4 readers online now  |  69 million page views

C'mon folks

Reader comment on item: In 1796, U.S. Vowed Friendliness With Islam
in response to reader comment: Difference between Islam and Radical Islam ?

Submitted by zzazzeefrazzee (United States), Nov 13, 2006 at 11:55

Daniel- great article about Tripoli, although I think many readers readily misconstrue that the behavior of the Barbary states was due to some kind of Jihad against "the west". Political barbarism is more like it.

Daniel has mentioned some Muslims who are struggling against the tide, but few here seem to bother to notice due to some pandemic prejudice. There are many Muslims here at home, the many who do serve our country, including many that currently work for the FBI and CIA, who hate Islamic fundamentalism.

Many prefer to "not engage" some of their neighbors, for the simple fact, they become easy targets for some of my fellow Americans who choose to target them, engender suspicion, and barrage them with criticism of their faith. They serve most importantly as translators. If only 1/10 of the vitriolic spew trashing Muslims collectively was instead diverted to studying the relevant langauages, we might get somewhere. In fact, let's take a minute and thank them for taking a brave stand!!!

Daniel has also mentioned that not all sects and philisophical streams within Islam agree with eth fundmentalist ideology, or poltical islam, and he has rightly highlighted Sufism is a notable mode that has widely stood against the fundamentalists. They are not alone. Many Muslims in the US and the west are just as tired of the banter and rhetoric that spews as Americans love to trash muslims collectively! I think that trashing muslims collectively only serves to help our enemies! think about it. Osama expects you to behave that way, as he wanted to start a religious war, and you fall right into his trap.

Perhaps that is a reason that you will find our president has never been keen on trashing all muslims in the manner that many here openly profess. He is thankful for the support that we get- and desperately need to win the war on terror. Muslims living here are not collectively responsible for prejudice, hatred, and even violence perpetrated by fascist regimes, religious absolutists, and rigid fundamentalists, any more than you, as a Christian, are somehow collectively responsible for the massacre of thousands of Bosnian Muslims by " Christian" Bosnian Serbs in places such as Srebrenica.

If you would like to be effective in your argument, why not do more to hold up those who do take a stand against hate and terror, as a model example? Failure to do that is based solely on arrogance and prejudice. It is possible to illustrate such discussions by demonstrating those who do, and those who don't effectively support us. You could in fact, attempt to lay your preconceived notions aside, for just a moment, and highlight exemplary behavior, though they are not of your faith, if you would only bother.

Sadly very few of my fellow Americans are willing to engage in this as they are reluctant to offer any slight modicum of legitimacy to those practicing another faith, but especially Muslims. It is a very sad, and very glaring failure on the part of many of my fellow Americans. That it is a chosen course of action, the failure to highlight those who a positive example of what you would like to see and expect as model behavior of your fellow Americans indicates how little the region is understood.

I think that many here could actually use Daniel as a model- learn a little language to start! Some Muslims who do get up and speak out, do take a stand against hate, but are either the subject of a barrage harsh and arrogant criticism, deemed "apologists" and worse, "terrorist sympathizers' if they highlight what they feel is a certain role that our foreign policy has played in bringing about such circumstance. In some cases, like our fight against communism in Afghanistan, we failed to clean up the mess, and we saw the fruits of that failure. Criticism is not meant to highlight how awful we are, but to strengthen American resolve to not repeat such mistakes.

Yet many for daring to speak publicly in such a manner engender threats and attacks by my fellow Americans, solely due to certain angry zealots who harbor such a level of sectarian prejudice, they are compelled to engage in such activities. I find many of these individuals incredibly insensitive, callous, and frankly aggressive in many cases towards people who never condoned or supported terror, hate, tyranny, and absolutism in any form. Then a larger segment of my fellow Americans simply react- they dismiss, or pretend not to notice, much less deign to accept, such Muslims who do effectively demonstrate that they are friends of America. Many choose to engage in a type of pietistic discourse regarding Islam, which only stems from sanctimonious arrogance.

My fellow Americans can also choose to highlight, accept, and applaud those Muslims who live in our community that do not endorse such views. You have a certain amount of responsibility for the words you choose to utter, and blaming Muslims collectively only serves to engender more anger and hatred, against those who do not deserve such attention. It certainly offers no real solution to the conflicts at hand. Perhaps you feel it necessary to advance such arguments based upon your own personal religious precepts? You should fully understand the ramifications of such actions, and how they are in fact, very much eagerly anticipated by organizations like Al Qa'ida, should you choose to engage in such rhetoric.

