1 readers online now  |  69 million page views
You're invited: Join Daniel Pipes & MEF on a fact-finding mission
to Poland, Hungary & Austria. For more information, click here

SHARIA IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL

Reader comment on item: What's Trump's Policy on Visas for Muslims?
in response to reader comment: muslim or islamist?

Submitted by UNCLE VLADDI (Canada), Aug 18, 2016 at 17:44

Muslims DON'T share Western values at all – quite the opposite!

Islamic sharia "law" (crime) is the EXACT OPPOSITE of Western LAW.

Our LAW is based on the Golden Rule, which most simply defines all circumstantial, situational morality as

"Do Not Attack First."

So all is forbidden, unless and until very specifically agreed to.

This means our only real right is to not be attacked first, and our only real responsibility is to not attack (thereby innocent) others first.

Period.

It also therefore means we aren't allowed to do anything either TO, or FOR each other, without getting the others' express assent first.

And it applies at all levels of human social interaction, from the individual, family, clan, tribe, nation, state, empire and global (international) levels.

It's why even the largest group or gang of individual humans, "the state" isn't allowed to attack any of its real live human individual citizen component parts first, and so it's why we have an expectation of "Innocent Until Proven Guilty," and not – as criminal libertine "liberal" gangsters always seem to prefer, the exact opposite, or "Guilty Until Never Proven Innocent!"

From this social contract, the West establishes trust, and through that trust, economic progress, and Civilization.

Islam, being based on the exact opposite, where all is allowed except and until that which is very specifically disallowed, asserts it's always everyone's holy right and duty to attack everyone else first, to do whatever they can (might makes right!) TO others, as long as they can claim to be doing it FOR them (for their own good)!

From embracing this brazen rule of criminal chaos, they inflict distrust, economic stagnation, and savage barbarism on everyone.

CAPISCE?

;-)

Further, Islam is inherently a form of SEDITION - because it never agreed with the Christian notion of separating secular (road-paving, taxation) and religious realms (render unto Caesar) and went with "Render The World Unto Muhammad!"

So it doesn't believe in national sovereignty, preferring global theocracy ('ummah') ruled by the Caliphate government!

Islam is ONLY a crime syndicate, and the only "religious" part in it's where they say:

"God told us to commit these crimes!"

Muslims are never national citizens; they regard all national sovereignties as temporary, man-made false idols which must all be eventually destroyed and replaced with the one-world global muslim Ummah, to be ruled by their theocratic caliphate, and their duty is to wage offensive war to extort, enslave, and murder all the non-muslims.

Terrorism is an inherent, not an incidental, nor in any way a "radical," component of islam.

NO MUSLIMS ARE "PATRIOTS" OR NATIONALISTS OF ANY KIND!

No self-determined muslim believes in any sovereign national governments nor countries at all, ever!

Sharia is allegedly the perfect law of allah, based directly on the Qur'an!

So it always applies to all humans everywhere!

SO WHO NEEDS ANY – EVEN "ELECTED" – MAN-MADE GOVERNMENTS TO CREATE LAWS WHICH DIFFER FROM SHARIA?!

Recall the Ayatollah Khomeini's words during his 1980 speech in Qom, the Shi'ite spiritual hub:

"We do not worship Iran, we worship Allah. For patriotism is another name for paganism. I say let this land burn. I say let this land [Iran] go up in smoke, provided Islam emerges triumphant in the rest of the world."

So, since islam is a subversive anti-national and anti-legal entity, why on earth are any of its "muslim" members ever afforded any legal standing to promote their criminal treasonous sedition, before any of our courts of law?!

