3 readers online now  |  69 million page views

M & W Mean that Dr. Pipes and Everyone Who Disagrees With Them -- Is The lobby

Reader comment on item: Is Campus Watch Part of a Conspiracy? [On Mearsheimer-Walt and "The Israeli Lobby"]

Submitted by Sofa Sogood (United States), Feb 24, 2008 at 05:24

Although I think that Dr. Pipes gets it, refuses to give credence to, and might be waiting to see if M & W will state it bluntly, the answer to,

< No Lobby told me to start Campus Watch >

is, that what they mean is that, Dr. Pipes Is (capital T lower case L) The lobby.

Few have actually stated it, but it seems so clear that the meaning of M & W is that anyone at all who truly supports Israel (as opposed to the, I Love Israel, Let's Watch It Get Destroyed, school), and

Anyone at All who Disagrees with their viewpoint, Is The lobby.

This includes anyone, whether they be Jew, Christian, Journalist, Politician, member of a group or organization, or just any ordinary citizen.

According to them (aside from the views of obviously biased Jews and certain Christians), in their opinion, since views opposed to theirs have no value or worth whatsoever, the majority of our population who disagrees with them has been duped, and that dupedom also qualifies them to be part of The lobby.

These dupes, according to M & W, have been unduly influenced, largely due to the fact that the Media is controlled by The lobby, which is mostly, but not only, composed of the Jews. The lobby, again, includes all of the people who disagree with M & W, which includes the dupes themselves. In some ways it's circular. Not only do Jews, excuse me, some or most Jews, dupe the dupes, but the dupes dupe other dupes as well. And they are all The lobby.

It's Aipac, the genuine Lobby, and The lobby (inclusive of Aipac itself, Jews, Christians, various groups and organizations, and other ordinary citizens) which through both nefarious dealings and the apparently very anti-American threat of losing votes by going against the wishes of the public, who are also The lobby, which literally, frighteningly and sometimes eerily, forces Congress to submit to it's Dark Will. And, of course, those (practically non-existent) Congressmen who honestly believe in the Israeli cause, are also either part of the The lobby or its dupes who are The lobby too.

There really isn't any need to go into how absurd their claim is, for one, about the Media. Our Media rarely gives the whole picture including the Israeli side. The public seems to side with the Israelis in spite of the Media. If there has been any duping, it's been the other way. These days, the only place to get any real information is from the Internet. I'm sure M & W would be thrilled if the U.S. Media were more like the English or the French, etc., where, like in their own works, there is a consistent and continuous demonization of Israel, without ever, ever giving the European public even a peek at even part of the whole story, much less the truth. [An interesting anecdote on the web was an interview with a recent immigrant to France from a Muslim country. He said he was never anti-semitic and never hated Israel until he came to France. The Interviewer asked if he was influenced by Al-Jazeera. He replied that he never watches it, and was influenced solely by the French press.]

Has anyone noticed it's no longer necessary to call it, The Israel lobby, but that, The lobby, is enough? What does that say about what M & W intended to accomplish?

Their hope is that they can just pidgeonhole anyone by using (don't forget, They are using Their Control against U.S. interests) that (now) disparaging smear of a phrase, and can automatically thereby de-legitimize whatever it is They say or do. They are The lobby. They are all different (but really wink, wink, They are all the same). We've got Their number. No need for accuracy. Innuendo is perfectly acceptable. No need for debate. All that is needed to get the message across is to say the phrase. Oh, The lobby, The Bad and Controlling lobby. No more acceptable, legitimate testimony taken seriously from The Suspect Jew lobby.

Framing their argument as, The Israel lobby Controls and has Overbearing Influence... is so clearly aimed at tweaking both vague, latent anti-semitic feelings and judeophobia. It was also very deliberately aimed at Jews who would have to respond because they would not be able to ignore this diatribe. Thus, and by subjecting the respectability of their credentials to their paranoid and bigoted fantasies, they set themselves up for plenty, plenty of attention. How clever.

Lumping together each and every person, and everything they do that even remotely appears to be helpful to the cause of Israel, or even the Middle East in general, especially if they are Jews, as The lobby, is nothing but name calling. The exclusion of anti-Israel and veiled anti-Israel Jews is ultimately irrelevant here. The lobby has already come to be a code word for Jew and only sometimes includes Jew lovers. Come on now -- what must this or M & W then be called?

