Daniel Pipes
Mobile Edition
Regular Site

Bravo, Dr. Daniel Pipes
Reader comment on item: Campus Watch - A Good Idea?

Submitted by Arlene Swartzman (United States), Oct 6, 2002 at 02:49

Bravo, Daniel Pipes:

My information about you is that you are highly qualified to speak on the Middle East since you have a Ph.D. from Harvard in Arabic History, have taught and published in the field, and know Arabic. Aren't you Dr. Daniel Pipes?

Judith Butler's work is such a morass of gobbledy-gook, it's no wonder she's confused on this issue as well. (Try reading her essay in the book, For Love of Country, for one.)

My view is that when one signs up to teach a college course, one is expected to teach the class. One goes to a political rally during non-work time -- or is this Mr. Dabashi's real work and classroom teaching merely interferes?

Thank you for your good work! It's unfortunate that Donahue hasn't a clue as to what Campus Watch is about, and that he let mud-slinging pass for informed discussion. Campus Watch has important work to do and helps all college students feel welcome on campus. Dabashi's nervous response shows that publicity about poor teaching and propagandizing on campus are not what parents are paying for and what students should expect. Can the parents be mobilized? Alumni?

Many thanks,

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

Submit a comment on this item

Search by Enter name or date
Search Forum Comments:

Reader comments (46) on this item

Title By Date
Are you all missing the point? [411 words]David WoodOct 9, 2002 05:03
KUDOS TO DANIEL PIPES [162 words]BruceOct 8, 2002 20:58
A failed academic? I don't think so. [185 words]Maryallene OtisOct 8, 2002 09:48
The pot calling the kettle black [178 words]SusanOct 7, 2002 16:05
⇒ Bravo, Dr. Daniel Pipes [193 words]Arlene SwartzmanOct 6, 2002 02:49
McCarthyism? I think not. [127 words]Maurice TawilOct 6, 2002 02:34
Donahue = Liberal Bias [89 words]M. LouchheimOct 5, 2002 23:05
Thank You, Mr. Pipes!! [92 words]Carrie OkayOct 5, 2002 04:30
Disappointed
[w/response] [74 words]
Jed GelberOct 5, 2002 01:32
Great job; Dabashi is a worrisome and dangerous 'joke' [87 words]Stanley MarguliesOct 4, 2002 00:22
Campus Watch: Bringing Balance to a Lopsided Discussion [149 words]Eva GoldmanOct 3, 2002 17:44
Keep it up, Dr. Pipes [208 words]Ted RoseOct 3, 2002 06:02
Cry 'Wolf!!!' one more time!!!! [75 words]Roger EllisOct 3, 2002 01:54
Who's the real McCarthyite? [139 words]Craig RanapiaOct 2, 2002 18:16
Phil Donahue [46 words]John R. CohnOct 2, 2002 17:51
You are amazing. [45 words]Robert G. MogullOct 2, 2002 02:49
Donahue is awful [114 words]Phil GetzOct 2, 2002 00:26
The Phil Donahue debate [200 words]Marilyn A. FrithOct 1, 2002 19:19
Will the real "failed academic," please stand up. [145 words]EdOct 1, 2002 17:24
Thank you for exposing the pervasiveness of this problem [73 words]Juli AnnOct 1, 2002 16:42
The War with Iraq is heating up...here in Vancouver ! [318 words]Joyena AbrahamOct 1, 2002 16:24
The Universtiy Game [287 words]SheerahkahnOct 1, 2002 15:38
Typical behavior [91 words]Tim WilsonOct 1, 2002 15:19
You stood firm! [41 words]rachelOct 1, 2002 14:24
Easily exposed [69 words]Dan EisenbergOct 1, 2002 12:44
It's the Socialists! [264 words]DanielOct 1, 2002 12:39
Great work, but the wrong arena [169 words]Russ ParkerOct 1, 2002 11:16
Good job, DOCTOR Pipes! [137 words]John WilkinsonOct 1, 2002 10:46
Donahue and perpetuation of lies [119 words]R. GarfieldOct 1, 2002 10:44
Name Game [96 words]GloriaOct 1, 2002 10:31
Dabashi "standards" [61 words]AdamOct 1, 2002 08:54
What a tangled web ... [345 words]Ellen Ben-EliahuOct 1, 2002 05:54
The Don Rickles Of Mid East Debate [136 words]Ben CreechOct 1, 2002 00:03
No surprises here [159 words]ChristopherSep 30, 2002 23:33
Blacklist? [181 words]Lawrence RicciSep 30, 2002 23:18
Why Donahue? [76 words]JeanSep 30, 2002 23:04
Professor Dabashi's Logic [97 words]Lee D. CarySep 30, 2002 21:52
DonaWhoo [9 words]Harold DodsonSep 30, 2002 21:39
Donahue, Dabashi & Pipes [174 words]William PapkeSep 30, 2002 20:47
THE TRUTH IS WONDERFUL [89 words]Fred EdisonSep 30, 2002 20:47
Keep on standing up to criticism! [36 words]Rachelle Mand, PhdSep 30, 2002 20:41
#264: Pipes v. Dabashi on MBNBC's "Donahue" [103 words]Michael RifkinSep 30, 2002 20:41
You are doing the right thing! [104 words]Sara MillerSep 30, 2002 20:41
Direct Hit [81 words]Howard HymanSep 30, 2002 20:09
Mr. Cool! [12 words]Lynda KramerSep 30, 2002 19:56
Personal Attacks On You [70 words]Jason Epstein, Director of Legislative Affairs, B'nai B'rith IntlSep 30, 2002 19:26

Comment on this item

Name
Email Address (optional)
Title of Comments
Comments:

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

See the 25 most recent outstanding comments.

Back to top of page