Daniel Pipes
Mobile Edition
Regular Site

God's Holiness cannot be matched by the most sincere efforts of man
Reader comment on item: Islam and Islamism - Faith and Ideology
in response to reader comment: Regarding Judaism and Christianity being defective variants of Islam

Submitted by William East (United States), May 18, 2008 at 16:41

Eternal God, all-knowing and all-powerful God, protects his immaculate Purity, his attribute of Holiness, his Righteousness, with his attribute of Justice. God's Righteousness cannot be matched by human effort and yet islam teaches that 'righteous' deeds will be balanced against other deeds by God at a future time of judgement and that the eternal future of a believer is determined by the greater balance. God is Absolute and does not make relative judgements. How arrogant a system of belief , how foolish it is, and how satanic is it's origin. Satan declared "I will make myself equivalent to the Most High." Islam practices the same declaration

I clearly declare to you this day that the Holiness of God is a free gift available to all and is obtained by a single act of faith in Jesus Christ. And further, that the means of this so great Salvation is the plan and work of God, not man. And further still, that God's Justice judged sin at the cross by placing all of man's faults upon the underserving humanity of Jesus Christ who for our sakes became sin for us. God does not forgive based on sincerity. And finally, that the gift of God's Righteousness is given to each believer at the moment of faith is Jesus Christ. God communes only with those who share His Righteousness.

Islam rejects this work and instead seeks to establish it's own brand of holiness; how foolish , how arrogant, how satanic..

Christainity and Islam are polar opposites...


Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

Submit a comment on this item

Search by Enter name or date
Search Forum Comments:

Reader comments (21) on this item

Title By Date
Questions for Prof.Pipes
[w/response] [53 words]
infosifterMar 23, 2008 12:30
Thanks to Prof. Pipes [24 words]infosifterMar 24, 2008 17:14
Pain, support and apathy [78 words]Phil GreendJan 10, 2008 16:05
small note ( detail ) [89 words]catholicJul 19, 2007 20:07
Mathew 11:1-16 [217 words]André MarcNov 14, 2007 22:26
Stop whitewashing [87 words]Shabana MuhammadJan 7, 2007 00:19
Ignorance is bliss [12 words]PDMJan 5, 2007 12:47
Dangerous Dissection [237 words]Shivkumar SinghFeb 14, 2006 17:39
Nothing can convince me about Islam [42 words]MartinJul 13, 2007 02:12
Re: Nothing can convince me about Islam [114 words]Farhan AhmedJun 1, 2008 01:53
Stop whitewashing Islam [13 words]scrutatorAug 5, 2008 12:56
Appeasement [102 words]BryanDec 2, 2008 12:29
verification [14 words]lilyJan 31, 2009 07:51
Re: An interesting ...dissection [136 words]Reuben HorneAug 22, 2005 22:10
Islam and Islamism - Faith and Ideology [32 words]Karel Orlík,Jul 2, 2005 05:17
Regarding Judaism and Christianity being defective variants of Islam [303 words]Ihsan Ayyub QaziFeb 11, 2005 06:28
GOD AND ALLAH [1051 words]Jennifer KingJan 17, 2006 07:35
Endless useless argument [92 words]Liz ReynoldsFeb 15, 2006 15:44
Separation of Church and State [195 words]Michael KermonNov 22, 2007 10:20
⇒ God's Holiness cannot be matched by the most sincere efforts of man [252 words]William EastMay 18, 2008 16:41
church and state [571 words]truthseekersNov 20, 2008 09:49

Comment on this item

Name
Email Address (optional)
Title of Comments
Comments:

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

See the 25 most recent outstanding comments.

Back to top of page