Shariah Law vs. the Constitution:

Article VI: The Constitution is the supreme law of the land

 Constitution: Article VI: "This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall
be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the
Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every
State shall be bound thereby"

 Shariah: "The source of legal rulings for all acts of those who are morally responsible is
Allah." (a1.1, Umdat al-salik or The Reliance of the Traveller, commonly accepted work of
Shariah jurisprudence); "There is only one law which ought to be followed, and that is the
Sharia." (Seyed Qutb); "Islam wishes to destroy all states and governments anywhere on the
face of the earth which are opposed to the ideology and program of Islam regardless of the
country or the nation which rules it. The purpose of Islam is to set up a State on the basis of
its own ideology and program." (Seyed Abul A'ala Maududi)

First Amendment: Freedom of religion

 Constitution: First Amendment: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of
religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof "

 Shariah: "Those who reject Islam must be killed. If they turn back (from Islam), take hold of
them and kill them wherever you find them." Quran 4:89 ; "Whoever changed his [Islamic]
religion, then kill him" Sahih al-Bukhari, 9:84:57. In historic and modern Shariah states,
Shariah law enforces dhimmi status (second-class citizen, apartheid-type laws) on non-
Muslims, prohibiting them from observing their religious practices publicly, building or
repairing churches, raising their voices during prayer or ringing church bells; if dhimmi laws
are violated in the Shariah State, penalties are those used for prisoners of war: death, slavery,
release or ransom.(o9.14, o11.0-o11.11, Umdat al-salik).

First Amendment: Freedom of speech

 Constitution: First Amendment: Congress shall not abridge "the freedom of speech."

 Shariah: Speech defaming Islam or Muhammad is considered "blasphemy" and is punishable
by death or imprisonment.

First Amendment: Freedom to dissent

 Constitution: First Amendment: "Congress cannot take away the right of the people "to
petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

 Shariah: Non-Muslims are not to harbor any hostility toward the Islamic state or give
comfort to those who disagree with Islamic government.

Second Amendment: Right to self-defense

 Constitution: Second Amendment: "The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not
be infringed."

 Shariah: Under historic and modern dhimmi laws, non-Muslims cannot possess swords,
firearms or weapons of any kind.

Fifth, Sixth and Seventh Amendments: Right to due process and fair trial

 Constitution: Fifth Amendment: "no person shall be held to answer for a capital or otherwise
infamous crime... without due process of law." Sixth Amendment: guarantees a "public trial
by an impartial jury." Seventh Amendment: "the right of trial by jury shall be preserved."

 Shariah: Hadith Sahih al-Bukhari: Muhammad said, "No Muslim should be killed for killing
a Kafir (infidel)." Non-Muslims are prohibited from testifying against Muslims. A woman's
testimony is equal to half of a man's.

Eighth Amendment: No cruel and unusual punishment

 Constitution: Eighth Amendment: "nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted."

 Shariah: Under Shariah punishments are barbaric: "Cut off the hands of thieves, whether they
are male or female, as punishment for what they have done – a deterrent from Allah." Quran
5:38; A raped woman is punished:"The woman and the man guilty of adultery or fornication –
flog each of them with a hundred stripes" (Sura 24:2).

Fourteenth Amendment: Right to equal protection and due process

 Constitution: Fourteenth Amendment: "No State shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State
deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any
person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. "

 Shariah: Under dhimmi laws enforced in modern Shariah states, Jews, Christians and other
non-Muslims are not equal to Muslims before the law. Under Shariah law, women, girls,
apostates, homosexuals and "blasphemers" are all denied equality under the law.

BOTTOM LINE:

Islam's Sharia is either compatible with our Western, morality-based law (in which case it is superfluous) or it is not (in which case it is illegal).

There is only one universally accepted version of sharia crime ('law') and that is the original, Haneefite version as recorded in The Hedaya and used by the Ottoman Empire to rule all of islam for centuries; all moslems in all their countries are very aware of its simple might-makes-right and us-versus-them tenets and strictures.

There is really only one Qur'an, one islam, and one sharia.

So, since islam is a subversive anti-national and anti-legal entity, why on earth are any of its "muslim" members ever afforded any legal standing to promote their criminal treasonous sedition, before any of our courts of law?!

Allowing foreign (sharia "law") courts to exist in your country is to enable those foreign governments to govern in your country; it's obviously TREASON.


Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Submitting....

