69 million page views

Repetition of U.S. Neocon Propaganda

Reader comment on item: What If the United States Had Not Invaded Iraq

Submitted by Raymond Moore (Republic Of Korea), Sep 17, 2005 at 03:47

This article takes a speculative utilitarian approach to regime change. IMO, it would be more useful to look at the repercussions of that as a U.S. policy. It seems that the Bush administration, in particular, under this misguided policy, rather than employing regime change unilaterally, instead, thinks that it has the right to remove only those brutal dictators who do not "play ball" with the U.S.

Is that a policy which you support?


Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2023 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)