Daniel Pipes
Mobile Edition
Regular Site

Hypocrisy just got BIGGER
Reader comment on item: Europe's Burqa Wars
in response to reader comment: Gulatis naivete will be very costly

Submitted by Kashayar (India), Sep 9, 2009 at 05:30

You always harp about your great Hindu culture.

In reality you have two sets of cultures !

a very convenient public facade
- where the woman is treated with great respect
- a land of spirituality & tolerance and openness.

the actual reality which is always hidden from the outside world
- where girls are killed in the womb wherever posssible
- women are beaten, abused, raped and forced into submission
- conveniently exterminated if they refuse.

Talibanisation just 50 kms from Delhi the Indian capital

Death pills for wayward daughters

Women who choose their partners labelled as whores

These are just a few links from one of the most reputed Indian newspapers.

My society has its share of crazy and quixotic people but yours is equally worse. There things just differently labelled purdah becomes ghoonghat etc etc. We don't burn our women for dowry or kill the girl child unlike yours. Any person can enter our places of worship. In many cases the so called lower castes still find it difficult to enter your places of worship laws notwithstanding. We do have our share of people who kill others in the name of religion. You do the same thing, gangraping nuns and murdering priests of other faiths and yet pretend to be secular.

The only difference between me and you being the degree of hypocrisy. You are just BIGGER hypocrites !

Now you may be different from the rest of your country cousins. So am I and many others like me.


Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

Submit a comment on this item

Search by Enter name or date
Search Forum Comments:

Reader comments (53) on this item

Title By Date
Burqa or not to Burqa [93 words]DavePOct 1, 2009 13:48
God bless that lady [9 words]dfwhite19438Sep 27, 2009 02:53
headscarf ban in vlaanderen(dutch speaking belgium) starting from 2010 [42 words]savingthewesternworldSep 16, 2009 12:41
Double standards [183 words]PrashantAug 30, 2009 23:54
The thing about living in the EU [28 words]Straight_Talk_LuigiSep 1, 2009 00:56
Time to unveil [168 words]Rebecca MouldsAug 16, 2009 14:19
France downhill [67 words]StopoilJul 19, 2009 18:53
My theory of the Burqa [208 words]LynnJul 16, 2009 07:57
Sarkozy's Fatwa [26 words]Vinod GulatiJul 13, 2009 22:37
legality of banning burka [244 words]G. VishvasJul 19, 2009 05:58
Banning anything. [163 words]Vinod GulatiJul 20, 2009 12:17
Gulatis naivete will be very costly [354 words]G.VishvasJul 21, 2009 10:44
⇒ Hypocrisy just got BIGGER [252 words]KashayarSep 9, 2009 05:30
competition about who is the bigger hypocrite [90 words]G.VishvasSep 9, 2009 21:28
You win the competition hands on [206 words]KashayarSep 11, 2009 06:48
You cannot unilaterally decide who wins [271 words]G.VishvasSep 12, 2009 20:53
Common sense decides the winner [472 words]KashayarSep 14, 2009 07:44
Intelligence includes common sense [884 words]G.VishvasSep 14, 2009 20:02
Common sense is quite uncommon [801 words]KashayarSep 18, 2009 04:05
discussing reasonably - how to do it [1448 words]G.VishvasSep 20, 2009 01:41
It's true [33 words]Vermilion8Nov 5, 2009 13:32
Europe's Burqa Wars [192 words]moJul 12, 2009 06:34
Let us take a clue from passport pictures requirements [219 words]George PJul 12, 2009 00:57
UK's poll decision [49 words]James AureliusApr 1, 2009 00:57
Prostitutes had to wear hijab 7000 years ago [2007 words]n.krishnaDec 5, 2006 02:59
Respect [43 words]NJ CastroNov 7, 2008 05:49
Jews not included? [119 words]Hannah Y. GrauDec 7, 2008 16:20
To Krishna [364 words]moJul 12, 2009 06:17
Are you any better ? [80 words]KashayarSep 9, 2009 05:39
Why I am against the Burqa [214 words]Octavio JohansonNov 21, 2006 05:42
An outrageous idea [43 words]Aisha GayleJul 21, 2009 16:02
Don't like it in the UK [8 words]Straight_Talk_LuigiNov 13, 2009 17:58
This is just show that Europeans have no tolerance and oppress women [84 words]tarikurNov 18, 2006 15:34
Praise be to the Dutch [53 words]Octavio JohansonNov 18, 2006 19:29
The problem with tolerance [165 words]Octavio JohansonNov 19, 2006 14:17
Well, now... [238 words]munineyeDec 18, 2008 03:34
Europe's burqa wars [254 words]BrunoNov 18, 2006 14:24
burqas [9 words]helloFeb 6, 2007 06:36
The march of progress [134 words]RajahOct 26, 2006 01:22
who is immoral? [86 words]AnitaOct 25, 2006 18:03
Zero Tolerance for the Burqua [203 words]Octavio JohansonNov 19, 2006 05:12
God bless the dutch [32 words]George PJul 12, 2009 01:03
Regarding Europe's Burqa Wars posted August 25, 2005 [140 words]MoraaFeb 25, 2006 20:09
burkah the shield [52 words]saq from ukMay 1, 2006 17:55
Typical [259 words]AaronMay 7, 2006 07:20
Not a typical response !! [261 words]KhatibMay 11, 2006 15:20
un-moral morals [43 words]susanSep 23, 2006 15:14
saq, how naive... [47 words]susanSep 23, 2006 15:17
advice on the superior muslim mothers [61 words]susanSep 23, 2006 15:20
Questions [209 words]oswaldSep 24, 2006 01:48
Only a man can [121 words]oswaldSep 24, 2006 06:05
Musli mwomen better? [204 words]YnnatchkahDec 8, 2008 02:48
What about .....? [92 words]ISisJul 13, 2009 02:30

Comment on this item

Name
Email Address (optional)
Title of Comments
Comments:

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

See the 25 most recent outstanding comments.

Back to top of page