If you tell me that Muslims naturally engender suspicion, when if you bother to look, there are in fact cases where you cannot possibly demonstrate that they support, or give aid to our enemies, then I must conclude that your prejudice is based on fear. If you tell me that they are disinclined to democratic precepts due to the adherence of their faith, this again, is a view that you harbor personally, and rooted in prejudice. You may choose to justify your belief based on your chosen theology, but that is your choice, and is not always shared by many of your fellow Americans who do not choose to engage in, advocate, or participate in your chosen theology.

Hence, I feel most certain that much of the rhetoric about the evils of another religions is not due to any form of objective education about that religion (which is in fact, incredibly diverse, and not managed from any sort of central authority), but simply rooted, very deeply, in nothing more than centuries of sectarian prejudice. Yes, I agree, that Christians are not always treated well in some Muslim countries, and in a horrid and undignified manner in others. Yet when the shoe is on the other foot, what has there been?

For example, did you in fact take a stand during the Balkan War against Serb atrocities against tens of thousands of very innocent Muslims, including men, elders who never raised arms, and small children? Did you take a stand against the collective rape of Bosnian Muslim women by Serb soldiers? Did you attempt to explain how such actions are against Christian precepts, or did you "fall silent" as you now accuse many Muslims of being? Were you silent, because in your view, they are justifiable actions based on events that occurred 500 years earlier? Or do you think it is something to be expected, because you preach the "end times" are at close at hand, and this is merely a "sign of the times"?

If you tell me that the Qur'an doesn't promote religious freedom, well then, let's look closely at the Holy Bible and see if it provides such freedoms as well. Lets take a look at the codes of Justinian and see how institutional Christianity treated those of other faiths. In many cases, it was the same scenario, convert or die. At least that is what some of my Gallic ancestors were subjected to, among others. There are in fact, many Muslims worldwide, who have simply had enough. We have in fact helped to give many a voice. Let's continue to do so. This includes some of your fellow Americans who actively denounce terror, anti-Semitism, and hate.

Sorry, but I think you can do better, as an American, to actually praise those of your fellow Americans who practice a different faith from your own, for taking a very brave stand. Many do this despite alienation from their immediate family members, some mosques (especially when there is only one mosque in a given community, and the leader proves unsympathetic to different views), and even in some cases at the risk of their personal safety. I think they deserve our unequivocal support, loud and clear, not a little bit of lip service, followed by "critique", which only serves to heap insults upon injuries. Such individuals deserve to be applauded, and mentioned, each and every time as a positive exemplar for others to follow.

Let's look at Jordan, Turkey, Bahrayn, Qatar, UAE, and Kuwait, even Malaysia, as many in those countries are pretty sick and tired of the Wahhabis next door in Saudi, and the Islamist IRHABIYEEN that threaten them every day. How many female Kuwaiti royal family members cover their hair? How many Kuwaitis refer to non-Muslims as "dhimmis". Do you find it in their legal code? How many exact a jizya tax on the non-muslims that live in their society? They are far more progressive than some of my fellow Americans will allow themselves to believe. Remember, plenty of Arabs hate Saddam too, and it's not just Muqtada Sadr!

How about the late moderate Shia, Imam Khoeii, who fully supported our efforts, not just to overthrow Saddam, but becuase he really belived in promoting a more moderate form of religion? He was sadly cut down at the start of the Iraq war, simply because we failed to provide proper security after the fall of Baghdad? We let Sadr's thugs get to him, all too quickly, and it's a real shame. I openly mourn his loss, but there are more like him, if you'd care to look about. Not all Muslims hate America and the west! What have you done ot thank such people who take a brave stand? What have you learned about the diversity of beliefs within Islamic Culture? those who have struggled aginst the tide for centuries (at greater personal risk than many here engender)? http://secularislam.org/ www.freemuslims.org www.unionoffaiths.com islamdenouncesantisemitism.com zackvision.com/weblog/islam-and-other-religions irshadmanji.com/ monaeltahawy.com/ m-a-t.org/ mvp-us.org/ www.m-a-t.org/pr-mat-aug16-06 An informative article on the role of Wahhabis in promoting intolerance against other muslims and non-muslims. yes, that;s right, not all Muslims subscribe to this ideology: nationalreview.com/interrogatory/interrogatory111802-dot-a-s-p While I don't agree with all these views, I will support them for confronting the terrorist ideology. You may have to learn a little more about Islam and even a bit of Arabic to fully understand this! virtualreligio.net/vri/islam3.html wheeloftheyear-dot-com/2006/sufimuslim.htm sufistic-dot-red-sulphur.org zaytuna-dot-org/index.asp israinternational.com/ muhajabah.com/otherscondemn.php windsofchange.net/archives/cat_features_sufi_wisdom.php

