61 readers online now

98,675 comments by 26,222 readers

Go to Mobile Site

Latest Articles

 

ADVERTISEMENTS



Premium Links
by Wikio

Computers
Electronics
Communication
Appliances

eXTReMe Tracker

Why I agree with your reply to USA Today
Reader comment on item: Don't deal with terrorists

Submitted by Bryan Taplits (United States), Jan 25, 2006 at 10:29

Dr. Pipes,

Your reply to USA Today is why I look forward to your E-mailed articles addressed to me-and is one more reason I wish I were wealthy enough so that I could donate to the Middle Eastern Forum.

As I see it, while historical perspective is nice to persuade that-as President Bush put it-"There's a positive effect when you run for office.... People who run for office generally say, 'Vote for me, I'm looking forward to fixing you potholes.", history can only give you probabilities; the case that is being looked at could be different. Could be, but in Hamas' case, isn't. It was a bloodthirsty murderous organization yesterday, it is the same today, and it will be the no different tomorrow.

Hamas has no clue as to how to govern; what it is good at is murdering Israel citizens. It, in effect, is like a butcher knife: It is great at evisceration, but hasn't been proved to be effective at civilized governance-because it never has tried to govern. If it did "make the trains run on time", as Mussolini did, it would still be a murderous and tyrranical organization in the mold of a Fascistic Government-like Hitler or Mussolini or Saadam; and perhaps, devolving into a Communist Goverment-like that of Stalin and Castro.

The reason why it would never change from it's murderous calling is that...Hamas is a murderous organization. That is why it was created; that is its reason for being;and those who now run the organization would not like to see it change because: 1) They hate Israel 2) They hate Jews 3) They only know violence 4) If they went democratic and non-violent, in effect, they'd be implying that their total past life was foolish and a lie. And no man (especially a murderous one) would care to cater such a notion.

In my opinion, one of the main reasons Hamas will never change-ie. it is a pipe dream for President Bush to believe it and it's chieftains will-is that Hamas serves as a organized and partially successful repository of hate that its minions (and overseas liberals) can support.

I think President Bush has it backwards: Hamas can not change because, no matter how successful it becomes at governance, its followers will never change: They need Israel and Jews to revile and to murder. For the followers of Hamas, prejudice and discrimination is not a bad thing-if it is focused on and against the right subjects.

The main reason why it has support in the Middle East is because it has been many times successful in its mission to attempt to destroy Israel and kill Jews. If it ever changes (even though its governance leads to Ultima Thule), its followers would throw it out or never vote for it in the first place. Hate, in the Fascistic Middle-Eastern mode, will always overrule Civilized Prosperity.

As evidence, we need only go back to 9/11. The terrorists, although leading lives of middle class bliss, decided that they would be more blissful if they killed 3000 people, even should they die for it. In this case "Hate" triumphed. But 9/11 was more than the act of deluded terrorists, it was the activation of the Arabic-Middle-Eastern mindset. I still recall seeing on TV, Palestinians (and many others in the Middle-East) cheering that America suffered so.

Thus, Hamas does not lead, but rather follows the murderous and bloodridden trail of its Islamic-Fascistic adherents.




Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

Submit a comment on this item

Search by Enter name or date
Search Forum Comments:

Reader comments (67) on this item

Title By Date
Hamas - US Response To Election [216 words]Thomas Earl CannadyJan 30, 2006 12:45
Confirmation of Sharon's actions [146 words]Bruce BoymanJan 28, 2006 12:40
Should have voted for the crook [60 words]Liz OpalJan 27, 2006 15:38
How terrorism takes root .... [77 words]DebGJan 27, 2006 15:26
Be Careful of What you want... [337 words]Janet SidewaterJan 27, 2006 13:09
RE: J.S, Daniel and whaley [368 words]HarrakJan 27, 2006 09:22
A little girl and the lion [226 words]IanusJan 28, 2006 12:23
Christians in Palestinian area now must pay the dhimmi-tax [34 words]ItalianJan 27, 2006 05:57
Want to know what happens in islamic madrassas (religious schools)? see this story [211 words]HARI IYERJan 27, 2006 01:03
Government without a country- the pothole theory of Palestine [24 words]Ben van de PolderJan 27, 2006 00:27
The Pothole Theory of Democracy. [60 words]Simon RozanskiJan 26, 2006 19:11
Deal With Terrorists! [63 words]Ralph C Whaley MDJan 26, 2006 16:06
gratitude. [27 words]Irvin ShiffmanJan 26, 2006 15:39
They might regret their choice [173 words]SiddaJan 26, 2006 14:57
watch Hamas rebrand [31 words]michael cJan 26, 2006 14:56
'spin-off' [14 words]hari iyerJan 27, 2006 00:36
Don't Deal With Terrorists [17 words]bubbeJan 26, 2006 14:02
Hamas victory [138 words]VinodguptJan 26, 2006 11:32
Reality [500 words]DanielJan 26, 2006 06:04
Agree.. [194 words]J.S.Jan 26, 2006 15:25
Reality [27 words]IanusJan 26, 2006 17:05
President Bush's Demokratische Abenteuer Im Wunderland [266 words]orange yonasonJan 26, 2006 03:27
Hamas election victory [5 words]hari iyerJan 27, 2006 00:42
"Pothole theory of democracy" [72 words]J. Keen HollandJan 26, 2006 02:36
Daniel you know the world will continue talking... [57 words]Avi ElnekaveJan 26, 2006 01:53
Hamas win the elections [114 words]ItalianJan 26, 2006 14:58
Perhaps we should have known beforehand [129 words]BottomfishJan 26, 2006 20:37
Legitimization is a Resolution [122 words]JasonJan 26, 2006 01:11
hamas terror organization [136 words]DanJan 26, 2006 09:59
Hamas is a force [464 words]Al RameyJan 25, 2006 23:58
Freedom fighters or terrorists! [102 words]HarrakJan 25, 2006 22:31
the difference between Algerian freedom fighting and Palestinian terrorism [15 words]gbJan 26, 2006 13:44
No talk to the terrorists [162 words]F. ShakkiJan 25, 2006 22:28
Hamas is no worse than the P.A. [103 words]Jonathan UsherJan 25, 2006 20:39
RE: Hamas is no worse than the P.A. [78 words]IanusJan 26, 2006 15:30
dealing with hamas [29 words]bernard edelsteinJan 25, 2006 19:54
Hamas must win! [226 words]BorisJan 25, 2006 17:45
Hamas has won. What's next? [164 words]BorisJan 26, 2006 12:26
something missing - reply to DP column on current Palest "election" [262 words]ron thompsonJan 25, 2006 16:59
Recognize crude propaganda [142 words]Salomon BenzimraJan 25, 2006 16:55
Spinning out of control!! [134 words]renchJan 25, 2006 16:53
Who's to blame [60 words]YovenJan 25, 2006 15:51
Hamas is a terrorst ORG. who cares ... [59 words]FahadJan 25, 2006 15:32
Hamas [94 words]shahin s.Jan 25, 2006 21:27
Blazing new territory [74 words]David W. LincolnJan 25, 2006 15:25
True Knowledge or Propaganda? [200 words]Jane OJan 25, 2006 15:09
FEED THE TIGER [86 words]howlinJan 25, 2006 14:17
Dealing with the Terrorists. [65 words]JeffJan 25, 2006 13:59
Hamas...another 'respectable' partner for the dhimmi West? [151 words]IanusJan 25, 2006 13:45
the polity must value peaceful moderation in order to elicit such [107 words]marion d s dreyfusJan 25, 2006 13:40
loud, clear, and precise: Bravo! [250 words]John W. McGinleyJan 25, 2006 12:42
Give them enough rope [12 words]sirsethJan 25, 2006 12:13
Terrorist Politicians [159 words]Robert WillisJan 25, 2006 12:04
The Cancer In Our Midst [129 words]Seamus MacNemiJan 25, 2006 12:03
Arafat Didn't Give Up Terrorism Either [169 words]Liz WagnerJan 25, 2006 12:01
مساوئ حرية التعبير [222 words]mohamed.mJan 25, 2006 11:23
CAIR will be happy [34 words]DaisyJan 25, 2006 10:52
Democratic Declaration of War [300 words]Bob BadourJan 25, 2006 10:48
nevertheless Israel will rather talk than shoot [299 words]yuval brandstetterJan 26, 2006 17:50
U.S. policy will change [76 words]Steve KleinJan 25, 2006 10:46
Don't deal with terrorists [182 words]Carol DerbisJan 25, 2006 10:46
Response to Carol Derbis [104 words]Merry WhitneyJan 28, 2006 07:29
⇒ Why I agree with your reply to USA Today [573 words]Bryan TaplitsJan 25, 2006 10:29
Don't Deal [110 words]James BigaJan 25, 2006 09:49
Palestinian Election Could Affect Israeli Election Outcome In March [72 words]AnneMJan 25, 2006 09:33
gangsters [118 words]Robert KleinJan 25, 2006 08:53
Israel Rewarding Terrorism [251 words]John Randall PeacherJan 25, 2006 08:17

Comment on this item

Name
Email Address (optional)
Title of Comments
Comments:

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

See the 25 most recent outstanding comments.

ADVERTISEMENTS

All materials written by Daniel Pipes on this site © Daniel Pipes. Email: MeqMef@aol.com

You can help support Daniel Pipes' important work by making a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.