69 million page views

Cognitive dissonance regarding terrorism

Reader comment on item: Terror & Denial [by Hadayat at LAX]

Submitted by John Maloney (United States), Jul 9, 2002 at 16:14

Psychologists have a term for the persistent assertion of an interpretation of reality that is clearly at odds with facts; they call it "cognitive dissonance". We are clearly engaging in cognitive dissonance when we disavow that terrorist acts are being committed against us by individuals who are Muslims, usually of origin in or connection with the Middle East.

It is a futile exercise in appeasement to avoid stating the obvious, and will simply handicap our own effort to achieve security. If there are those who can not differentiate between an attack on terrorism and an attack on Muslims and Islam, our PC statements will be unlikely to teach them the difference.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2023 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)