Submit a comment on this item

Reader comments (75) on this item

Title Commenter Date Thread
2Gun violence vs pressure cooker violence [221 words]PrashantSep 18, 2016 02:20232807
Trump locks door on usa entries. [32 words]Sandra BesirovicSep 11, 2016 16:49232546
2Muslim Ban. [51 words]AlbertE.Aug 22, 2016 12:48231598
guess who [12 words]Mohammed Waza Khiddif id'UllahSep 10, 2016 06:35231598
"Worried About American Politics?" [242 words]M ToveyAug 19, 2016 14:57231511
1Antichrist, elected in 2020? [366 words]Michael SAug 20, 2016 03:24231511
New Military confrontation between US and Russia in Syria. We may be in deep doo-doo [382 words]Michael SAug 21, 2016 01:43231511
Valley of Jezreel Over View [158 words]M ToveyAug 23, 2016 16:28231511
1The Iminent End of the World as we Know it. [996 words]Michael SAug 25, 2016 05:04231511
Bingo [31 words]Simon NéhméAug 31, 2016 04:35231511
As Syrian Sand Trap Gets Deeper: Certain Influences Looking for Plausible Deniability? [247 words]M ToveyOct 4, 2016 15:45231511
Predictions concerning the upcoming US Presidents [1219 words]Michael SOct 6, 2016 11:21231511
Turkey is making military and political moves into Syria and Iraq [162 words]Michael SOct 24, 2016 01:56231511
All Part of the Larger Scheme of Things - Chess Moves Vs Checkers [193 words]M ToveyOct 26, 2016 11:38231511
Latest on Russia Strategic Goals: Worldwide Nuclear Exchange [211 words]Michael SOct 26, 2016 15:25231511
Russia, Turkey and Iran. [113 words]Michael S.Nov 1, 2016 00:04231511
Strategic Goals Notwithstanding - Russia Does not Intend to Remain Second. [74 words]M ToveyNov 1, 2016 13:36231511
6Trump raised the right issue and he gets my vote for this reason [212 words]PrashantAug 19, 2016 01:53231500
2the ability to learn... [82 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
ktchnsnkAug 18, 2016 17:58231493
Any one more capable of winning than Trump would have been same-old-same-old [82 words]PrashantAug 20, 2016 16:01231493
... The fate of the Jews is with Israel; American politics cannot save them. [342 words]Michael SAug 25, 2016 21:07231493
Ban all immigration for a generation. [108 words]donAug 18, 2016 14:22231488
Islamist or not? Where Does the Burden of Proof Lie? [109 words]Stu FaginAug 18, 2016 10:26231480
We should reward freedom and democracy [176 words]PrashantAug 21, 2016 00:34231480
massive not marginal [151 words]mythAug 18, 2016 05:33231473
CORRECTION TO MY PREVIOUS POST. Astrology, history, and the times we live in. [519 words]Michael SAug 17, 2016 23:24231470
5Trump's Hypocrisy [138 words]DajjalAug 17, 2016 20:43231467
1actually I think the 'R' word aptly describes today's jihadists [70 words]OliverAug 18, 2016 09:57231467
2Muslims, as a group, do not fit into Western society. Also, It's Not Trump's Fault; and Welcome to Laputa [676 words]Michael SAug 18, 2016 20:22231467
2Definition of radical [79 words]DajjalAug 20, 2016 04:47231467
1Confession of Partial Assent & Partial Dissent [191 words]DajjalAug 20, 2016 05:06231467
Election Odds [185 words]Michael SAug 23, 2016 10:50231467
3Trump Battles False Anti-Racism [229 words]DaveAug 17, 2016 19:00231466
9ALL MUSLIMS CALL THEM SELVES "MUSLIMS," NOT "ISLAMISTS" [335 words]UNCLE VLADDIAug 17, 2016 18:28231465
2wow so many hitting the jihadist nail on the head [70 words]OliverAug 18, 2016 10:30231465
2really [4 words]Milady KafirAug 18, 2016 16:43231465
3"Radical" has been misused to death [127 words]UNCLE VLADDIAug 20, 2016 18:11231465
2Go Ahead. Help Benghazi win. It may even have been prophesied. [1114 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Michael SAug 17, 2016 18:10231464
