Submitted by faqi hussain(United States), Dec 14, 2005 at 01:19
"This is a distinct contradiction, please try to understand that these woman transform into suicide-bombers because the international community are ignoring the situation or predicament they are in. Instead of countries like America and Britain, combating terrorism, they should approach the situation at a different angle, instead of resorting to more violence; the international community are just as worse as the terrorists; because of the US and terrorists innocent people are killed -and for what?"
Here we go again, another apologist for Islam. Blame the international community - now we create the suicide bombers? what arrogance, ignorance & hypocrisy?
The US & UK are trying to protect their citizens from terrorist attacks. Mohammedans never accept or acknowledge that they are the problem.
Who attacked whom first? Remember 9/11 and 3,710 further terror attacks by Mohammedans since then, including the 7/7 attack in London, that is why the US & UK took the war to the doorstep of the terrorists. Unfortunately, some innocent civilian casualties have occurred because the spineless terrorists hide amongst civilians and attack the US & UK troops. More Mohammedans are killed by Mohammedans than are killed by the coalition troops.
If there was no insurgency, Iraq and even Afghanistan by now would have been rebuilt and the US & coalition troops would have left. Also, its the elected governments in these 2 countries that do not want the coalition troops to leave.
Why don't the Mohammedans acknowledge that there is something inherently wrong with Islam, You don't see maniacs from other religions running around, blowing up innocent civilians.
You may be a servant of Allah, but there are over 4 billion in the world who do not even acknowledge your Allah or think of him as a benevolent God. ...
Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.