69 million page views

Disagree with the term

Reader comment on item: Muslim Zionism
in response to reader comment: Yes you're right but...

Submitted by Mickey (United States), Jun 8, 2006 at 13:35

I greatly admire Daniel Pipes' work. However, introducing a term like "Muslim Zionism" into the deadly game, and positing greater Islamic 'love' and fealty for Jerusalem is simply fueling the enemy and besmirching the meaning of "Zion" itself. I firmly believe there is no genuine love for Jerusalem among the Muslims. The gigantic propaganda rallies are merely designed to weaken righteous Jewish claims to the city. That the future of the Jerusalem itself would even dare be a possible object of Israeli "negotiations" is yet another tragic sign of the secular, leftist bankruptcy which has been so ruinous to the Jewish people.


Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2023 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)