69 million page views

What is your point?

Reader comment on item: What If the United States Had Not Invaded Iraq

Submitted by HannahTheStar@aol.com (United States), Sep 11, 2005 at 19:49

Dear Mr. Pipes,

Yes, some things would be different, I get that. But, I don't understand whether you are pro-Bush, or semi-Bush. I agree with you on some levels such as it did have more pros then cons to have the war. I don't agree with you that it succeeded militarily, but not politically, and that's partly because I don't get what you mean. Please ...explain yourself more... Thank you for the article otherwise.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Daniel Pipes replies:

I don't think pro-Bush or anti-Bush is the way to see the issue of Iraq. Rather, it's better to focus on the consequences of American decisions there over the past 2 1/2 years.


Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)