69 million page views

Another One

Reader comment on item: Something Rotten in Denmark?
in response to reader comment: Why killing a peace activist ?

Submitted by JustMe (United States), Mar 16, 2006 at 18:07

So according to your version, there was no surrender. The Bani-Qurayza broke a treaty by helping other exiled Jews with food and supplies and stocking up on weapons in order to 'more than likely' sneak attack the defenseless Muslim's weak side. I don't know, Another One. Sounds like these Bani-Qurayza were correct -- They needed more weapons against such a ruthless warrior.

How can this be so different than what I read and everyone else read, seeing as I quoted from your own sources?

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2024 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)