Dr. Pipes is very right that it would have been better to ignore their screed of a paper, but, unfortunately, it wasn't possible for most Jews to just allow such a paper to go without comment, precisely because it was written by well-positioned professors. Considering who it came from, it was too false, hurtful and shocking, and thus irresistible. It's true that had it been ignored, it would have faded away.

It's now an oozing and contageous pustule.

It's an ugly thing that Mearsheimer and Walt have done.


Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Submitting....

Submit a comment on this item

<< Previous Comment      Next Comment >>

Reader comments (79) on this item

Title Commenter Date Thread
Interesting that they claim that we wish to control what is said about Israel, in islamic countries you have no freedom of speech. [51 words]Phil GreendMar 19, 2010 21:44170425
MERSHEIMER AND WALT AND ALLIES, CAUGHT IN THEIR LIES, ER, DISTORTIONS [670 words]JERRY BORISAug 13, 2008 17:30136682
M & W Mean that Dr. Pipes and Everyone Who Disagrees With Them -- Is The lobby [927 words]Sofa SogoodFeb 24, 2008 05:24120946
Phobic Fantasies of Exaggerated Jewish Power Distracts Attention from Vital Issues of National Interest and Brings Harm to Those Nations Who Indulge Them [1044 words]Sofa SogoodFeb 24, 2008 05:04120944
Sent to Mearsheimer. [285 words]YnnatchkahFeb 23, 2008 19:43120906
Great Links to other Critiques: [17 words]PTOct 8, 2007 13:30110742
The only thing missing from their lecture in LA was Wagner playing as you walked in [84 words]Allyson Rowen TaylorSep 24, 2007 09:27109561
Meisenheimer & Walt's characterization of Campus Watch [124 words]YzoleowlJun 29, 2006 21:0848487
Thank God for Campus Watch [123 words]Steve BaldwinMay 19, 2006 11:3945958
a question; a comment [277 words]roger wilkinsonMay 18, 2006 23:3745928
Your 2nd point [419 words]Robert ArbetmanMay 15, 2006 09:1045642
TO: R. ARBETMAN [167 words]Nick WadenaJun 12, 2006 01:5245642
Nick, you're wasting your time [62 words]Track JimonSep 11, 2007 11:4945642
another conspiracy theory? [48 words]robert fusfeldMay 14, 2006 10:2545572
Campus Watch a Conspiracy? [29 words]Monty PogodaMay 14, 2006 07:4545564
Lobbies [81 words]S.E. CervantesMay 13, 2006 16:2945526
What's Different About the Israeli Lobby [19 words]DougMay 15, 2006 11:5345526
What makes them so special! [185 words]Robert ArbetmanMay 15, 2006 16:5645526
Do you have an answer?!! [11 words]Seth CervantesMay 17, 2006 07:2745526
Israeli Lobby Supreme in U.S. Mid-East Policy [50 words]DougMay 17, 2006 19:0845526
The Israel Lobby [35 words]MaryMay 27, 2006 08:1145526
The Israeli lobby [31 words]donvanJul 11, 2006 12:3745526
Sam Saad - Arab racist 'lobbyist' [738 words]LouisaFeb 23, 2012 07:2845526
The logic of Mersheimer-Walt (M-W) [179 words]steven LMay 13, 2006 16:0145525
Research quality [381 words]S SilversteinMay 13, 2006 14:1445520
Lobby! [14 words]HarrakMay 13, 2006 12:1645515
Arabs or Jews? [42 words]robert aMay 13, 2006 10:1845507
Arabs or Jews! some food for the hungry intellects.. [349 words]HarrakMay 14, 2006 11:1645507
Harraksment [58 words]Sword of Islam & The Babies of BeslanMay 18, 2006 08:0145507
1Muslims are hard working [263 words]InfidelMay 18, 2006 21:1045507
Infidel? [6 words]Sword of Islam & The Babies of BeslanMay 24, 2006 16:3545507
Why be sarcastic and mean? [391 words]DavidMay 26, 2006 00:3245507
david [150 words]ahmad zafireMay 28, 2006 21:4245507
A pat on the back for David [13 words]ramsesyOct 3, 2006 18:4945507
so what do you classify as Israeli? [173 words]mohammedOct 30, 2006 18:4045507
mohamed -contributor- The he he mmm scholar [164 words]HarrakNov 3, 2006 00:1845507
