69 million page views

Confusing, isn't it?

Reader comment on item: Something Rotten in Denmark?
in response to reader comment: Sword,thanks for correcting..

Submitted by Sword of Islam (United Kingdom), Feb 24, 2006 at 10:51

Yes, I agree it is very messy. The Telegraph re-published the story with the correction having misquoted the story originally - probably because it was being quoted as being 'fact' by too many other people as evidence of Danish racism. I would therefore assume that the motive for this reprint was to correct the mistake.

You will note that nobody has actually questioned this re-translation so I've no doubt of it's legitimacy. Opportunism could also be cited as a potential motive but given the context of the rest of the speech I think it reasonably clear that the original phrase 'opposition' simply doesn't 'fit' with the other sentiments expressed in the speech. It just doesn't match up. I don't know much about the Danish queen but I know that she isn't a radical. She seems like a very educated, articulate person (much like the very few Danes that I've met). But at least you are given her the 'benefit of the doubt' which can only be a good thing. Too many people in this situation have rigid positions that they are unprepared to question so that's encouraging.

As for the BBC, I mention them purely because when originally covering the cartoon story they said that one of the 'false' pictures had actually been published without properly checking the facts. Laziness.

As a whole, I am sure that both institutions are normally reliable but the mistake of one journalist can radically inflame a situation as so many of us automatically believe anything that we see on TV or read in the newspaper.

Let's educate each other.

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)