Submitted by Marilyn A. Frith (United States), Oct 1, 2002 at 19:19
Dear Mr. Pipes,
I just read through the transcript of your TV discussion with the Middle Eastern
professor and attempted to be as objective as possible, given my study of
the many issues surrounding the conflict in Israel. I admit to bias, coming down
with a certain prejudice against Palestinian claims to territory and history.
The forum of the TV talk show is woefully remiss in quality of dialogue as well
as most host's pre-show preparation. The lack of sufficient time to adequately address issues of such immediate importance would be laughable, if not so serious.
I am sorry that our media cannot afford you the opportunity to set out your
case clearly without those constraints. Even given an opponent's handicap
perhaps of language and media savvy, I see no reason for hedging, retreating into
a defensive dodge on main points and finally resorting to name calling. This is a sad day for an American public in need of vital information, who must instead, settle for a truncated snippet of debate caught in the trappings of media hype.
I don't have a TV and I thank a member of my online newgroup for forwarding
this transcript. I will visit your website as soon as this e-mail is sent.
Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened for relevance, substance, and tone, and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome, but comments are rejected if scurrilous, off-topic, vulgar, ad hominem, or otherwise viewed as inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the Guidelines for Comments. For informational purposes, we identify countries from which comments are sent.
| Title |
By |
Date |
| Are you all missing the point? [411 words] | David Wood | Oct 9, 2002 05:03 |
| KUDOS TO DANIEL PIPES [162 words] | Bruce | Oct 8, 2002 20:58 |
| A failed academic? I don't think so. [185 words] | Maryallene Otis | Oct 8, 2002 09:48 |
| The pot calling the kettle black [178 words] | Susan | Oct 7, 2002 16:05 |
| Bravo, Dr. Daniel Pipes [193 words] | Arlene Swartzman | Oct 6, 2002 02:49 |
| McCarthyism? I think not. [127 words] | Maurice Tawil | Oct 6, 2002 02:34 |
| Donahue = Liberal Bias [89 words] | M. Louchheim | Oct 5, 2002 23:05 |
| Thank You, Mr. Pipes!! [92 words] | Carrie Okay | Oct 5, 2002 04:30 |
Disappointed [w/response] [74 words] | Jed Gelber | Oct 5, 2002 01:32 |
| Great job; Dabashi is a worrisome and dangerous 'joke' [87 words] | Stanley Margulies | Oct 4, 2002 00:22 |
| Campus Watch: Bringing Balance to a Lopsided Discussion [149 words] | Eva Goldman | Oct 3, 2002 17:44 |
| Keep it up, Dr. Pipes [208 words] | Ted Rose | Oct 3, 2002 06:02 |
| Cry 'Wolf!!!' one more time!!!! [75 words] | Roger Ellis | Oct 3, 2002 01:54 |
| Who's the real McCarthyite? [139 words] | Craig Ranapia | Oct 2, 2002 18:16 |
| Phil Donahue [46 words] | John R. Cohn | Oct 2, 2002 17:51 |
| You are amazing. [45 words] | Robert G. Mogull | Oct 2, 2002 02:49 |
| Donahue is awful [114 words] | Phil Getz | Oct 2, 2002 00:26 |
| ⇒ The Phil Donahue debate [200 words] | Marilyn A. Frith | Oct 1, 2002 19:19 |
| Will the real "failed academic," please stand up. [145 words] | Ed | Oct 1, 2002 17:24 |
| Thank you for exposing the pervasiveness of this problem [73 words] | Juli Ann | Oct 1, 2002 16:42 |
| The War with Iraq is heating up...here in Vancouver ! [318 words] | Joyena Abraham | Oct 1, 2002 16:24 |
| The Universtiy Game [287 words] | Sheerahkahn | Oct 1, 2002 15:38 |
| Typical behavior [91 words] | Tim Wilson | Oct 1, 2002 15:19 |
| You stood firm! [41 words] | rachel | Oct 1, 2002 14:24 |
| Easily exposed [69 words] | Dan Eisenberg | Oct 1, 2002 12:44 |
| It's the Socialists! [264 words] | Daniel | Oct 1, 2002 12:39 |
| Great work, but the wrong arena [169 words] | Russ Parker | Oct 1, 2002 11:16 |
| Good job, DOCTOR Pipes! [137 words] | John Wilkinson | Oct 1, 2002 10:46 |
| Donahue and perpetuation of lies [119 words] | R. Garfield | Oct 1, 2002 10:44 |
| Name Game [96 words] | Gloria | Oct 1, 2002 10:31 |
| Dabashi "standards" [61 words] | Adam | Oct 1, 2002 08:54 |
| What a tangled web ... [345 words] | Ellen Ben-Eliahu | Oct 1, 2002 05:54 |
| The Don Rickles Of Mid East Debate [136 words] | Ben Creech | Oct 1, 2002 00:03 |
| No surprises here [159 words] | Christopher | Sep 30, 2002 23:33 |
| Blacklist? [181 words] | Lawrence Ricci | Sep 30, 2002 23:18 |
| Why Donahue? [76 words] | Jean | Sep 30, 2002 23:04 |
| Professor Dabashi's Logic [97 words] | Lee D. Cary | Sep 30, 2002 21:52 |
| DonaWhoo [9 words] | Harold Dodson | Sep 30, 2002 21:39 |
| Donahue, Dabashi & Pipes [174 words] | William Papke | Sep 30, 2002 20:47 |
| THE TRUTH IS WONDERFUL [89 words] | Fred Edison | Sep 30, 2002 20:47 |
| Keep on standing up to criticism! [36 words] | Rachelle Mand, Phd | Sep 30, 2002 20:41 |
| #264: Pipes v. Dabashi on MBNBC's "Donahue" [103 words] | Michael Rifkin | Sep 30, 2002 20:41 |
| You are doing the right thing! [104 words] | Sara Miller | Sep 30, 2002 20:41 |
| Direct Hit [81 words] | Howard Hyman | Sep 30, 2002 20:09 |
| Mr. Cool! [12 words] | Lynda Kramer | Sep 30, 2002 19:56 |
| Personal Attacks On You [70 words] | Jason Epstein, Director of Legislative Affairs, B'nai B'rith Intl | Sep 30, 2002 19:26 |