 5, 2002 18:214441
3John Muhammad is not a righteous muslim [136 words]Born 2x AllahDec 2, 2002 14:534350
Difference between insanity, terrorism, and politics [789 words]WendyNov 27, 2002 12:174288
Don't need to be either to be driven to do such a thing [37 words]DoiNov 15, 2002 00:073934
al Fuqra connections ? [63 words]Arun GuptaNov 10, 2002 18:523764
Re: al Fuqra connection [147 words]Arun GuptaNov 21, 2002 09:343764
fuqra is a facade [52 words]MustafaApr 28, 2003 11:393764
Do American Media Identify with Islamic Terrorists? [46 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Margaret FellNov 10, 2002 15:403761
Meaning of Jihad and Muslim Apologists [131 words]J. K.Nov 8, 2002 14:243728
Mainstream media and Islamists [98 words]John Gould, Jr.Nov 7, 2002 16:103711
Muslims in the Armed Forces [80 words]David MontyNov 6, 2002 07:433680
Cell Self Activation [177 words]Danny BoncaNov 4, 2002 12:083590
Danger Ahead [265 words]TommyNov 3, 2002 22:533571
Where are the "moderate" voices? [45 words]DebbieNov 2, 2002 18:553540
1"I am God", NOI, and the Five Percenters [895 words]DebPNov 1, 2002 09:413470
NOI vs Islam [92 words]AlexJan 23, 2006 10:513470
1Followers of Messenger of Fard VS. Followers of Messenger of Allah [729 words]Muhammad IbrahimAug 6, 2013 03:483470
Victims of Arabian imperialism [96 words]dhimmi no moreAug 13, 2013 07:513470
the five percenters are a cult. [347 words]pierre simmonsApr 5, 2014 12:163470
Don't mix culture or politics with religion [535 words]Amro GaberOct 31, 2002 23:593464
mixing cultures with religion [112 words]john r gaitherJul 25, 2010 18:123464
This time it could be a lone nut [151 words]Howard VeitOct 31, 2002 21:253462
STOP Militant Islam or else! [189 words]RayOct 31, 2002 14:483455
RE:STOP Militant Islam or else! [61 words]AshrafNov 8, 2002 09:063455
Americans' awareness very impressive [195 words]Karsten BraschOct 31, 2002 11:363451
Cogent analysis can't trump Political Correctness [311 words]Gordon BowenOct 31, 2002 10:553450
Don't bother trying to change their view [52 words]KelanaOct 31, 2002 06:173447
Islamic - American confrontation? [47 words]George ValdshteinOct 31, 2002 02:183445
A rather simple explanation [159 words]Curtis BrownOct 31, 2002 00:243443
Muslims in the Armed Forces [87 words]John Kacarab, US Army, RetiredOct 30, 2002 22:303440
Finding the motive for horrible acts [227 words]NabeelOct 30, 2002 22:203439
"Stealing Arab land"? I think not. [436 words]Farhad YazdiOct 30, 2002 15:373433
No right side [577 words]DanielJan 9, 2009 12:143433
Thanks and please continue getting the word out! [160 words]Mike RocheOct 30, 2002 13:293431
Rose-tinted Islamic glasses [141 words]World TravelerOct 30, 2002 12:453430
Financing of Snipers, Motive Assessment [88 words]H. MastersOct 30, 2002 09:023422
Why is Bush So Adamant That Islam is a Religion of Peace? [353 words]Joe LeviOct 30, 2002 07:553421
Another reason... [147 words]Barbara RunkelOct 30, 2002 05:483418
Muslims' value as patriotic citizens [206 words]Steve K.Oct 30, 2002 01:193415
A suggestion for Dr. Pipes' next article [76 words]Richard BurdOct 29, 2002 23:183413
Their own private jihad? [313 words]Joshua TruaxOct 29, 2002 23:103412
The purpose of terror [87 words]Michael TriskaOct 29, 2002 22:053411
Nation of Islam vs. Islam [67 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Gunnar GundersonOct 29, 2002 21:293410
Thank You Standing Up for Truth & Speaking Out for What is Right! [462 words]Lynn RantaOct 29, 2002 20:053409
Psychiatry and Political Killings [56 words]Robert L. Lambright, M.D.Oct 29, 2002 19:013407
Of Course! [47 words]Tom MarrOct 29, 2002 18:383406
Why there is evil in the world [371 words]Deborah HogerOct 29, 2002 18:133404
QUESTION [55 words]NathNov 16, 2007 10:003404
Five Percent Nation of Gods and Earths [168 words]Todd WinteringOct 29, 2002 17:343402
Just building [47 words]RealityApr 24, 2006 20:113402
A common thing in the middle east. [57 words]An IsraeliOct 29, 2002 17:063401
The enemy within. [131 words]RichardZOct 29, 2002 15:403397
Did John Muhammed attack a synagogue? [41 words]Allan UngerOct 29, 2002 15:233396
Where is the visible support from the American Muslim Community? [125 words]Dr. Don SalemOct 29, 2002 15:013395
RE: Where is the visible support from the American Muslim Community? [94 words]AshrafNov 8, 2002 09:563395
Militant Muslims as patriotic citizens? [99 words]David CohenOct 29, 2002 14:393394
Western liberal tolerant mind-set [127 words]LennOct 29, 2002 14:153390
Patriotism vs. "Neutrality" [755 words]m_valparaisoOct 29, 2002 14:013386
There is no such thing as a "Neutral" citizen [94 words]Charles MartelOct 29, 2002 14:093386
Sniper attacked Jewish Synagogue in Seattle [91 words]Pastor Joe FuitenOct 29, 2002 13:473384
Jihad Snipers [188 words]Arlinda M. DeAngelisOct 29, 2002 13:283381
History speaks for itself! [269 words]John ReindersOct 29, 2002 13:143380
Thank you for saying what needs to be said [176 words]mommydocOct 29, 2002 12:223377
Patriotism could be better defined [154 words]George LeeOct 29, 2002 12:103376
Militant Muslims by definition cannot be patriotic [124 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Imran KhanOct 29, 2002 11:583374
"Cell Based Terrorism" [92 words]HawkishOct 29, 2002 11:583373
Thanks for speaking out [58 words]E. DuncanOct 29, 2002 11:403371
Blind eye toward reality [56 words]Victor G. LipshutzOct 29, 2002 11:213370
Muslims as patriotic citizens? [110 words]Nadir AhmedOct 29, 2002 11:023369
Response to Nadir [158 words]AndreOct 29, 2002 13:403369
Responding to Nadir [196 words]Jason RothsteinOct 29, 2002 14:073369
Patriots or Leeches? [96 words]Paul T. SemonesOct 29, 2002 14:163369
Interesting take on events [126 words]JackOct 30, 2002 10:083369
Nadir, read your history [391 words]Lester DentOct 30, 2002 15:513369
Mr. Ahmed, a word please.... [1070 words]David WolfOct 30, 2002 17:133369
Reply to Ahmed [158 words]mikgnuoyniOct 30, 2002 22:353369
Answer to Nadir Ahmed: re your plea for Moral Neutrality [80 words]Harald WaageOct 31, 2002 03:173369
Ahmed's Lies [148 words]Ricardo JimenezOct 31, 2002 08:073369

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)