Next, there are Muslims who are very critical of groups like CAIR who endlessly easily offended. http://www.philly.com/mld/inquirer/news/editorial/15401769.htm then there are some groups abroad that should be noted and supported. Here is one in Egypt, called "Kifaya" or "Enough". Images of a recent demonstration by women in Cairo against sexual assualt: http://www.harakamasria.org/node/8374 Rang-a-Rang in Virginia provides a lot of Persian language programming that is hardly endorsing the regime in Iran, if anything, it's regime-change! Rangaragtv-dot-com If you don't know Farsi, then learn some!! www.easypersian.com

Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Submit a comment on this item

<< Previous Comment      Next Comment >>

Reader comments (156) on this item

Title Commenter Date Thread
13it does not matter that America is not at war with islam, ...islam is at war with America, Canada, Scotland, and the whole world. [93 words]Phil GreendAug 29, 2010 10:34177422
2Injust. [112 words]Mehmet KelesSep 18, 2011 16:09177422
2urgent communication on ISLAM AND FRAUD [523 words]MARJan 27, 2009 12:39149234
RE How Many ? [22 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
A JDec 27, 2008 02:57145970
Very Logical Explaination [27 words]ManishOct 16, 2009 17:26145970
I am Not Aware that This Writing...about such a Law, was part of the Administration of President Washington or, [1136 words]Hazel DavisSep 9, 2008 11:28138182
Neo-conservatism [104 words]Octavio JohansonNov 16, 2006 05:1366293
1America has no choice but to defend European Civilization--but first it must stop bickering and focus on the enemy [1401 words]Ed HubbardNov 15, 2006 12:3166198
Relevance of the Barbary Wars in the early 19th Century [934 words]Jascha KesslerNov 14, 2006 15:1066100
4The First Barbary Wars, Terrorism in Early American and the Similarities of the War on Terror between "Then" and "Now" [6257 words]Suzanne SahlMar 20, 2007 14:1166100
How about present America's Sovereignty? [226 words]H. D. SchmidtSep 13, 2009 18:4866100
What about American Aggression? [184 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Bader SNov 11, 2006 05:1465801
Re: Dr Pipes's response [48 words]Bader SNov 14, 2006 03:5065801
response to.....'there is little purpose arguing over such matters." [604 words]dave vietsNov 15, 2006 13:5265801
Clarification please. What is Islam and what is radical Islam? [276 words]MelMNov 10, 2006 23:5865791
7Difference between Islam and Radical Islam ? [232 words]KandaraNov 11, 2006 20:3365791
Islami is Islam [217 words]Domenic PepeNov 11, 2006 22:4065791
Much of what you describe is indicative of radical Islam.. [198 words]J.S.Nov 12, 2006 18:0665791
C'mon folks [1889 words]zzazzeefrazzeeNov 13, 2006 11:5565791
Response to Kandara [108 words]Judeo-ChristNov 13, 2006 13:4665791
1Thanks J.S. But the "Islam and radical Islam" distinction makes by head hurt. [258 words]MelMNov 14, 2006 00:4765791
Recent terrorist videos: [245 words]E.J. SHAFERApr 25, 2007 02:5065791
Time for a change? Or "How to re-assess who's an 'ally' of the U.S." [219 words]J.S.Nov 10, 2006 13:0465758
America is a strange country [87 words]f.shakkiNov 10, 2006 13:0365757
Prof. Pipes should contest for President by Republican Party in next elections [33 words]HajaribhaiNov 10, 2006 19:1265757
the new Swiss [134 words]Donald ONov 10, 2006 20:3865757
Hot News from Holland! [109 words]Octavio JohansonNov 11, 2006 09:1165757
A no brainer [124 words]dfwhiteNov 11, 2006 15:3465757
Response to; America is a strange country [122 words]Judeo-ChristNov 12, 2006 17:0565757
