Submitted by Christopher(United States), Sep 30, 2002 at 23:33
I'm sure that Daniel knew he was stepping into the liberals' den...(pun intended)
Phil Donahue has never met a conservative he didn't like. His entire career is based on the existence of such.
But note that, like most liberals, he can't stand alone.
I can't tell from this transcript, but I'd be willing to bet, just based on Daniel Pipes' responses, he was typically 'donahued' by a liberal who can't put two sentences together in a cogent argument. So an 'alleged' professor, (yes, he may have the title, but he hasn't proven it to me) is brought on who...
(a)starts off with personal attacks on the 'failed academic', whatever that means. (My suspicion is a 'failed academic' is one who actually succeeded in the real world.), and then...
(b) starts claiming harrassment and hacking...(hacking? Emails are now hacking? Spam yes...)
Lest I forget,
(c) provides no proof of any of the above.
Typical of liberals. Also typical is that time ran out ...
Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.