| Daniel Pipes Mobile Edition Regular Site |
|
| Home | Articles | Blog | Reviews | Search | |
Submitted by G.Vishvas (India), Sep 14, 2009 at 20:02
Intelligence includes common sense. In any case you, as one of the two participants in this competition, cannot decide who the winner is or shall be (hoping it will be a long drawn out competition).
islam is (generally) an expansionist ideology - hindu religions (note the plural) are (generally)not. Hindu fascism is a reaction to the successes of islamic fascism and imperialism and deceits in the Indian Subcontinent (ISC). The hindu-muslim conflict takes place in India and not in Makkah/Madinah. This clearly means the muslim is the quisling of an alien ideology, a totalitarian imperialist ideology created in Makkah/Madinah by an arab.
All those who entered ISC became indians. They gave up all previous loyalties. Only muslims continued to retain their loyalty to the alien extra-territorial arab superiority and hegemony. Hindu means originally one who lives in the Sindhu river basin. The muslims extended this term to refer to all those living in the ISC except the muslims. The word Indian is derived from the word hindu (since the greeks could not pronounce h or u, they made it into indos, plural indoi). The word Hinduism (as a supposedly singular religion) was coined by the british in the 1830s.
The kuran teaches muslims even today (more than ever before) that they are a separate, superior and supremacy-entitled nation or supra-nation. The muslim population component (in 60 years) has increased from 6.5% to 16% in India, the hindu population component in Pakistan West has decreased from 25% to 2% and in East (Bangladesh) from 40% to 10%. These numbers prove that muslims are continuing their aggression even today. How can they then claim to be peaceful, respectful, dutiful, loyal co-citizens?
Islam has been always a fascist totalitarian imperialist and terrorizing ideology even since the times of Mohammad. Islam has been an instrument or arab hegemony, racism and arabization since 1400 years. Enforcing arabic script and language on non-arabs, arab personal names on non-arabs, a fascist primitive arab tribal-god-concept on non-arabs – that has been the result of islam. Indian-ness and muslim-ness are incompatible. A muslim can only pretend to be loyal to India. Honesty and islam rarely go together because the muslim is under compulsion to glorify islam, Mohammad and kuran which causes islam to become a kuran-centered and Mohammad-centered fascism. Pretensions of loyalty are more dangerous than open rejection. Islam will never allow muslims to be genuinely loyal to India and indianess.
The muslim understanding of brotherhood is exemplified by the relation between Dara Shukoh and Aurangzeb (who assassinated the elder brother Dara in 1659). The hindu understanding is exemplified by the Ramayana. It was a great blunder by Mahatma Gandhi to have issued the slogan hindu muslim bhai bhai.
There is no anti-minority religious fascism in India by hindus – but rather a weak and belated reaction to the disloyal anti-indian ideologies and activities of the muslims (in general, but with some few exceptions) and some few christians. The hindu-sikh conflict arose only after some self-appointed sikh leaders started imitating the muslims, the muslim league and Jinnah. The Zoroastrians and jews have never faced any problems with hindus in India. Ask them if they are agreeing to what the muslims are trying to portray about the hindus.
The partition of India is a result of the kuran – hence to blame Jinnah for it is like blaming the knife used for a murder. Jinnah was only trying to recharge his islamic credit card and reserve a place for himself in the arab allah,s heaven by joining the muslim league. Nehru and Patel were perfectly right in rejecting muslim demands which were all based on the kuranic teachings causing muslims to be agents of Islamic-arabic imperialism and their supremacy goals. Even if hindus had given in to the shameless and treacherous demands of the quislings of alien anti-indian islam it would have only postponed the partition of british India by a few years. Muslims do not have and cannot have the ability or the desire to live peacefully, respectfully and honestly with non-muslims. In the coming years this will become even more clear. As the muslim population component increases and the kuranic fascism takes deeper roots in the muslim soul this will lead to a socio-political disaster all over the world. An islam-based society will be like the one described by George Orwell in his two novels ,Animal farm, and ,1984,. I hope secular, pseudo-secular, opportunist, timid hindus realize this and deal with islam and its quislings with greater distrust.
There are good human beings among muslims – but their goodness only acts to camouflage islam,s inherent fascism and arab-centric imperialism. It is not the case that some muslims bring a bad name to islam – it is islam bringing bad guidance and dishonesty to muslims and misusing them all (even the good ones) for its own evil totalitarian designs. Born-muslims from Pakistan have written to me about how disgusting, arrogant and evil islam is. Mohamad Iqbal wrote that kuran and sufism are incompatible. Earlier sufism destroyed islam, now islam has destroyed sufism. What the sufis did not realize was that every praise of kuran and Mohammad will lead to a kuran-based Mohammad-centred fascism. And that is the logical and unavoidable consequence of islam. But islamic indoctrination will not allow muslims to realize this.
Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.
| Title | By | Date |
| Burqa or not to Burqa [93 words] | DaveP | Oct 1, 2009 13:48 |
| God bless that lady [9 words] | dfwhite19438 | Sep 27, 2009 02:53 |
| headscarf ban in vlaanderen(dutch speaking belgium) starting from 2010 [42 words] | savingthewesternworld | Sep 16, 2009 12:41 |
| Double standards [183 words] | Prashant | Aug 30, 2009 23:54 |
| ↔ The thing about living in the EU [28 words] | Straight_Talk_Luigi | Sep 1, 2009 00:56 |
| Time to unveil [168 words] | Rebecca Moulds | Aug 16, 2009 14:19 |
| France downhill [67 words] | Stopoil | Jul 19, 2009 18:53 |
| My theory of the Burqa [208 words] | Lynn | Jul 16, 2009 07:57 |
| Sarkozy's Fatwa [26 words] | Vinod Gulati | Jul 13, 2009 22:37 |
| ↔ legality of banning burka [244 words] | G. Vishvas | Jul 19, 2009 05:58 |
| ↔ Banning anything. [163 words] | Vinod Gulati | Jul 20, 2009 12:17 |
| ↔ Gulatis naivete will be very costly [354 words] | G.Vishvas | Jul 21, 2009 10:44 |
| ↔ Hypocrisy just got BIGGER [252 words] | Kashayar | Sep 9, 2009 05:30 |
| ↔ competition about who is the bigger hypocrite [90 words] | G.Vishvas | Sep 9, 2009 21:28 |
| ↔ You win the competition hands on [206 words] | Kashayar | Sep 11, 2009 06:48 |
| ↔ You cannot unilaterally decide who wins [271 words] | G.Vishvas | Sep 12, 2009 20:53 |
| ↔ Common sense decides the winner [472 words] | Kashayar | Sep 14, 2009 07:44 |
| ↔ ⇒ Intelligence includes common sense [884 words] | G.Vishvas | Sep 14, 2009 20:02 |
| ↔ Common sense is quite uncommon [801 words] | Kashayar | Sep 18, 2009 04:05 |
| ↔ discussing reasonably - how to do it [1448 words] | G.Vishvas | Sep 20, 2009 01:41 |
| ↔ It's true [33 words] | Vermilion8 | Nov 5, 2009 13:32 |
| Europe's Burqa Wars [192 words] | mo | Jul 12, 2009 06:34 |
| Let us take a clue from passport pictures requirements [219 words] | George P | Jul 12, 2009 00:57 |
| UK's poll decision [49 words] | James Aurelius | Apr 1, 2009 00:57 |
| Prostitutes had to wear hijab 7000 years ago [2007 words] | n.krishna | Dec 5, 2006 02:59 |
| ↔ Respect [43 words] | NJ Castro | Nov 7, 2008 05:49 |
| ↔ Jews not included? [119 words] | Hannah Y. Grau | Dec 7, 2008 16:20 |
| ↔ To Krishna [364 words] | mo | Jul 12, 2009 06:17 |
| ↔ Are you any better ? [80 words] | Kashayar | Sep 9, 2009 05:39 |
| Why I am against the Burqa [214 words] | Octavio Johanson | Nov 21, 2006 05:42 |
| ↔ An outrageous idea [43 words] | Aisha Gayle | Jul 21, 2009 16:02 |
| ↔ Don't like it in the UK [8 words] | Straight_Talk_Luigi | Nov 13, 2009 17:58 |
| This is just show that Europeans have no tolerance and oppress women [84 words] | tarikur | Nov 18, 2006 15:34 |
| ↔ Praise be to the Dutch [53 words] | Octavio Johanson | Nov 18, 2006 19:29 |
| ↔ The problem with tolerance [165 words] | Octavio Johanson | Nov 19, 2006 14:17 |
| ↔ Well, now... [238 words] | munineye | Dec 18, 2008 03:34 |
| Europe's burqa wars [254 words] | Bruno | Nov 18, 2006 14:24 |
| ↔ burqas [9 words] | hello | Feb 6, 2007 06:36 |
| The march of progress [134 words] | Rajah | Oct 26, 2006 01:22 |
| who is immoral? [86 words] | Anita | Oct 25, 2006 18:03 |
| ↔ Zero Tolerance for the Burqua [203 words] | Octavio Johanson | Nov 19, 2006 05:12 |
| ↔ God bless the dutch [32 words] | George P | Jul 12, 2009 01:03 |
| Regarding Europe's Burqa Wars posted August 25, 2005 [140 words] | Moraa | Feb 25, 2006 20:09 |
| ↔ burkah the shield [52 words] | saq from uk | May 1, 2006 17:55 |
| ↔ Typical [259 words] | Aaron | May 7, 2006 07:20 |
| ↔ Not a typical response !! [261 words] | Khatib | May 11, 2006 15:20 |
| ↔ un-moral morals [43 words] | susan | Sep 23, 2006 15:14 |
| ↔ saq, how naive... [47 words] | susan | Sep 23, 2006 15:17 |
| ↔ advice on the superior muslim mothers [61 words] | susan | Sep 23, 2006 15:20 |
| ↔ Questions [209 words] | oswald | Sep 24, 2006 01:48 |
| ↔ Only a man can [121 words] | oswald | Sep 24, 2006 06:05 |
| ↔ Musli mwomen better? [204 words] | Ynnatchkah | Dec 8, 2008 02:48 |
| ↔ What about .....? [92 words] | ISis | Jul 13, 2009 02:30 |