Family Camp, Smelly Dripping Fish-People, and Turkish Nukes [487 words]Michael SAug 18, 2016 16:58231464
2Nukes "safely" removed to Romania?! [24 words]UNCLE VLADDIAug 20, 2016 18:17231464
Nukes [135 words]AlbertE.Aug 22, 2016 12:52231464
1We've been praying a lot [206 words]Michael SAug 23, 2016 09:44231464
Turkey-Iran-Russia Axis most dangerous to Israel since 1948 [90 words]Michael SAug 23, 2016 09:55231464
2THE BEST NUCLEAR OPTION...! [215 words]UNCLE VLADDIAug 24, 2016 17:20231464
1Igor speaks, master! [447 words]Michael SAug 26, 2016 07:26231464
"everything is a suggestion" [84 words]OliverAug 17, 2016 16:51231463
2Pragmatism [91 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Wallace SchwamAug 17, 2016 15:25231462
2Difficult Task [159 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
JoeAug 17, 2016 15:06231461
1Where does Trump Stand. [78 words]SteveAug 17, 2016 14:39231460
1the problem IS [79 words]OliverAug 18, 2016 11:14231460
Trump [11 words]SteveAug 21, 2016 12:29231460
Trump's immigration policy is a step in the 'right' direction [78 words]OliverAug 23, 2016 09:49231460
Hi There [36 words]SteveAug 24, 2016 22:45231460
1The problem with vetting. [200 words]Michael SAug 25, 2016 21:33231460
I AGREE to a degree [195 words]OliverAug 26, 2016 10:07231460
1Americans need empathy, more than empty-headed "solutions" [629 words]Michael SAug 31, 2016 07:38231460
2muslim or islamist? [24 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
dianne gallenAug 17, 2016 10:36231459
should Sharia 'judges' be able to apply prescribed punishments for Muslims who do not follow Sharia Law? [55 words]OliverAug 18, 2016 11:34231459
5SHARIA IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL [1437 words]UNCLE VLADDIAug 18, 2016 17:44231459
Sorry [11 words]Steve HAug 19, 2016 22:38231459
2Why: Ignorance & Tradition [141 words]DajjalSep 17, 2016 20:14231459
2SUICIDAL MASOCHISM IS HYPOCRISY [86 words]UNCLE VLADDISep 18, 2016 21:02231459
1Gotcha, Unk! [72 words]DajjalOct 30, 2016 18:08231459
Muslim Immigration [22 words]Iftikhar AhmadAug 17, 2016 10:25231458
1you seem to have the ox before the cart [28 words]OliverAug 18, 2016 11:53231458
1dearth of evidence in its favor [236 words]Mohammed Waza Khiddif id'UllahSep 10, 2016 06:34231458
Pipe's policy more draconian than Trump's earlier policy [107 words]BillAug 17, 2016 10:09231457
7Trump's policies on Visas. So what shall be the solution to HIllary adding more refugees? [266 words]Anne-USAAug 17, 2016 09:08231455
3Trump may be open to many of your ideas [440 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
JonathanAug 17, 2016 08:08231454
1Looking forward to an article on Hillary vs Trump [580 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
JonathanAug 18, 2016 11:34231454
Very well said Jonathan [30 words]PrashantAug 21, 2016 00:23231454
2vetting a candidate [53 words]simonAug 17, 2016 07:15231450
2Trump is a businessman [64 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Alana RonaldAug 17, 2016 03:29231448
3Islamists or Muslims: Same Goal [347 words]Mike RamirezAug 17, 2016 00:41231447
3partial agree and partial disagree [76 words]Vincent ScopaAug 17, 2016 00:32231446

Comment on this item

Mark my comment as a response to SHARIA IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL by UNCLE VLADDI

Email me if someone replies to my comment

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

See recent outstanding comments.

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

ADVERTISEMENTS

eXTReMe Tracker

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2018 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)