35 readers online now

98,675 comments by 26,222 readers

Go to Mobile Site

Latest Articles

 

ADVERTISEMENTS



Premium Links
by Wikio

Computers
Electronics
Communication
Appliances

eXTReMe Tracker

What a tangled web ...
Reader comment on item: Campus Watch - A Good Idea?

Submitted by Ellen Ben-Eliahu (Denmark), Oct 1, 2002 at 05:54

This comment is by way of admiration and support for your courage in taking on the academic establishment. There is almost no feeling more horrible and embarrassing for a student than to stand up during a professor's lecture and challenge his biased statement or skewed historical view. I did it once at the Univ. of Texas as a freshman 50 years ago, and I still remember shaking with the mixture of anger and humiliation in front of 100 other students as I left the lecture hall, still playing his authoritarian put-down over and over in my mind. In those days it had only been a simple unfounded statement about who killed Jesus (an important question in Texas), but you are today dealing with a powerful hidden lobby of well-entrenched academics.

And now, you are also being attacked personally - not for your ideas - but with all the pontifical outrage of professors and department chairmen accustomed to their cloistered dignity.

It is a very tangled web you're going into - and I wish I had a way to protect you on your journey besides only good wishes. I try to think of some logical way to strengthen your hand and offer your team of colleagues practical suggestions.
Perhaps some latent resentment about overblown funding for non-objective Middle East Studies departments in major universities could be activated - i.e., soliciting public support from professors in other departments who've watched them grow and gain too much influence through donation-funding and endowment of Chairs from pro-Arab sources. I'm only guessing here, of course. The money trail is often very revealing.

From my roots as a bleeding-heart liberal do-gooder (weren't we all in the days of our youth?), I've had to accept through all these years of observation and 30 years living in Israel, that social and geo-political realities are not what we would wish them to be. My work involved me in academia most of my life, so I know exactly what sort of especially nasty web you're trying to bring out into the light.

May the Force be with you!

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

Submit a comment on this item

Search by Enter name or date
Search Forum Comments:

Reader comments (46) on this item

Title By Date
Are you all missing the point? [411 words]David WoodOct 9, 2002 05:03
KUDOS TO DANIEL PIPES [162 words]BruceOct 8, 2002 20:58
A failed academic? I don't think so. [185 words]Maryallene OtisOct 8, 2002 09:48
The pot calling the kettle black [178 words]SusanOct 7, 2002 16:05
Bravo, Dr. Daniel Pipes [193 words]Arlene SwartzmanOct 6, 2002 02:49
McCarthyism? I think not. [127 words]Maurice TawilOct 6, 2002 02:34
Donahue = Liberal Bias [89 words]M. LouchheimOct 5, 2002 23:05
Thank You, Mr. Pipes!! [92 words]Carrie OkayOct 5, 2002 04:30
Disappointed
[w/response] [74 words]
Jed GelberOct 5, 2002 01:32
Great job; Dabashi is a worrisome and dangerous 'joke' [87 words]Stanley MarguliesOct 4, 2002 00:22
Campus Watch: Bringing Balance to a Lopsided Discussion [149 words]Eva GoldmanOct 3, 2002 17:44
Keep it up, Dr. Pipes [208 words]Ted RoseOct 3, 2002 06:02
Cry 'Wolf!!!' one more time!!!! [75 words]Roger EllisOct 3, 2002 01:54
Who's the real McCarthyite? [139 words]Craig RanapiaOct 2, 2002 18:16
Phil Donahue [46 words]John R. CohnOct 2, 2002 17:51
You are amazing. [45 words]Robert G. MogullOct 2, 2002 02:49
Donahue is awful [114 words]Phil GetzOct 2, 2002 00:26
The Phil Donahue debate [200 words]Marilyn A. FrithOct 1, 2002 19:19
Will the real "failed academic," please stand up. [145 words]EdOct 1, 2002 17:24
Thank you for exposing the pervasiveness of this problem [73 words]Juli AnnOct 1, 2002 16:42
The War with Iraq is heating up...here in Vancouver ! [318 words]Joyena AbrahamOct 1, 2002 16:24
The Universtiy Game [287 words]SheerahkahnOct 1, 2002 15:38
Typical behavior [91 words]Tim WilsonOct 1, 2002 15:19
You stood firm! [41 words]rachelOct 1, 2002 14:24
Easily exposed [69 words]Dan EisenbergOct 1, 2002 12:44
It's the Socialists! [264 words]DanielOct 1, 2002 12:39
Great work, but the wrong arena [169 words]Russ ParkerOct 1, 2002 11:16
Good job, DOCTOR Pipes! [137 words]John WilkinsonOct 1, 2002 10:46
Donahue and perpetuation of lies [119 words]R. GarfieldOct 1, 2002 10:44
Name Game [96 words]GloriaOct 1, 2002 10:31
Dabashi "standards" [61 words]AdamOct 1, 2002 08:54
⇒ What a tangled web ... [345 words]Ellen Ben-EliahuOct 1, 2002 05:54
The Don Rickles Of Mid East Debate [136 words]Ben CreechOct 1, 2002 00:03
No surprises here [159 words]ChristopherSep 30, 2002 23:33
Blacklist? [181 words]Lawrence RicciSep 30, 2002 23:18
Why Donahue? [76 words]JeanSep 30, 2002 23:04
Professor Dabashi's Logic [97 words]Lee D. CarySep 30, 2002 21:52
DonaWhoo [9 words]Harold DodsonSep 30, 2002 21:39
Donahue, Dabashi & Pipes [174 words]William PapkeSep 30, 2002 20:47
THE TRUTH IS WONDERFUL [89 words]Fred EdisonSep 30, 2002 20:47
Keep on standing up to criticism! [36 words]Rachelle Mand, PhdSep 30, 2002 20:41
#264: Pipes v. Dabashi on MBNBC's "Donahue" [103 words]Michael RifkinSep 30, 2002 20:41
You are doing the right thing! [104 words]Sara MillerSep 30, 2002 20:41
Direct Hit [81 words]Howard HymanSep 30, 2002 20:09
Mr. Cool! [12 words]Lynda KramerSep 30, 2002 19:56
Personal Attacks On You [70 words]Jason Epstein, Director of Legislative Affairs, B'nai B'rith IntlSep 30, 2002 19:26

Comment on this item

Name
Email Address (optional)
Title of Comments
Comments:

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.

See the 25 most recent outstanding comments.

ADVERTISEMENTS

All materials written by Daniel Pipes on this site © Daniel Pipes. Email: MeqMef@aol.com

You can help support Daniel Pipes' important work by making a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.