Sent to Mearsheimer.
Reader comment on item: Is Campus Watch Part of a Conspiracy? [On Mearsheimer-Walt and The "Israeli Lobby"]

Submitted by Ynnatchkah (United States), Feb 23, 2008 at 19:43

TO: j-mearsheimer@uchicago.edu

Dear Sir:

You declared:

"... Do you think [publishers] Farrar, Straus and Giroux, as a serious publishing house, would allow us to do sloppy scholarship?"...

Yes, Mr. Mearsheimer, especially today in America, YES - for money, for Islamists money and with the guarantee that there are enough stupid and illiterates ones that will buy such a sloppy or better saying phony publication- YES, they would publish such a piece of infantile trash.

Your argument is unacceptable. Indeed, IT flies in the face of common sense. Take as an example Filkestein....This is the disease that deflagrates America. Once ceased, America will be AMERICA again.

AND, YOU SAY:

"... Paid two fact-checkers $16,000 "...

IT flies in the face of common sense...What...you are so incompetent that you need to pay a fact checkers? And, who are the checkers?....Come one......not even in elementary school for a simple research a teacher lets children present something copied paste from the Web, in such a manner, AND did you 24/7 supervised these "Checkers"? How inferior...

In my opinion, I can barely believe an incompetent like you, an opportunist wanting to live the American dream in terms of money, is allowed in this country:

Well, perhaps, only in Islamist America…..

God forbid paying to study under your administration. How inferior your service is.

Definitely, only teachers that address the medical fields and sciences in America still worth something...Humanities were taken over by opportunist and thus parasites, unable to survive in real market.

Are you macho enough to shove it, Dear John?

Go play victimhood….What a joke you are- as mirrored by your arguments...

Remember:

Your arguments are good….. BUT good JUST to the level of your kind, NOT my kind.

---

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.