|
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
on "The Roots of Iraq's Rebellion"Reader comment on item: The Roots of Iraq's Rebellion Submitted by Vlad (United States), Apr 13, 2004 at 14:38 I would have to disagree with the following statement:"In a clear pattern of avoidance, the imperial powers ?Britain, France, Holland, and Russia especially ? took control of far-away territories, while carefully avoiding their Muslim neighbors in North Africa, the Middle East, and Central Asia." Russia moved forcefully into the Central Asia and the Caucasus. It took them some 80-odd years to conqure the Caucasus but conquer they did. Same is for Central Asia. At the end of the 19th century that region was conquered and what stopped them was not the local resistance but the fact that they started clashing with Great Britain advancing from the south. The area that is today's Afganistan was formed as a buffer and it did not encompass any specific tribe or a state. And the conquered lands were quite peaceful under the rule of both the Tsar and the Communists. regards, -Vlad Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments". Comment on this item
|
Latest Articles Join Daniel Pipes on a Fact Finding Expedition to Israel, March 2012
For full details click here ADVERTISEMENTS
Most Mailed |
|||||||||||
|
All materials written by Daniel Pipes on this site © 1968-2012 Daniel Pipes. Email: daniel.pipes@gmail.com You can help support Daniel Pipes' work by making a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum. Daniel J. Pipes |
||||||||||||