69 million page views

The distinction is, indeed, important, Ms. Boorstein.

Reader comment on item: Once considered anti-Islam, senior scholar says he's now in the middle

Submitted by Michael Joyce (United States), Aug 18, 2010 at 15:35

If Ms. Boorstein's final question is not facetious, then I think that it is, indeed, an important distinction.

Dr. Pipes has been consistent for years that, in his own words, "militant Islam is the problem, moderate Islam is the solution."

The radicals at CAIR and elsewhere have just as consistently besmirched his good name by misquoting and misattributing his words. Douglas William "Ibrahim" Hooper and Hussein Ibish are among the most vocal of his dishonest critics, in my opinion. The cry of "Islamophobe" from these two, referencing Dr. Pipes, is especially egregious. If "Islamophile" had the same sting, I would employ it against Hooper, Ibish and many, many others.


Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2023 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)