Let's rate lobbies [43 words]Robert AMay 13, 2006 10:0345505
Further comment on Mesrsheimer and Walts views [96 words]Evan CowartMay 12, 2006 23:1745467
Daniel Pipes is my Hero [33 words]Mark HarrisMay 12, 2006 20:1445454
An ironic twist of fate [143 words]Robert ArbetmanMay 15, 2006 17:2645454
WORDS LIKE DARTS! [19 words]Lou StouchMay 12, 2006 19:5345453
The Logic of Meirsheimer/Walt is "America Ought Not to Be Allied to Israel" [207 words]John GellesMay 12, 2006 19:2445452
re Pipes' defence against the criticism of Campus Watch [210 words]Jascha KesslerMay 12, 2006 18:4345450
Better proofing of original submittal, titled "Pipes is piping...." [217 words]Jascha KesslerMay 13, 2006 16:3745450
campus watch [63 words]ralph shapiroMay 12, 2006 18:0245448
Who should investigate whom? [19 words]Moshe Even-ShoshanMay 12, 2006 16:3145442
Virus infecting Academe? [759 words]yzoleowlMay 12, 2006 15:5045438
Same old hot air! [121 words]concernedMay 12, 2006 15:0345433
Academia [132 words]donvanMay 12, 2006 14:3845431
Israelites, the Blessed [116 words]Jay Martin BennettMay 12, 2006 14:1445427
Reply to JM Bennett [117 words]Charles FortnerMay 13, 2006 01:0245427
Amen to that [21 words]Yuval Brandstetter MDMay 13, 2006 14:1145427
Chinese the blessed! wake up snoring Bennett [79 words]HarrakMay 14, 2006 20:3345427
Amen! [26 words]HarrakMay 14, 2006 20:3845427
The Harraks of the World [80 words]Jay Martin BennettMay 15, 2006 07:3445427
Quantity vs quality [16 words]true believerMay 16, 2006 02:0845427
Chinese the Blessed [825 words]dawnAug 20, 2006 09:0245427
The Jay Martin Bennett's of this world [113 words]Kinakin kidJan 28, 2008 23:3945427
1Event at American University on Arab Media [155 words]
w/response from Daniel Pipes
Elizabeth A. WilliamsMay 12, 2006 13:1945422
I spy with my little eye, something that is ..... [52 words]David W. LincolnMay 12, 2006 13:1545421
Is Campus Watch Part of a Conspiracy? [109 words]steven LMay 12, 2006 12:3145418
Arab paranoia [121 words]Octavio JohansonMay 12, 2006 14:3845418
"Arabs" [91 words]Abir ChaabanMay 12, 2006 16:3845418
Jewish conspiracy [103 words]steven LMay 12, 2006 20:3045418
pro arab universities [130 words]frank keefeMay 13, 2006 05:0145418
Dear Ari Chaaban [194 words]Octavio JohansonMay 13, 2006 17:4445418
iran/arabs [44 words]frank keefeMay 14, 2006 06:1045418
Let me clarify [214 words]Abir ChaabanMay 14, 2006 21:5145418
tests will show who is arab [151 words]G.BisvasMay 15, 2006 11:5245418
your asking too much.....could but would never happen. [117 words]ahmadzafireMay 18, 2006 16:0945418
arabs' right to be paranoid [128 words]omarAug 17, 2006 09:1545418
Arabs right to be Paranoid ? [579 words]dawnAug 20, 2006 08:0645418
Pro-Arab? Pro-American then, or Pro-Israeli in your case [167 words]MohammedOct 30, 2006 18:0145418
I never read past the first two words of posts in all-caps [17 words]Abu NudnikDec 27, 2010 12:3545418
Open response to Mearsheimer and walt [217 words]Maurice OstroffMay 12, 2006 12:0345415
Are they serious? [183 words]Abir ChaabanMay 12, 2006 12:0345414
How expected! [72 words]Kenneth S. BesigMay 12, 2006 12:0345413
Is that Lobby with a capital L [31 words]MichaelMay 12, 2006 11:3145408
Campus Watch [12 words]Walter D'UllMay 12, 2006 11:2445406

Comment on this item

Mark my comment as a response to M & W Mean that Dr. Pipes and Everyone Who Disagrees With Them -- Is The lobby by Sofa Sogood

Email me if someone replies to my comment

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

See recent outstanding comments.

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

ADVERTISEMENTS

eXTReMe Tracker

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2019 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)