Naive? [224 words]ashmaroNov 13, 2006 14:0265757
1The day will come!!! [190 words]dfwhiteNov 13, 2006 16:0065757
The ignorance of Americans vis a vis Islam [209 words]Stephen PhillipsMar 1, 2007 18:5165757
The sleeping giant shall not rise from this nap. It's the last one. [121 words]Stephen PhillipsMar 1, 2007 19:0865757
no re-action after 9-11 [71 words]Phil GreendMay 18, 2007 12:1965757
1The treaty With Tripoli [130 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Richard B. ParkerNov 10, 2006 12:5765756
interesting book [50 words]cvtOct 24, 2007 11:4965756
This is no buttering up! just a moment of truth. [148 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
HarrakNov 9, 2006 23:2365703
Harrak, Pipes' contradiction [135 words]InfidelNov 14, 2006 14:3365703
The logician and the magician [244 words]HarrakNov 14, 2006 21:4765703
US "Friendliness with Islam?" [223 words]Maurice PicowNov 9, 2006 16:2865682
Maurice Picow, Slavers were Muslims [44 words]InfidelNov 10, 2006 19:5965682
An intellectual hit-man at work. [149 words]MelMNov 10, 2006 21:5365682
Slavers were Muslims [115 words]Maurice PicowNov 24, 2006 08:3365682
Washington's Religious Outlook Towards The Islamic Faiths A Model For Others [132 words]Philip W. ChapmanNov 9, 2006 15:3065674
it's simple really [28 words]edNov 9, 2006 23:0965674
Re: Washington's Religious Outlook [81 words]Octavio JohansonNov 10, 2006 03:4665674
Octavio firing Katyushas from his glass house.. [95 words]HarrakNov 11, 2006 00:4865674
I agree with Harrak [317 words]Octavio JohansonNov 12, 2006 14:4365674
The bulk of the problem [75 words]Octavio JohansonNov 12, 2006 16:1965674
" Do you still want to fire a missile at my glass house? " No, as I did not say I want to.. [199 words]HarrakNov 12, 2006 21:4765674
I agree with Octavio [136 words]Judeo-ChristNov 13, 2006 02:0465674
Each to their own [37 words]Octavio JohansonNov 13, 2006 17:5865674
Harrak makes a good point, at last [55 words]Octavio JohansonNov 18, 2006 04:3665674
Islam and the Islamic Clergy Are the Enemy [195 words]Domenic PepeNov 9, 2006 01:4465626
Another interpretation [87 words]Joel StromNov 9, 2006 01:1765622
Tripoli Treaty [2085 words]Paul RinderleNov 8, 2006 19:2565597
Treaty of Tripoli does not support a secular America [31 words]BillJun 19, 2009 19:5965597
radical islam existed also in 1796 [153 words]Martien.PenningsNov 8, 2006 18:3065593
Why 2006 is a different story [223 words]Octavio JohansonNov 9, 2006 16:3965593
To Martien.Pennings [21 words]Gellin and InfidellinNov 10, 2006 09:2365593
Question for Daniel Pipes? [281 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Ron ThompsonNov 8, 2006 17:5065590
The United States, 210 years on [149 words]Octavio JohansonNov 8, 2006 14:0265567
Innocent White British Teenager murdered by Pakistani Muslims in United Kingdom [30 words]markNov 9, 2006 12:5665567
Majority of Terrorist attacks have roots in Pakistani Islamic Seminaries [269 words]AlexanderNov 9, 2006 22:2565567
Whens it going to stop!!! [65 words]dfwhiteNov 11, 2006 15:5665567
Barlow's 11th.article declaring "friendliness with Islam" [3585 words]Barry HolroydNov 8, 2006 11:4965555
What Islam Really Wants [58 words]Mike RamirezNov 8, 2006 10:5665552
America understood the threat from Jihad terrorism in the 1800's [73 words]PhilipNov 8, 2006 10:3365549
Radical Islam did not exist in 1796 [194 words]Alfred H. YoliNov 8, 2006 10:0765546
voa [26 words]cyrusNov 8, 2006 05:1965528
Nothing Has Changed [488 words]Caesar ArevaloNov 8, 2006 02:2465518
Same old game [61 words]David SabghirNov 8, 2006 00:4765510
