2 readers online now  |  69 million page views

A list of Lies

Reader comment on item: Arabist Snobs
in response to reader comment: The master of Taqiyya strikes again

Submitted by Amin Riaz (United Kingdom), Dec 20, 2011 at 18:30

YOU TRIED TO PIN A LIE ON ME - BUT EVEN THAT WAS A LIE - EASY TO PROVE - ONE JUST HAS TO READ PREVIOUS COMMENTS

YOUR INABILITY TO FIND SUPPORT FOR YOUR ARGUMENT BORNE OUT OF HATE AND PREJUDICE SAYS IT ALL. IT IS NO ARGUMENT. THEN YOUR STRANGE LIES ALONG THE WAY.... THEY MAKE YOU LOOK LIKE A FOOL.

This master of taqiyah business itself is a lie and you have lied constantly let me list a few:

You lied about the word LAZER. You got the spelling wrong and tried to pretend that is the word you intended. Whereas Lazer is not a word. And you meant to ask for words of Arabic . How stupid is that?

Then you made a strange claim that Laser is an adjective when it clearly is not. Yet when I asked you to prove it OBVIOUSLY you went silent. Another set of strange lies.

Another lie - I had asked you quite early on and asked repeatedly to find a Western Scholar - yet now you lie - this is again easy to prove - just scroll to the previous comments.

The reason - if presented with a Muslim scholar you would only claim oh a Muslim scholar is bound to agree with me. That is why I asked you for views of Western Scholars - EVEN if they were not credible ... yet you failed and you know perfectly well your views are NOT shared by any credible scholar at all. If not then you would have presented the evidence.

Yet I gave you a chosen list of Western Scholars that do not for example hold Arabic as weak language - rather the opposite as a sophisticated language.

The scholar you quoted - I posted his complete quote. His assertion was same as your point that Arabic does not translate many science work or produces them. Yet this is NOT the argument at all - and never has been. I repeatedly told you that. Yet you clean ignore it out of pure hate for Muslims. I have already dealt with that - yet you did not bother to comment on that - yet proceeded in another lie.

Here again you chose to deceitful - as you did not bother to mention my last reply. This DID NOT mount to the professor equating Arabic as weak language. Neither does he similar views as you. And the point stands ..... you have not found a single Western Scholar to support your view. The one you found DOES not support your view either.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

You asked for just one, I provided one, now you change the rules?

Previous comment indicate other wise - And I pointed out in my last post - this scholar does not agree with you at all in that Arabic is a weak language. He made the same point that Arabic inadequately deals with huge amount of science writings. And this not the same argument as Arabic being a weak language I have told you that repeatedly as well.

In fact it is ENGLISH that is weak that relies on Latin and Greek for virtually all scientific words. And as an ancient language Arabic has given EVEN to English many loan words. That is beside giving words to other languages.

And you claim to be an expert in languages? As to your claims in relation to online translators, the words you give to not translate both ways, as I said before, translating from English microchip to Arabic then translating the same word back gives the English chip, NOT MICROCHIP.

... - I have to ask you this.... does everything just go over your head and you come out with ignorance and prejudice and hate

Those online translators translate EVERY LANGUAGE incorrectly - why do you thing people still learn languages and there is still an occupational field for translations. Else machine would do it all.

How is it either my or Arabic's fault for quality of Online Translators? Those are not serious lexicon and are not

I have told you all this. Rather that having an adequate response - you just repeat the BILE , THE IGNORANCE. What is the point of that?

Also - you only SPEAK one of the languages - so you cannot verify what the translation is both ways.

THis is another of your lies. You had claimed

Then you edited the word ازر and claimed it meant rice - whereas it is impossible for a translator to do that. That proved your stupid idiotic lie.

Denial and lie as much as you like, what I say is demonstrate-able and repeatable to every reader here. You say I have given no proof? That demonstrates that you are no expert except in Taqiyya, in that what I propose has not absolute truths, but there are indicative evidence to support what I claim.

Yet no other scholar has manage to pick it up - really? And now you say these are just indications.

Yet it is ME who is denying something? Whereas expert view of Arabic is it is a sophisticated language.

Arabic is a linguistics dream language given its logical as opposed to English that lost many of its grammatical aspect. Linguistics - in Arabic - is a very advanced science - even if it did stagnate.

The view that Arabic somehow is a weak language is RIDICULOUS.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

I cite the low levels of translations of other languages into Arabic compared to most other languages. I gave the example that there are more books translated into Spanish than have been translated into Arabic over the last 1000 years. I also cite the very small number of Arabic books translated in other languages each year. I also cite the extremely low academic achievements of Arabic speakers and the extremely poor standards of Universities that are in Arabic speaking countries. I also cited to low numbers of Arabic speakers who have won Nobel awards in the sciences and arts. I also showed the very low levels of scientific papers and journals coming out of Arabic speaking countries.All these things show that Arabic is not used by people who read books, write books or who are involved in the sciences.

This has go nothing to do with whether Arabic is a weak language or not. That is not the same argument. This shows stagnation of Arabic culture. And that is not under argument. Linguistically Arabic is highly sophisticated language.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Considering the large number of people who speak Arabic, they are under represented in these basic measures. All you have responded with are denial, and lies. I have shown my sources and can provide many others to support my position, you have provided no such evidence to support your position. I guess your "victories" you keep claiming and your intellectual dominance you claim, are as hollow as your arguments. The responses your comments get are indicative of your victory or defeat.

Oh have you forgotten so easily - what a mess you made of spelling the word LASER. And what a mess you made claiming it was an adjective.

If that was not a VICTORY ... what was it?

Submitting....

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

Comment on this item

Mark my comment as a response to A list of Lies by Amin Riaz

Email me if someone replies to my comment

Note: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the authors alone and not necessarily those of Daniel Pipes. Original writing only, please. Comments are screened and in some cases edited before posting. Reasoned disagreement is welcome but not comments that are scurrilous, off-topic, commercial, disparaging religions, or otherwise inappropriate. For complete regulations, see the "Guidelines for Reader Comments".

See recent outstanding comments.

Follow Daniel Pipes

Facebook   Twitter   RSS   Join Mailing List
eXTReMe Tracker

All materials by Daniel Pipes on this site: © 1968-2020 Daniel Pipes. daniel.pipes@gmail.com and @DanielPipes

Support Daniel Pipes' work with a tax-deductible donation to the Middle East Forum.Daniel J. Pipes

(The MEF is a publicly supported, nonprofit organization under section 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Contributions are tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. Tax-ID 23-774-9796, approved Apr. 27, 1998.

For more information, view our IRS letter of determination.)