|
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
Fine with me but it negates Israel's right of returnReader comment on item: [UNRWA:] The Refugee Curse Submitted by Susan Kerin (United States), Aug 22, 2003 at 14:31 With regard to Pipes' statute of limitation philosphy (i.e, that all rights to return are null and void when the parents die), I'm fine with that. But, of course, it would also apply to Israelis who claim a "right of return" based on a rationale that they might have had relatives living on the land 4,000 years ago. I presume most of those original refugees are deceased as well. Regards...SusanNote: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments". Comment on this item
|
Latest Articles Join Daniel Pipes on a Fact Finding Expedition to Israel, March 2012
For full details click here ADVERTISEMENTS
Most Mailed |
|||||||||||
|
All materials written by Daniel Pipes on this site © 1968-2012 Daniel Pipes. Email: daniel.pipes@gmail.com You can help support Daniel Pipes' work by making a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum. Daniel J. Pipes |
||||||||||||