The war waged by the Muslims is a war on the Infidels [3444 words]ahmadnagar3Nov 7, 2006 21:2965499
Ahmadnagar3, Islam and War are brothers [93 words]InfidelNov 9, 2006 13:3965499
The bible prophesied this thousands of years ago... [91 words]JitterboogieNov 10, 2006 10:5465499
Fool's Paradise! [100 words]Ammar AhmedNov 7, 2006 21:2065498
1Reply to Fools Paradise [50 words]Judeo-ChristNov 8, 2006 23:3165498
Substantiate......! [74 words]AmmarNov 9, 2006 20:1765498
Totalitarian ideology DID exist before 1796! [397 words]Martin HendersonNov 7, 2006 21:1565497
the tides of change [148 words]trans-parereNov 7, 2006 19:5765492
In 1796, U.S. Vowed Friendliness With Islam [135 words]Amin kobeissyNov 7, 2006 18:2265485
For Amin and Arabian imperialism and the religion of the Arabs [292 words]dhimmi no moreNov 19, 2006 15:5865485
Jefferson and Islam 1804 pertaining to this treaty [145 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Jesse CollinsNov 7, 2006 18:1165484
Who in Islam recognized this treaty? [230 words]PatNov 7, 2006 17:5065480
End the "Stay and Pray" strategy in Iraq and end "harmonious relations" with jihadis [113 words]MelMNov 7, 2006 17:0065473
We need to start a full scale & all out Global War against Islamists and their supporters [495 words]NalwaNov 8, 2006 06:1465473
Why you are confusing people with words like Islamism , Radical Islam , Militant Islam , Wahabi Islam , Jihadi Islam ?? [83 words]GaluNov 18, 2006 06:3965473
2Appeasement of Islam [481 words]Prof. Paul EidelbergNov 7, 2006 16:5365472
Prof. Paul Eidelberg [98 words]HarrakNov 7, 2006 17:4865472
Confusion is the right word [100 words]PatNov 7, 2006 18:0565472
64How Many Muslims Are Terrorists? [2086 words]Prof. SharmaNov 8, 2006 06:3265472
Appeasement of islam [229 words]sgiNov 8, 2006 13:1865472
To Prof Eidelberg.. [261 words]J.S.Nov 8, 2006 17:3565472
Reciprocity -- Addition to Prof. Eidelberg's comments [70 words]Eliyahu ben AbrahamNov 9, 2006 06:4565472
to Pat the stance of an islamic sect has no relevance [37 words]Gellin and InfidellinNov 10, 2006 09:4065472
10% [133 words]dfwhiteNov 11, 2006 16:1565472
Denying the opportunity for violent jihad [360 words]PatNov 12, 2006 12:2465472
Harrak has got a split personality [57 words]Octavio JohansonNov 13, 2006 11:0965472
Split personality! that is called bi-curiousity.. [138 words]HarrakNov 15, 2006 14:5265472
Mr. Harrak, what are your views? [57 words]Octavio JohansonNov 16, 2006 19:0765472
Terrorism is the most overhyped story in the history of the mass media. [47 words]SGOct 21, 2007 16:0365472
RESPONSE TO DR SHARMA [240 words]TimJan 8, 2008 11:3965472
how many muslims are terrorist = how many people will get hit by a DWI [328 words]NaziaOct 7, 2008 12:0565472
Fact [14 words]TYJan 8, 2009 16:2465472
Counterproductive? I think not. [370 words]John OFeb 25, 2009 08:0765472
1nonsense [43 words]jayMay 18, 2009 18:0065472
Muslim Terrorists? How many? [43 words]Hemingway WilbaOct 8, 2009 10:2565472
99.96% Terrorism originated from non-Muslims! [12 words]Faruque AhmedJun 30, 2010 12:1065472
Thanks [59 words]Tom MartinDec 12, 2010 13:5465472
TERRORISTS [63 words]hazemDec 24, 2010 23:2565472
Jihad? [117 words]JOEDec 26, 2010 01:5365472
This is messed up [41 words]AnonymousJan 26, 2011 19:0965472
Conspiracy theory [21 words]joFeb 1, 2011 20:0765472
WHAT? [5 words]AhmetMar 8, 2011 23:4565472
No comments [9 words]Ravi Ranjan Singh Bharat PanthiMar 12, 2011 22:1765472
The Truth [9 words]James WaltersOct 4, 2011 21:0165472
Informative [13 words]Louis MathewsApr 24, 2013 00:0365472
I don't think so [28 words]SamAug 12, 2013 15:1665472
