Daniel Pipes
Mobile Edition
Regular Site

Regarding Judaism and Christianity being defective variants of Islam
Reader comment on item: Islam and Islamism - Faith and Ideology

Submitted by Ihsan Ayyub Qazi (Pakistan), Feb 11, 2005 at 06:28

Assalam o Alaikum [Peace be on You],

According to my understanding of Islam, Judaism and Christianity are not defective variants of Islam. The literal meaning of the word Muslim is one who submits his will to God, hence the Holy Quran refers to the Prophets as muslims including Prophet Abrahan, Prophet Moses, Prophet Jesus and others. The Jews [who were muslims i.e. submitted their will to God] were given a special position and many Prophets of God were sent to their nation. When they continued to disobey the commandments given by God [the details can be read from Bible and from the Quran especially in the early portion of Surah Baqarah], there special position was taken back. So I don't think it is appropriate to term Judaism as a defective variant of Islam. It would be more approriate to say that all these religions follow the same basic tradition. As far as Chritianity is concerned, the Quran hold the view that they went astray. They believed Prophet Jesus to be God's only begotten son and hence also God. This is sharply contrasting to the views held Islam and Judaism who are very strict about attributed of God. It is mentioned in the Quran that God is one, He is Absolute and Eternal, He begets not nor is He begotten and there is none unto like Him. Exactly similar is the point of view held by the Jews. It is also quite surprising that there isn'y a single unequivocal statement in the Bible in which Prophet Jesus said worship me and I am God. So these are the differences. As far as the hertigae is concerned the Jews and Christians are our cousins. And we hope to engage with them in dialogue because we share the same goal --> that is to find the truth.

Ihsan

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

Submit a comment on this item

Search by Enter name or date
Search Forum Comments:

Reader comments (21) on this item

Title By Date
Questions for Prof.Pipes
[w/response] [53 words]
infosifterMar 23, 2008 12:30
Thanks to Prof. Pipes [24 words]infosifterMar 24, 2008 17:14
Pain, support and apathy [78 words]Phil GreendJan 10, 2008 16:05
small note ( detail ) [89 words]catholicJul 19, 2007 20:07
Mathew 11:1-16 [217 words]André MarcNov 14, 2007 22:26
Stop whitewashing [87 words]Shabana MuhammadJan 7, 2007 00:19
Ignorance is bliss [12 words]PDMJan 5, 2007 12:47
Dangerous Dissection [237 words]Shivkumar SinghFeb 14, 2006 17:39
Nothing can convince me about Islam [42 words]MartinJul 13, 2007 02:12
Re: Nothing can convince me about Islam [114 words]Farhan AhmedJun 1, 2008 01:53
Stop whitewashing Islam [13 words]scrutatorAug 5, 2008 12:56
Appeasement [102 words]BryanDec 2, 2008 12:29
verification [14 words]lilyJan 31, 2009 07:51
Re: An interesting ...dissection [136 words]Reuben HorneAug 22, 2005 22:10
Islam and Islamism - Faith and Ideology [32 words]Karel Orlík,Jul 2, 2005 05:17
⇒ Regarding Judaism and Christianity being defective variants of Islam [303 words]Ihsan Ayyub QaziFeb 11, 2005 06:28
GOD AND ALLAH [1051 words]Jennifer KingJan 17, 2006 07:35
Endless useless argument [92 words]Liz ReynoldsFeb 15, 2006 15:44
Separation of Church and State [195 words]Michael KermonNov 22, 2007 10:20
God's Holiness cannot be matched by the most sincere efforts of man [252 words]William EastMay 18, 2008 16:41
church and state [571 words]truthseekersNov 20, 2008 09:49

Comment on this item

Name
Email Address (optional)
Title of Comments
Comments:

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

See the 25 most recent outstanding comments.

Back to top of page