69 million page views


Reader comment on item: What If the United States Had Not Invaded Iraq

Submitted by KI (United States), Sep 12, 2005 at 21:34

I think the Bush administration failed both militarily and politically in Iraq. Saddam Hussein was a ruthless dictator. However, by keeping the Islamists under control, he protected our security. After the invasion, Islamists associated with Ben Laden are operating freely in Iraq. The Iraqis are less secure after the invasion than before it for the same reason. Iraq had a secular government before the invasion. According to its proposed constitution, it may have an Islamist government in the future. This means that the Iraqis will suffer more in the future than pain under the rule of S. Hussein. It seems to me that, thanks to the inaction of the Bush administration in shaping the constitutions of Afghanistan and Iraq, our troops are sacrificing their lives in these countries in order to establish Islamic constitutions and Islamic governments.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2023 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)