That Turkish guy you say is fundamentalist.. forbid women to wear headscarf [38 words]BruteDec 16, 2014 07:5765472
only one thing I noticed. [61 words]Ross HillJan 13, 2015 21:2065472
you are totally wrong [48 words]Fawad janFeb 24, 2015 11:0465472
long history of Islam's antipathy to the West [170 words]Shepard BarbashNov 7, 2006 15:3365471
Peace with them, but they are at war with us [140 words]David W. LincolnNov 7, 2006 15:1465469
In 1796, U.S. Vowed Friendliness with Islam [147 words]kim segarNov 7, 2006 14:2665466
Keeping the Faith [29 words]Judeo-ChristNov 7, 2006 19:3665466
Read the reality of Islam , Koran , Prophet Mohamad , Hadis and Sharia ............ [150 words]KuffarNov 8, 2006 06:2865466
To Kuffar enlightened one!~ [5 words]Gellin and InfidellinNov 10, 2006 09:4465466
2Real Purpose of the Treaty [112 words]Sam PyeatteNov 7, 2006 13:3965463
Treaties aren't "signed into law" [49 words]A. S. KraditorNov 7, 2006 13:3765462
Mobilization of public opinion in Arab countries [88 words]VijayNov 7, 2006 13:3665461
Vijay, the earth belongs to Muslims [143 words]InfidelNov 7, 2006 23:2165461
Travesty in translation [70 words]Lowell BogartNov 7, 2006 12:3965460
America's intentions [300 words]SafrazNov 7, 2006 12:1865458
Bad comparison [578 words]Lewis LoflinNov 8, 2006 03:0065458
1How about Muslim intentions? [433 words]PatNov 8, 2006 11:4465458
post-war Japan and Germany compared to Iraq ... [33 words]Mike the infidelNov 8, 2006 14:4965458
Safraz [298 words]DaisyNov 9, 2006 19:2965458
37Islamic Tactics of Taqqiya teaches Muslims to practise Deception , Fraud & Double Standards to spread Islam [308 words]BouraNov 9, 2006 22:1165458
Simple reason both Japan and Germany were not Islamic country [150 words]RahuNov 10, 2006 11:3565458
1Taqqiya [92 words]DerekFeb 14, 2009 12:5565458
1EVIL [74 words]Buck CrosbyAug 27, 2010 16:3365458
taqqiya [68 words]aliJul 31, 2011 09:1665458
In 1796, there was no Israel [22 words]HarrakNov 7, 2006 11:5265457
A very good year. No Iran, no Iraq, limited Muslim immigration to Europe & The U.S for handouts [83 words]Sword of Islam & The Babies of BeslanNov 7, 2006 17:2065457
Wrong, again and again [114 words]Yuval Brandstetter MDNov 8, 2006 07:3965457
2With friends like the moslem states, who needs enemies? [68 words]joe kaffirNov 8, 2006 10:2565457
3Israel was there , Israel is there and will be there forever [286 words]Indian HinduNov 9, 2006 06:1165457
There was no Palestine [19 words]surjOct 26, 2007 21:1365457
Re: Re: Comment on In 1796, U.S. Vowed Friendliness With Islam [107 words]HarrakOct 28, 2007 11:0565457
Don't behave as Hindu [2089 words]Ravi Ranjan Singh Bharat PanthiMar 11, 2011 03:0565457
The Masonic Connection.... [124 words]DONVANNov 7, 2006 11:1265453
Offers of Financial Aid [191 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Fredric FastowNov 7, 2006 10:4765452
1......Fool us twice, shame on us. [72 words]JaladhiNov 7, 2006 10:2465451
1Muslim Doctors caught for planning Islamic Terror activities [511 words]RakeshNov 9, 2006 13:0965451
Hindi terrorism. [87 words]Ronald RodrixNov 13, 2008 04:0065451
Why only Hindu Army to be singled out [21 words]Ravi Ranjan Singh Bharat PanthiMar 12, 2011 22:1365451

Comment on this item

Mark my comment as a response to C'mon folks by zzazzeefrazzee

Email me if someone replies to my comment

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

See recent outstanding comments.

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

ADVERTISEMENTS

eXTReMe Tracker

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2019 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)